Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

40 days - no response


wordword
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5893 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Sent the ‘Preliminary Approach’ letter and received a standard letter/leaflet in reply. It’s now been 14 days, so am about to send the ‘Letter Before Action’

  • Do I send this letter to the same address as the Preliminary Letter?

Head of Customer Relations

Barclays Bank plc

1 Churchill Place

London

E14 5HP

  • Should I include the 8% interest on my Schedule of Charges with this letter?

  • Also, I had to rework the letter template because they did reply…does this sound ok?

I am very disappointed that you have not responded positively to my letter of the 03rd July 2007, instead choosing to send a standard letter and leaflet in reply.

Thanks for your help in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

ok, sent my LBA letter, its been over 14 days (gave them a bit extra due to postal strikes)...just received the following letter...

 

...............................................................................

We refer to your complaint on bank charges. We believe that your complaint concerns the level, fairness or lawfulness of the charges.

 

We believe the charges are legal, fair and transparent

 

Since we last wrote to you, the bank (with several other banks) became involved in legal proceedings with the office of fair trading (oft) on bank charges which we believe will resolve the legal issues about the fairness and legality of your bank charges.

 

It would be our normal approach to resolve your complaint through our internal complaints process as quickly as possible. However, until the determination of the legal issues in the above proceedings, we have asked the financial services authority (fsa) to suspend the normal timetable for dealing with bank charges, and the fsa has agreed to this request to condition that protect your rights.

 

We can assure you we have registered and stored your complaint. Please retain your bank records, as this will make it easier for you to support your complaint on resolution of the test case.

 

Once the legal proceedings between the oft and the banks finish, we will resolve your complaint as quickly as possible.

 

We are sorry that we have not been able to respond in full to your complaint now, but we (together with the fsa and the oft) think that it is necessary to resolve the key legal issues before we decide how we should respond to your complaint.

 

Obviously exactly what will happen next will depend on the courts. We do not know how long the case will take - we have promised to proceed as quickly as possible but inevitably given the importance of the issues being considered this may take many months to finally resolve. But we can assure you that once the legal proceedings are completed we will resolve your complaint as quickly as possible. If at the stage you do not agree with our conclusions you will of course be able to refer your case to the financial ombudsman service (fos) (or to the courts).

 

Should we decide to refer your case to the financial ombudsman services (fos), you should be aware that we have asked both the fos and the courts not to proceed with any other case they are hearing until the test case is resolved. The fos has indicated as a general proposition that it will indeed not proceed with cases which rely on the legal issues being considered in the test case.

 

Similarly, you should be aware that if you choose to issue a claim in the county courts, the bank will immediately apply to the courts for an order to stay your action until resolution of the banks proceedings with the oft.

 

We will keep you updated appropriately about the proceedings with the oft. You can also check the latest position on our website.

 

The fsa requires us to ensure that your complaint will not be adversely affected by the delay in dealing with it.

 

...............................................................................

 

not sure what to do, should I move to the next step - issue a court claim???

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your replies, im gonna go for it...:?:roll:

 

i have to now issue a court claim, i understand that its not advised to file claims online through MCOL (courts are frequently threatening to strike out claims filed by MCOL, due to the shortened particulars of claim, and because a list of charges cannot be included)

 

I will therefore use a N1 form..Im trying to reclaim charges from Barclays, so should I use the

 

Particulars of claim - N1 - hard copy version

 

or the

 

## New POC for N1 Barclays bank ## in the (Bank Templates Library)

 

  • Do I post this (how many copies?) to my local county court?

  • Do I need to send it with a covering letter?

  • Should I send it to a particular person/position?

  • Do I enclose a cheque? if so, who should i make it payable to?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok you need 3 copies of everything ... to send/take to your local county court

As i took mine in person i just handed them in to the woman on reception and paid in cash so that it could be processed and issued immediately

Dont forget to include 3 copies of you schedule of charges

 

and use the New POC's that are specific to Barclays :)

 

Hope that covers everything :)

 

Saint

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi,

 

still debating whether to issue the court claim, spoke to a solicitor but he didnt really have any advice.

 

The way i see it, I could spend £100+ issueing the claim, barclays are likely to ask for a stay to see what happens with the test case...if they win, then ive lost the court fee...

 

However, if they lose the case then they will have records of my claim (LBA etc) and will pay up. so is it worth just waiting for the result of the test case.

 

Is there a certain amount of time to complete this process? i.e. if I sent the LBA 2 weeks ago, do I have to issue court claim within a certain time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

still debating whether to issue the court claim.

 

How far back are you claiming ?

Any OFT/Bank agreement will undoubtedly include the limitations act

(6 years).

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the solicitor did ask if the test case had any relevance to my case...

 

I basically am claiming loads of 'Paid Refereals' caused by unauthorised overdraft.

 

not sure where i stand with this...

 

i can imagine going to court, and them saying it was my own fault i kept getting charged?!?!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi,

 

In June 2007 I had reached the point in the reclaim process where I had sent my LBA letter and had received a standard letter in reply. The next stage was to issue a court claim.

 

I debated whether to issue the court claim, spoke to a solicitor but he didn’t really have any advice. A few things in my personal life happened and this was all put on hold. I’m now ready to carry on with the claim however,

 

Is there a certain amount of time to complete this process? i.e. if I sent the LBA June last year, can I still issue a court claim now? Or should I re-start process again?

 

I’m still incurring paid referrals – however my documentation only looks from July 2002 to June 2007. Will any further charges (after June 2007 to present day) be taking in consideration and also refunded?

Should I issue the court claim, or wait and see what happens in the test case?

 

If the banks lose, will they just refund charges as standard to all customers, or only to those that have issued a court claim?

 

Appreciate any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can add the newer charges onto you scedule of charges right up until you submit to court.

 

As its been so long since you sent the LBA I would be tempted to resend the LBA with the updated SOC's then file at court.

 

The templates at the moment are ofline being reworked due to the outcome of the OFT case hopefully they will be back online soon.

 

The LBA is also in Wiki here:

Letter Before Action - Consumer Wiki

 

but bear in mind this is the old version. otherwise wait a few days for an updated version following the OFT judgment in the Bank Library

 

 

saint

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...