Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Charges!! Can anyone help


kpow

Recommended Posts

Hello all. I found this website last night and had decided to put together my documentation to claim back bank charges, cause I am so angry with Natwest at how they do it.

 

I have an advantage gold current account, with a £2500k overdraft, I have not been working since Feb due to illness so my income has dipped considerably to approx £1150 per month so needless to say I am on a tight budget with 6yr old son. In the last 8 days natwest have applied £181 of charges to my account. one amount of £38 was because of insufficient funds for a £20s/o to my sons Young saver Account. I had cancelled this on 9th June but it went out on 12th as I had not given two working days notice, but it didnt go anywhere!! I put £5 on my mobile phone by solo card autopayment and was charged £35 due to insufficient funds. I paid sky £41.66 over phone the funds were there, but by the time they applied all of the charges and I had taken some cash they werent so sky isnt paid and I was charged £38.00!!! I have phoned and said that they are fully aware that these charges are not viable that I have not even received a single letter regarding the charges so how they are for admin costs is beyond me!! NOW Here is my immediate problem, I am budgeting on £250 a week to pay all of my bills and grocery etc I do not claim benefits. By taking £181 in charges I have been left with £70 to live on this week. I am so angry and this seems so unfair, the woman I just spoke to said that the bank have done absolutely nothing illegal and there was nothing she was prepared to do regarding these immediate charges.

 

Please does anyone have any quick advice so that I can get these charges reapplied it seems criminal that I know damn well I have the 5k amount to reclaim over the last 6 years which I shall, but they are actually because of said charges making my life a nightmare so that my standard of living at mo is Zero. Its been a bad week anyway, but this is tin lid :( In hope???? TY

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read and re-read the FAQs and the forums. That will give you the answers you need.

Start your own thread in the appropriate forum and if you have any questions un-answered, then post them in your own thread and soneone will be able to help you.

 

Don't expect your charges back by tomorrow, but if you follow the guidance from this site, you will get them.

 

Good luck with your claim and welcome to the forums.

:)

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

the woman I just spoke to said that the bank have done absolutely nothing illegal

 

it may not be illegal, but it's certainly unlawful

... a little

Mahala is a powerful thing ...

 

If you like my advice, please click the scales.

All advice is offered informally. If in any doubt, seek professional advice.

Barclays:claiming £908. Defence filed

Simply Be: settled in full

Abbey: Claim issued for DPA compliance order

GE Capital: Claim issued for DPA compliance order

Aktiv Kapital: Failed to comply with CCA disclosure. Debt unenforceable.

If this site has helped you, please make a donation to help keep it going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I put £5 on my mobile phone by solo card autopayment and was charged £35 due to insufficient funds.

 

I find this quite disturbing. Solo cards are supposed to be electronically authorised at point of sale (hence the reason some places can't take them). You should not be charged over Solo card payments as the transaction should have been declined. They would get into hot water if they let a 16 year old do this.

BEFORE starting your claim read through the FAQ's and if there's something you aren't sure of then ask.

If you win, donate to this site

Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions, some formed by personal experience and some from research. If in doubt seek qualified legal advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not every SOLO transaction is authorised in the way that you think.

 

Some retailers - particularly mobile phone companies and "Pay at Pump" petrol stations - pre-authorise to a set amount i.e. £60 at the pumps. The retailer takes the risk on the transaction and you can still become overdrawn.

 

As long as the card is not flagged as "blocked" and has £1 on - then it will authorise up to the retailers limit.

 

Try paying for petrol at the pump with only £1 in your Electron or Solo at TESCO - you will be able to draw £60 of fuel, your card will debit 2 days later and you will be O/D unless you replaced the funds.

 

I'ts a very dubious situation regarding the charges and proves that even SOLO and ELECTRON are not infallible.

HALIFAX - Settled in FULL - £1654 13/6/2006

NatWest - Prelim sent - £985 16/6/2006: LBA sent 30/6/2006 : Summary Cause issued (Sheriff Court) on 14th July : Waiting for Cobbets!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...