Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

charges -£5650+ £900 stat interest.anyone won this amount without going to court?


jubaxt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6180 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi-my charges from june 2001 to now are as above.which puts me at risk of going fast track.

 

am i better going for £5000 now then pursuing 2nd claim later?

 

any new developments re fast track??

 

 

have just won my co-op claim but this one makes me nervous

 

really need to submit ni but in a rut

lloyds S.A.R -sent 04/04/200

statements received 11/05/2007

prelim-14/05/2007 -£4987

lba-30/05/2007

n1-20/07/2007

 

Co-Op prelim sent-20/04/2007-£136.50

settled in full

goldfish prelim-27/06/2007

 

capital one -deemed served -01/07/2007

settlement without cci offered 17/07/2007

halifax prelim-17/07/2007

 

aqua--prelim-13/07/2007

 

welcome-prelim-30/06/2007

lba-14/07/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should not split claims to place you on a lower track, I have seem judges strike out claims for this reason.

 

I would submit a claim for the entire sum. Whilst the fast track has risks which you seem to be aware of, it is nothing to fear.

 

You can still request, around AQ time to be allocated to small claims track.

 

On yes and to answer your thread title, I have seen many successful claims >£5K.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can still request, around AQ time to be allocated to small claims track.

 

Certainly the judge in my case has told all of the many cases he's hearing for directions this and next week that he intends to allocate all claims, regardless of size, to the small claims track.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

My claim is for a bit more than the small claims track limit and has still been allocated to the SCT - at the request of both myself and LTSB.

 

As to the second question in your header; I have not seen any indication on this site where a sum of that size has been offered without the matter being in Court. The amount that is paid out prior to court proceedings seems to be limited to the "godwill gesture" payment of £750 - an amount which apparently (according to LTSB) has absolutely nothing to do with a refund of their charges, it is simply a gesture of their goodwill. When settlement time comes I wonder if their goodwill extends to that amount being kept out of the settlement calculations?

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

As to the second question in your header; I have not seen any indication on this site where a sum of that size has been offered without the matter being in Court.

 

There are many examples on this site of claims for considerably more than this sum that have been settled before coming to court. The important thing is to construct your claim correctly and be prepared for it to go to court even though the chances are it will not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nic

 

Sorry I misunderstood the point of the question. The minute a claim is issued you are strictly "going to court", even though the matter may not proceed to a full trial.

 

I have to say that I have not seen any evidence of a payment of more than £750 being made without a claim having been issued in court. Admittedly many have been settled prior to a hearing but still whilst technically in the court's process.

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks folks-reckon i'm going to take the bull by the horns and just go for it

 

i know there are plenty of 'mates 'on here who will guide me

 

will draft my poc later.

 

anything i should perhaps add to template????????

lloyds S.A.R -sent 04/04/200

statements received 11/05/2007

prelim-14/05/2007 -£4987

lba-30/05/2007

n1-20/07/2007

 

Co-Op prelim sent-20/04/2007-£136.50

settled in full

goldfish prelim-27/06/2007

 

capital one -deemed served -01/07/2007

settlement without cci offered 17/07/2007

halifax prelim-17/07/2007

 

aqua--prelim-13/07/2007

 

welcome-prelim-30/06/2007

lba-14/07/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...