Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good evening, so not a good weekend reviewing paperwork -- I have lost some proofs of postage.. also, although not provided at CCA, they have now supplied a DN in their WS, please see scan of claimants WS (without statements) Document with tick boxes as signatures doesn't look like an agreement and is split across pages. Documents have been stapled and copied multiple times looking at the top left of them. Aside from that, having read other threads, I suspect they have everything? appreciate your input please Sorry for heavy redactions, I noticed the paperwork was see-through LinkHalifaxCC1.compressed.pdf
    • Received a final demand today Final demand.pdf
    • Here is my final draft: I, XXXXXX, being the Defendant in this case will state as follows; I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in the claim and further to my set aside application dated 1 November 2022. The claimants witness statement confirms that it mostly relies on hearsay evidence as confirmed by the drafts in person in the opening paragraph. It is my understanding they must serve notice to any hearsay evidence pursuant to CPR 33.2(1)(B) (notice of intention to rely on hearsay evidence) and Section 2 (1) (A) of the Civil Evidence Act.   1.        The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2 February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None of these documents were received by the court nor the defendant by that date.   2.        I understand that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed and which the original creditors have already wrote off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income as confirmed in the claimants witness statement exhibit by way of the Deed of Assignment.   As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights.  This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information).  The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.   3.        The alleged letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address.  I have attached a copy of my tenancy agreement which is marked ‘Appendix 1’ and shows I was residing at a difference address as of 11 December 2018 and was therefore not at the service address at the time the proceedings were served.  I have also attached an email from my solicitors to the Claimants solicitors dated 14 July 2022 which was sent to them requesting that they disclose the trace of evidence they utilised prior to issuing the proceedings against me.  This is marked ‘Appendix 2’.  The claimants solicitors did not provide me with these documents.   4.        Under The Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims 2017 a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior to and including ,The Pre action Protocol letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claim form dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018.   5.        I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020.   6.        Upon the discovery of the Judgement debt, I made immediate contact with the Court and the Claimant Solicitors, putting them on notice that I was making investigations in relation to the Judgement debt as it was not familiar to me.  I asked them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.   The correspondence to the Claimant Solicotors is attached and marked ‘Appendix 3’   7.        I then sent a Data Subject Access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided. Details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 4’and the copies of correspondence between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 5’.   8.        The claimant relies upon and exhibits a reconstituted version of the alleged agreement.   It is again denied that I have ever entered into an agreement with Barclaycard on or around 2000.  It is admitted that I did hold other credit agreements with other creditors and as such should this be a debt that was assigned to Barclaycard from another brand therefore the reconstituted agreement disclosed is invalid being pre April 2007 and not legally enforceable pursuant to HH Judge Waksman in Carey v HSBC 2009 EWHC3417.  Details of this are attached and marked ‘Appendix 6’.   The original credit agreement must be provided along with any reconstituted version on a modified credit agreement and must contain the names and address of debtor and creditor, agreement number and cancelation clause.   9.        Therefore the claimant is put to strict proof to disclose a true executed legible agreement on which its claim relies upon and not try to mislead the court.   10.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. Until such time the claimant can comply and disclose a true executed copy of the original assigned agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim they are not entitled while the default continues, to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. Signed                 ………………………………………………….. Name                  XXXX Date                     30 April 2024
    • Only trying to help.  Ain't being nasty.  Some
    • Hi folks, I've just found previous documentation. I thought it had gone missing. I'd forgotten that I did appeal it through POPLA but I can't find the thread on here that, I assume, I posted for help. Appeal letter is dated 27/10/2020 with a rejection. I genuinely had forgotten about this so apologies for misleading you. A lot has happened in the years since the ticket was issued. We closed down a couple of businesses and moved to the opposite end of the country to retire. The documents I have are scanned copies. I no longer have the originals. The NTK is also in there. If there's anything you'd like to see, please let me know and I'll post them, although it probably won't be until tomorrow now, but I'll be looking in on this page tonight. Thank you for the responses so far
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Disability Employment Advisor


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6074 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Firt of all, you really don't need to worry about this, it is nothing sinister at all! DEAs (or, as they are also know, Incapacity Benefit Personal Advisers) are there to offer you the support you want, in the way you want it, to help you look at returning to work.

 

The law requires you to attend an interview with them if JCP so requires you, but they don't have the power to force you to take a job or anything like that. If you dont wish or feel able to seek employment, go and tell them this. You will then have participated in the interview and wont face a benefit reduction penalty.

 

From the sounds of it though, it seems you're looking at gradually taking on your own business - the DEAs can help with this. Are you aware you can claim certian benefits in addition to your DLA if your working (either employed or self-employed):-

 

1. Working Tax Credit (upto about £90 per week on top of wages for a single person with HRCC of DLA)

 

2. Return to Work Credit (£40 per week for 52 weeks as a golden hello; disregarded in the calculation of all other benefits)

 

3. Housing Benefit/Council Tax Benefit may still be payable (HRCC of DLA entitles you to the Severe Disability Premium)

 

4. Access to Work (costs to help you with your employment, such as special equipment, a personal assistant, costs of taxis if you cant use public transport etc.)

 

5. Job Grants - up to £450 as a one-off payment for getting back to work

 

6. Advisors Fund - extra money awarded by the DEA or IBPA at their discretion to help with extra costs - say if you needed an outfit for an interview

 

7. Travel to Interview - your costs for going to an interview paid in full

 

Is there anything in particular you want to know about regarding DEAs and the above? If so, get in touch with me, I've had the misforune of seeing them several times because of my disabilities, and every time they've helped me get back to work. :-)

 

Dave

Here to help!

 

Good with employment, disability and welfare/benefit questions :rolleyes:

Just ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dave

Many thanks for your very helpful response, but I have a couple more questions if you can help.

 

Not a problem, I always try to do my best :-)

 

I've had my 'work focussed' interview, over the phone about two weeks ago. I do understand that they are compulsory, and once they stopped insisting that I go to the jobcentre, I didn't mind doing it. I did tell them I cannot and will not ever be able to work full time, and any conventional job is unlikely to provide the sort of flexibility I need - I don't know how I'm going to feel each day until I get up, so I don't know in advance if I will be able to do anything other than sit on the sofa - but they still insisted that I see a DEA although they did agree to come to me. Are they able to insist even though I've done the interview?

 

As I've already said, if you don't attend and participate you can face a sanction of your benefits. Them visiting you and you telling them you don't want or intend to look for a job is participating. You telling them to go away because you don't want a job so wont have an interview is not.

 

What is really worrying me is that I have heard (from a usually reliable source) that the very suggestion that you might be able to work is often enough to get your DLA reviewed and reduced, and I had such a battle to get it in the first place! Is this something you've heard of?[/Quote]

 

You are obliged to inform the Disability and Carers Service of any material change in your circumstances. So, you would for example tell them if you started a job doing door to door canvassing if you receive highest rate mobility because you have active and progressive poly-arthritis which makes you virtually unable to walk.

 

The fact that you are returning to work could equally provide further evidence of your mobility and care needs: if, for example, you get to work using a taxi paid for by access to work because you suffer with anxiety in crowded places, and you have a support worker to help you getting to and from work, this demonstrates that you need guidance or supervision outdoors, and that you need help with your bodily functions or to keep you safe during the day.

 

There genuinely is absolutely no chance of me getting a job outside the home unless my employer is prepared for me to not turn up with no notice on a regular basis, [/Quote]

 

There are lots of jobs (either employed or self-employed) you can do from home: proofreading, researching (perhaps for an MP), piano lessons etc.

Not being able to get out of the house isn't the barrier it used to be. :-)

 

nor is there much chance of me being able to earn enough to replace benefits, much as I would love to stop getting what I still feel is 'charity', even though I know I've paid my NI so am entitled. [/Quote]

 

I've been in receipt of DLA since before I left high school, coming up to seven years now. On and off I've also claimed IS and IB when I haven't been able to work. So I haven't paid much NI at all. Don't let it bother you, and don't feel like your taking charity - it certainly doesn't bother me. It is the responsibility of the state and its citizens in a free and compassionate society to support the needy.

 

As for earnings, look at the following two scenarios:

 

Scenario 1 - Don't work

1. You claim DLA HRCC and LRMC, income of approx £92 per week

2. You claim Income Support and IB (and live alone): around £135 per week

3. 100% of rent and council tax paid for (HB & CTB)

 

Income of around £300 per week*

 

Scenario 2 - Do work (16 hours per week or so)

1. DLA as above - approx £92 per week

2. Wages (assuming £6 per hour): £96 per week

3. Tax Credits of around £90 per week

4. around 75-80% of rent and council tax paid for*

 

Income of around £340 per week

 

*assuming rent of £50pw and council tax of £1000pa

 

PLUS, on returning to work you'd also get:

£40 per week for one year (return to work credit)

£250 one-off payment from the Jobcentre

£200 one-off payment from a Job Broker

 

 

Apart from my fluctuating health, I really shouldn't be out of the house on my own, so who would take me to work? Even getting me to my hospital appointments is a major undertaking meaning that my son has to book a day off work or one of my parents has to come over and take me, and they live 50 miles away.[/Quote]

 

The Access to work scheme funds anything end everything you need to work. If you need taxis, they will pay for taxis. If you need an escort in the taxi, they will pay for an escort. If you need a reader because you're visually impaired, they will pay for one. If you need a special chair, or desk, or computer, or computer software, they will pay for it. Absolutely anything you need to get you back at work.

 

Getting more positive, if I did try to start a business, would they be able to help with e.g. start up costs? [/Quote]

 

You can access help through the New Deal Schemes, or you could contact your local Business Link who are very knowledgeable on this type of funding. Bear in mind you can claim Access to Work for the kinds of things talked about above if you are self employed, too. So if you needed special computer equipment to do your self-employed work, you will still get it provided.

 

And how would income support cope with an unpredictable income? Would I have to reclaim every week based on how much I'd earned?

 

Put simply, it wouldn't. Income Support is generally an 'out of work benefit'. You would claim Tax Credits instead (see above). Tax credit awards are paid on the past years earnings, unless there is a specific reason not to. On that basis, for the first year you'd get the full entitlement based on the above figures and working 16 hours per week. If, come next April, you're earning more than expected, your tax credits will drop to accommodate.

 

I hope this helps.

 

David

  • Haha 2

Here to help!

 

Good with employment, disability and welfare/benefit questions :rolleyes:

Just ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update in case anyone else is reading this because they are in the same situation.

Thanks to David's excellent advice I wasn't nearly as worried by this interview as I could have been, and it all went really well. If anything the DEA has made things even easier as my GP was getting 'twitchy' about giving more sick notes, but she believes that as I have been on the full rate of Incapacity benefit for over a year, I don't actually need to send in any more sick notes.

 

This is exactly right. For the first six months on IB you submit sick notes, because you are subject to the 'own occupation' test. This is your doctor saying you can't do your normal job. After six months you do the 'personal capability assessment', which looks at your ability to do any job. Because you receive DLA HRCC, you are EXEMPT from the personal capability assessment - so you do not need to submit any evidence of your incapacity whatsoever. In fact, JCP should have written to your doctor some time ago and told him this.

 

She also made it clear that I should stay on IB whatever the GP thinks about me going back to work as there is far more help available then. She's getting some more specific information for me and is going to contact me again next week. In particular she is going to look at what might be a reasonable number of hours for me to work - probably a maximum of 10 - and how that will affect my benefits. I am unlikely to be better off financially, but I know I will feel better if I am doing some work.

Thanks again David.

 

If you are going to be working less than 16 hours per week, this is more than likely going to be what is called Permitted Work. This would mean that you can work up to 16 hours, and earn up to £86.00 per week. Because you are exempt from the PCA, you can do this work for as long as you want. You will continue to receive your Incapacity Benefit at the current rate, but you may have reduced (or even stopped) Income Support.

 

If you are going to do permitted work, I would strongly suggest however that you do work that will not pay you any more than around £20 per week, because the first £20 of earnings are disregarded for Income Support purposes, because you receive a disability premium. Therefore you would receive your current entitlements plus the little extra from work.

 

I'm glad the session went well and I wish you the best of luck.

 

David

Here to help!

 

Good with employment, disability and welfare/benefit questions :rolleyes:

Just ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is good to hear. Myself and my hubby have both always worked except for when I have been on maternity leave. Last year however, my husband suffered a serious unexpected illness. Basically his work kep him on sick pay for as long as they possibly could, but since May he has been on IB.

we had bought our house only the month before, and due to me being off work on extended maternity leave we were worried sick.

He has been signed off work until at least next June, and although he has forwarded notes etc, he too thinks he will get one of these work related interviews fairly shortly.

Our mortgage protection now runs out on Oct 1st, and we are worried sick that our home will be taken away.

We are currently receiving IB with a carers rate for me looking after him. CT benefit, and CTC for our 3 kids.

As of next month, we will have to try and pay our mortgage out of this money but it will be hard.

 

Of course, I don't think it's nice to find others in the same situation, but at least it makes me think that we're not alone.

 

If you'd like some advice on your benefits situation (I suspect you may have some unclaimed entitlements from the sound of it), can you start a new thread so we don't hijack this one and PM me?

 

Dave

Here to help!

 

Good with employment, disability and welfare/benefit questions :rolleyes:

Just ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...