Hearing to remove stay

[Audreygreeneyes]

WEll done Penfoldthat I think is a good thing.... he wants you to have your day in court that HSBC thought they woud deny you....... we have plenty time to prepare your arguements....:) well done........... i have some case numbers for you and there are other bank numbers as well.............

[Audreygreeneyes]

Penfold might be worth changing it to your worship. as that si what county court judges are called you honor in the high court.......... the part about the luton thing. here is part of the clip

 

Judge Abrahams, at Luton County Court, has ordered Barclays to stop applying the charges until a High Court test case settles the legal issues involved.

 

also if you can find some where to fit in that the bank's collectively have settled 94 cases since the oft announcemnt on the 27th July when they went to the high court.......this is the ones we know about........ there coudl be more that we dont.....

but again all this info just adds more weight and also shows just the extent to which they will go to manipulate the system...........:)

 

good letter.........

[Audreygreeneyes]

oh jsut one other thought Penfold.. did they by any chance fail to submit anything to the court by its due date?

[Audreygreeneyes]

you also might want to put in that they be ordered to stop applying charges to your account until this case has been settled in the high court.........

[Audreygreeneyes]

ignore that i have just seen that you have got the 94 in................ am not having a good day.........lol

[Audreygreeneyes]

Nope a they only needed to submit defence then went straight to stay by the judge.............. ok

 

Point taken about worship and will alter on real thing........... just thought as you had made sucha good job of it.......

 

Glad you spoted the 94 thingie, so they are settled cases, but we just do not have the case numbers right?. no we do not............ it was on someone elses post i saw it........... but the numbers you have are from the hsbc on and I have collected them form those concerned. when I have seen a judgement awarded. I have aske dfor the number and kept a list......

 

Can't put the charges bit in as no account with them, but did sort of include it...ah right ok...........

 

Thanks,

 

Penfold

[Audreygreeneyes]

looks great Penfold, just a passing thought it might just be worth putting in there the claim numbers for some of the ones we know they have settled.......:)

[Audreygreeneyes]

that way DG will be able to actually check how accurate your info is:):)

[Audreygreeneyes]

penfold i have the full "waiver" file if oyu want that as well:):)

 

penfold dont forget the 94 cases settled since the oft announcement.......

[Audreygreeneyes]

my view is it is VITAL the JUDGE gets to see it first, DG well, last minute fax to them woudl be appropriate...... again only my view but thisis a costly excersise for them, it also takes outthe intimidations factor.....of having a Barrister come up and introduce themselves adn puff out thier chest with you are going to lose......

 

agian only my view but this judge has doen oyu a favour (i think) my gut feeling is they will nto set it up, make you an offer before it and ask you to cancel the hearing, like they are doing with others.......

but I could be wrong.........

[Audreygreeneyes]

love it freaky..........lol. liek the new avatar.............

 

Cheap Teleconferencing, Cheap Conference Call, UK conference calls UK Virtual numbers, UK Numbers 0800 numbers, 0845, 020, virtual office

 

Conference Calls, Conference Calling - Conference Genie

 

Audio Conference Call Information

 

theres a couple oif links... with some info on them.... not sure if DG will use BT

[Audreygreeneyes]

oh

[Audreygreeneyes]

oh yeah before i forget no reply to me fax so far........ but then I suppose they have still a few weeks..........lol

[Audreygreeneyes]

keep up the good work penfold:)

[Audreygreeneyes]

IMHO the judge is just stalling, he is making it look like he is allowing your case to move forward!!!! he knows you will nto be alloted a slot before the test case starts........... and that very possibly by the time your hearing/telephone conference is reallocated this whole sorry business wil have gone away and he will have his court back:)

 

as I have said several times in the past few months I really dont see it gettting into court.........an 11th hour deal will be struck...... but then again I could be wrong.....

 

any prabs, I know how frustrating and extremly unfair it is, as far as this topic goes, there is only one winner the banks, the courts own cpr do not apply in these cases but big business does............:)

[Audreygreeneyes]

IMHO firstly you are not 100% clear in your wording, have the put clearly in writing they hold statements going back till the account was opened?

 

If they have then I coudl be asking for copies of them now , as they shoudl be covered under the S.A.R....... but some of the others will correctme if I am wrong.........

 

if they are and they have not supplied them, then you have them for failure to comply !!

 

my next move before I did anything was get the copies, there is a very real chance that the bank could and would claim they had made an error and did not in actual fact have them!!! and then you are snookered......

 

the only other thing I can see is that the other banks may very well claim, that is not our procedure, proving they all operate the same might be very difficult.....

 

if it was me I would be pushing for copies of the statements refered to and going after them under the SAR rules if they have not fully complied.........

 

Auds:)

[Audreygreeneyes]

I am slightly confused............lol. no surprise there then........ if you are not after the charges, erm why the interest in the statements?

 

Yes this maybe of interest but again the banks could claim that each individual bank operates a different policy.........