Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

B&Q conservatory nightmare


albeck
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4559 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

We ordered a 4 meter square conservatory from B&Q 8 months ago, while we were awaiting it's delivery I went on B&Q's website to check some details, only to find it was a 4 by 2.6 meter conservatory and not 4 meter square, this was B&Q's mistake and they had over sized it in their store catalogue and the website dimensions were the correct one's. As we had already laid the base we had to pay B&Q another £700 for the correct size.

Now 8 months on the now erected DIY conservatory has started to leak from the bottom sill and ruined the flooring (this is the second time). We contacted B&Q and were told it has nothing to do with them, it's their suppliers fault Cestrum. We then contacted Cestrum Conservatories and after giving them our order ref numbers etc, were told it was our fault as it had been installed incorrectly, they then dropped another bomb shell and said it was not their conservatory. Back at B&Q they had yet again contacted Cestrum who has now admitted it is their conservatory and will come and inspect it at a cost of £150 because they are sure the fault is with our installation, B&Q have now stopped answering the phone to us and Cestrum just hang up as soon as we speak.

Trading Standards have told us to draft a letter to B&Q which we shall do and send it recorded. However both B&Q and Cestrum have both told us in no uncertain terms the fault is with our installation without even looking at it, they now want £150 to just inspect it, this feels almost like blackmail and we feel intimidated by their attitude. Has anyone else had these kind of problems?

The conservatory was sold as a self build and the very detailed instructions were followed to the letter, however because of it's construction method which involves clipping plastic covers over everything it cannot hope to become water tight and the design seems flawed.

Thanks for any advice or suggestions Alan

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

this could be a problem with the installation i have worked in this industry since 1988 and the common thing that most people miss is to seal the external cill to the window along the back and the horns this will allow water penitration to the property if not done correctly

the cill should also be sealed at all joints and i would recommend using low mod silicone as opposed to high

 

:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

I didn't get my conservatory from B&Q but it was from Cestrum. It also leaks in exactly the same place as yours does/did. I had a local surveyor inspect the construction and his conclusion was that the conservatory was a poor design - being reliant on silcone for weather tightness. It was NOT a construction issue but a design one. The company did not reply to the surveyor's letters and now I find that the company has gone into receivership - so much for a 10 year guarantee. So my only solution is to reapply mastic every few years and floor the conservatory with tiles making mopping up of water easier. Did you get any joy to your enquiries?:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a local surveyor inspect the construction and his conclusion was that the conservatory was a poor design - being reliant on silcone for weather tightness. It was NOT a construction issue but a design one.

 

:???:

 

I am wondering how it might be possible to design a conservatory that would not rely upon a sealant.

 

Is it possible to identify a product with the same purpose, that does not rely upon a sealant, to compare the one with the other?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Conservatory nightmares are worryingly common. I used Kent Conservatory Company and it was an absolute disaster. £12k down the drain and not even a hint of a conservatory. Contract was cancelled and the 16 months on, the best offer they've made of a settlement is less than £1k.

 

To publicise experiences - I started a twitter feed @conservatory_co. tweet me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...