Right. If he resigns whilst under investigation for a disciplinary matter, his employer can refer to that fact. The TU Rep is wrong. And, if his employer refers to him having resigned whilst under investigation, many potential employers will see that as a strong indication that he was guilty. He needs to face the accusation, if he's being wrongly accused. He needs to get onto his union and tell them to buck their ideas up too. Most of them are bed-wetting gimps who live with their mothers. Set out the full situation, and we'll have a look. Use Paragraphs. That way we can read what you have to say Easil

you can hate them all you want (as so do most of us do) BUT ignoring them isnt the way forward, in my opinion it will come back to haunt you and ignoring them fuels the fire for them. Try answering the calls and telling them your situation, this is what i can afford to pay, i'm not giving you my details and if you give me your details i will pay you direct. If you answer the phone they wont need to continue calling, thats what i've found to be most useful.

The TU Rep certainly wants reporting and almost certainly needs shooting before he does any more damage. Resigning before a disciplinary hearing without a compromise agreement firstly being agreed (even if one is on offer) is every bit as bad, and in many cases worse, than going through the disciplinary and being dismissed. A reference of any sort - and particularly in the care sector where particular care needs to be taken over reporting EVERYTHING accurately and honestly - will almost always ask the previous employer to confirm the reason for leaving, and 'Resigned whilst the subject of a disciplinary investigation for Gross Misco

There is no legal requirement for a contract to be in writing. A verbal tenancy agreement is perfectly legal, if a tenancy is intended, where the letting is a weekly or monthly let (in fact, for any period not exceeding 3 years). Under the 1988 Housing Act, unless a different type of tenancy is specifically agreed on, an agreement to create a tenancy creates a shorthold tenancy. Under such a tenancy the landlord cannot give less than 2 months notice of eviction, and such a notice can't take effect until the end of the 6th month of the tenancy, if the tenant keeps to the terms of the letting; but eviction can be applied for under sec

Well first off, if you are denied a mortgage due to incorrect data on your credit file, then you will have a substantial claim for damages against them and the CRA who allowed this data to be put on your file. Stay OFF the phone, unless you can record the conversation then you have no evidence of them ever taking place, keep everything in WRITING only. Open a formal complaint with Pipex, exhaust it until you either get the result you need or you can escalate it to OfCom. Who's the DCA? You can send them one letter, and one letter only, telling them it is disputed with the OC, they are wasting their time writing to you, as no co

I think AST or Assoured Tennancy is the default position in absence of anything else. Check with shelter or on Direct.gov. site. Also Landlordzone is useful

I don't know, but I was looking at A G Securities -v- Vaughan; Antoniades -v- Villiers and Bridger, and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Street_v_Mountford to get an idea of how it works. I can imagine this one may be a grey area that would depend on the judge's inclination! I assume there is no contract?