Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
    • urm.. i seem to recall another assault case whereby the approved bailiff company claimed the body camera was nor theirs but a pers one of the bailiff, i think they got in serious trouble for it. i believe that breaks certain gov't approval for a bailiff company/firm regulations/laws  if memory serves me right?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mickc4 v yorkshire bank


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6071 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, i have been checking in and out recently just to see how ppl are doing against the Yorkshire Bank. I have got roughly, from what i read, about 3/4's of the way through my claim. I have filled in my OLMC and had a response of acknowledgement of intent to defend from the Clydesdale bank, i am now struggling to work out what to expect next, they have 28 days to provide a defence, i am seeking advise as to 1- what to expect and 2- how to respond? any help would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mickc4 the bank will send you a copy of their defence, probably at the last minute. In mine it states they dont know my account number or sort code even though I had informed them and had letters from them with account number on before. I just replied with information they wanted but stated they already had my details. Seems to be standard letter cos a few people on here have recieved the same. They will also send copy of defence to the court. Then you should hear from the court a few weeks after that. Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I am aslo fairly new to the site, I have claimed on mcol and just had a letter saying the case is bieng transfered to my town, and enclosed was a copy of defence.I also got one from the bankprevious to that. From what I can understand on the site, we send 2 copies to the court and they send it to the bank. There is a link on here to tell you what to do, I will look and get back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am waiting for a court date and further instructions from the court as to what to send. try looking at FAQs on here and other threads. by the way its 3 copies of everything 1 for yourself and 2 for court. dont worry someone on here will help you. just wait till you recieve the defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the defence i got is mainly that charges are correct according to terms and conditions but watch news today, yorkshire bank are disclosing actual costs of charges in court probably february, only saw last bit so will be watching later. one of mods said to carry on taking them to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Mickc4

Just an update, got a court date for 26 October so starting to prepare my bundle.Lots of ink and paper,got to send one to court 1 to bank and 1 for myself.Got quite a bit done and getting ideas of what to send from the site threads. I have recievved the usual letter from the bank saying they have reopened my case and are looking at it again. Wont hold my breath.

icon12.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hang in there it is a long process but you are nearing the touch line my court date is on 7th sept an started the process back in oct/nov last year claim was filed at court 29th march but it will be worth the wait to get our cash back i posted a list on my thread of what i put in my bundle so when you start preparing yours hope it helps i found that reading up an saving stuff for my bundle made me feel as if i was doing something as the time it takes to go through it all mashed my head good luck an you are so close now

 

all the best jeanette

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, just checked my OLMC and the 28 days they had to submit their defence has expired and i have filed for judjement by default giving them 14 days to pay the full amount, is this something you did as well i.e. part of the process or have they slipped up and missed the date?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

looks like they missed the date but I have read on here that the courts allow them a few days grace, but hopefully they wont and you will get your money. I have got a letter from bank saying they are applying for a stay till after the test case, so I may have long wait

alex

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mickc4

 

Todaywas the deadline for bundles to be in court, I took mine in on Friday but havent recieved one from YB. I rang the court and they havent got one, told me to ring back on Thursdayin case they have been delayed cos of postal strike. Thought that was 2 weeks ago. Doesn't look like the bank had any intentions of sending their bundles, as they said in the last letter from them, they will be applying for a stay.I found a letter on here by Garyh to send the bank giving 7 days to complyso I think I will send it off to them.

alex

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alex, i've received absolutly nothing so have gone for judgement by default via the OLMC, i got the copy from the courts sent to the bank, i have given them 14 days to pay in full. still no response a week later so hopefully??????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mick,

Fingers crossed for you to get your money, if they havent put a stay on my claim I hope to get it struck out against YB.I am sure you will hear after the 14 days are up if not ring the court again.

keep us informed.

Alex

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Having rang the court to find out where i stand, they advised that they(YB) hadn't as yet applied for the judgment to be set aside, asking their advice, which was not that helpful, i decided to issue a warrant yesterday 5-9-07 lets see what happens now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just gone home for lunch and found a copy of what the bank has sent to the court, asking for a stay on the grounds of an error in admin by them. i have already issued a warrant on the same day any ideas.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...