Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. I am reading through the full thread and will continue to research. I have come across a reference to a form called N180 DQ in the thread, but I cannot see any reference to this form in my case nor can I see it on the MoneyClaim website. Should I have been sent this form? Thanks 
    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

My Landlord is seeking Possession!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6207 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

... well my girlfriend's landord has said he will issue my girlfriend with notice, 2 months into a 12 month agreement on the basis that the second month's rent is currently 1 week late, and will not be paid for another week.

Is he able to do this? I know a landlord is not supposed to be able to do this in the first 6 months, but does a late payment provide grounds for him to do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, her agreement is for 12 months. If the landlord wanted to evict her, the two months notice would have to be served in the tenth month of her tenancy, to expire on the twelfth. She cannot be evicted without a Possession Notice, which the landlord has to go to court to obtain, and this process can be very lengthy. Any attempt to evict her by any other means is illegal, and can be reported to the Police and her local Council Housing Office (even though it is a private tenancy).

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for you replies!

 

Unfortunately i have some new questions!

 

My girlfriend received a letter from her letting agency last night. They pointed to clause 8 in her contract and said she is in breach of this. this claus especifies that she shall not sublet, etc, and that she will not be living there. They have said that there was a man living there (Me) and that this is in breach. Obviously i have stayed round there alot, but i am certainly not living there! Do you know how they can prove this? and is it unlawful or wrong for them to threaten serving notice based on clause 8 if she does not pay by wednesday?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subletting involves taking rent from someone. They're clutching at straws here, because they have to prove it before they can say she's breaking it. She has the right to quiet enjoyment of the property, and that includes having guests to stay overnight or for a short time; it is nothing to do with the agents or the landlord who you have in your house. I would advise that she write a letter to them stating that she has never sublet the property and invite them to provide proof of this allegation. Remind them of the right to quiet enjoyment that allows her to treat the property as her own as long as the conditions are not broken, and that having guests to stay overnight on occasion is part of that right of quiet enjoyment. Again, they cannot evict her full stop without a court order. I would advise her local Council's Housing Officer of the situation, and also contact Shelter for a second opinion.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a mandatory ground for possession and that is that at the date proceedings are begun and at the date of the hearing at least two months' rent is in arrear.

 

There are two discretionary grounds. One is that some rent is outstanding at the date proceedings are begun and at the date of the hearing. The other is that the tenant is persistently late in paying rent.

 

Your girlfriend has not been there long enough to be persistently late. She does not owe two months' rent. No court will grant possession if the rent is only a week or two late. In any event, you girlfriend can get rid of the problem by paying the rent and making sure she always pays on time.

 

Sharing occupation is not subletting. Some tenancies ban sharing occupation. What amounts to sharing occupation is a question of degree and, it has to be said, common sense, particularly when the tenancy is residential. No court is ever going to allow a landlord to forfeit a tenancy if person shares with his/her partner. Taking in a lodger would be different

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...