Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • Thanks DX,   I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wednesday1867 Vs MBNA PPI (No Agreement info needed)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6133 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Colin Pugh is the man when it comes to refunding charges, im gonna email him a copy of my letter and see if he can work his magic on this :D

 

Hiya Wednesday,

 

I love your determination expecially with mbna. They are renowned for their non-compliance and dragging their heels.

 

I wish you the very best of luck in your fight:-D

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Battle may not be over :D

 

While ive been with MBNA, i was charged in the region of 40 times for being over my limit, something im not proud of, i was paying the minimum or a bit over, but with the charges, it kept getting higher, anyhow i asked about the terms of the PPI and if it would be void when i was over my limit, this is the paragraph they reply to that

 

 

 

Strange the months statements they sent me, was the month i had asked for the PPI to be cancelled :D

 

I need someone elses interpretation of what that paragraph says, i read it as in the months i didnt pay, i didnt get charged, i did tho :confused:

 

Or does it say every month i was charged for being over the limit i shouldnt of been charged PPI as the account was in arrears?

 

Or does it say every month i was charged a late fee, the account was in arrears, so i shouldnt have been charged?

 

Bottom line is, i was charged every month til i cancelled it.

 

Just dont know what to come back at them with :confused:

Hello Wednesday,

 

Is it really true that you ticked the box for ppi, are you 100% sure of it.

 

Was it on the pre-contractual credit application form (with of course all the prescibed terms) or on a actual true enforcable credit agreement.

 

You do have all of your statement showing that although you had exceeded your credit agreement (naughty)and the ppi was void (according to them) they still took the ppi payments.

 

You have stated "Just dont know what to come back at them with:-?

 

You had answered your own question with

 

Bottom line is, i was charged every month til i cancelled it.

Keep at them sorry shouting:-D

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well no opinions on the paragraph :(

 

Im gonna get the letter above in the post Monday and see what happens. :)

 

Hello Wednesday,

 

Well you have been a busy little bee:D

 

Few points to raise.

 

1. Did you do a SAR,

 

2. The application/agreement does it contain all of the prescribed terms to make the agreement enforcable???? This is very important, does it state credit limit, interest rate and when and how payments are to be made.

 

3. Did the lovely young lady tick the box or did you (whilst she flickered her eyelashes at you). Did she explain the ppi. Did you received any policy or terms and conditions with the ppi.

 

4. You have stated that if the account was over the limit, the ppi would be void, but they still took payments. Where does it state this?????

 

5. Did they breach the cca request?????

 

Can you get back to me on these points:grin:

  • Haha 1

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Wednesday,

 

MMMMmmmmhhh it looks as though you signed to apply for a credit card to me. I cannot see any prescribed terms on this.

 

Personally I would post it on the Consumer Credit Act thread and ask for more comments. I looks like under section 127 it would be unenforcable, but we need further clarifiication. Sorry my pc is playing up so I cannot delete any errors. Forget for the moment re the overlimit/ ppi void issue until we get confirmation as the enforcebility of the credit/application issue. Also mention the error in the date, this is important.

 

If no-one makes a comment on the cca thread( they tend to get a bit wrapped in their discussions) pm either peterbard, davefirewalker, rory 32 or ODC they are very knowledgable:grin:

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...