Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

delaying tactics


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6136 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi, i'm new to this site and need a bit of advice.

i started proceedings against alliance and leicester in march by firstly asking for all my statements or a list of all charges going back six years. i used a template from thisismoney website. i followed up a week later with a phonecall and was told the letter had been received and was being dealt with. in may i phoned again and was told the statements had been sent but i had received nothing so they said they would resend. i have still not received anything but have been told another 2 times that they have been sent and they were going to resend. after yet another call last week i got a letter this morning telling me that they have just received my request and once they receive my £10 they will collate and send the information request and this will take 40 days.

i am now fuming because they have been lying to me on the phone about sending the statements. their own letter proves that they had done nothing when they were telling me that they had sent stuff.

what can i do now. they were obviously acting illegally because they know they had 40 days to get the stuff to me and now after delaying for 3 months they are trying to get away with another 40 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Report then to the Information Commissioner they are clearly in breach of the terms of the Data Protection Act.

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

amazing, i sent them a nasty letter telling them how disgusted i was at the way they treat longstanding customers, i also mentioned that they had delayed for 3 months and if i didnt get my info within 10 days i was going to proceed with an estimated claim for £3000 (nowhere near what they owe me). plus a complaint to the commissioner. the statements have arrived 7 days later. so there is hope. the fact that i didnt send the cheque till my nasty letter doesnt seem to have mattered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...