Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • There are so many factors, and local elections are often far more about local issues and people, but the one previously general rule in a general election are that the hard core Tories vote Tory and hard core Labour voters vote labour   Gaza seems to have dulled both the muslim and Jewish labour votes more than the Tories - and I can see why - but do the muslim voters really think that the Tories will do ANYTHING other than talk and then do whatever the Americans say - and thats support Israel whatever they do first and foremost in real terms? Reform has unquestionably affected the Tory local vote - so should affect the GE vote a bit more, but has largely been factored in - reform isnt new in any way - its all Brexitish although there seem to be far more ex 'conservative' core reform/ukip/brexitish voters than ex 'labour' core voters - about 6-8% of the national vote in a GE seems to me. A little up on prior brexitish/faragits scores But the large swathes of center ground voters who decide who wins the election seem to have utterly deserted the Tories in their millions - although they have gone to labour, libdems and greens - and mant real conservatives are in limbo despite Sunak being naturally more a thatcherite than most - his party currently seems far less so. Johnson promised much, and many were taken in, just as people (inc me) made that mistake with Farage in the early days - but we now know that they are self serving liars who can't be trusted with anything - although I still think it likely The Liar will be back - but most likely after the GE (60/40) Starmer is lacking in charisma and presence, but others in his cabinet should shine. But Corbynistas could still cause trouble - another group that seem happy to drag everything down if they think it suites   Johnson perhaps could reunite some of the Tory party - but he seems to have numerous criminal and political convistions sitting in the background should he try Lying about giving preference to dogs in the Afghan evacuations - and lying about it Unlawfully proroguing parliament embezzlement re funds and spending (eg flat referb) .. repeatedly Taking jobs before he should after being booted - should lose his PM pension and rights over that IMO the list goes on ad nauseam
    • Hi I am negotiating with my ex (commercial) landlord's solicitor for a debt I owe for rent. This has been going on for a little while and I expect they may go ahead with the court action they threaten. I wanted to ask however, In the event this action goes ahead, I think will have a response pack sent to me from the court, along with the claim. Google tells me that a section of this response pack is a 'Admit the claim and ask for time to pay'. Would this time to pay, if accepted also mean a CCJ registered against me? Thanks
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Had identical situation with chairs I bought from eBay. I was directed to Shiply by seller. Contracted Fauzer via  Shiply platform. Basically  Shiply  engages fraudsters to deliver your goods and makes a profit too. Still no chairs in sight. Who is responsible for this fraud? 
    • Thanks @AndyOrch No permission was given to leave the property. I accpeptliability. I was just hoping that I could limit the damage / court action by negotiating a lower settlement with the landlord.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Jibba v Barclays - **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6189 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I am due in court with Barclays tomorrow at 12.00.

 

Neither myself or the court have received a bundle or anything. I have not been contacted by Barclays - I thought they would have made an offer by now. The money has not been put in my account either as of 14.00hrs today.

 

I have sent the bundle and done everything I should, bit nervous about going to court, but they seem to have settled with everyone else - why not me!

Barclays Bank

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

 

Barclaycard

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

28/11/2006 Copy statements received

28/11/2006 Give me £399.72 or else

 

Halifax Credit Card 1

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

 

Halifax Credit Card 2

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

 

Marks and Spencer Credit Card

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

 

Halifax Bank

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

 

Morgan Stanley Credit Card

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

 

West Bromwich Building Society

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

 

Endeavour Personal Finance

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try phoning B's litigation team ask them if they intend turning up in court tomorrow

chances are they will settle to have an updated SOC .... and dont settle for anything less than you are happy with

Krysta Campbell

Barclays

Litigation and Disputes

1 Churchill Place

LONDON

E14 5HP

Tel: 02071164753

Fax: 01452638359

email:krysta.campbell@barclays. com

Link to post
Share on other sites

i agree with Saintly, [always gets in first...lol]

 

have a read of a recent posting of mine:

I suggest you bit the bullet and contact the Litigation Team, Go through Krysta, asking to speak to the person who is handling your claim,

 

Start with referring to your claim number and the court date at which ever court being heard by District Judge ………

 

Go on to say……

I realise from your defence that you do not agree with my legal analysis that the charges levied to my account amount to penalty clauses and are deemed unfair. I do however recognise the fact that the sum at issue between us is relatively modest and as such, it is not cost effect for either party to take the matter to trial. Therefore in order to avoid the inevitable time and cost associated with pursuing the claim to trial I am willing to settle the claim upon repayment of the charges applied to my account, together with statutory interest and costs totalling £xxx.xx.

Only once in receipt of cleared funds I will discontinue all action against Barclays in connection with this claim

[[this is taken from THEIR agreement letter]]

 

They are a very helpful and polite team.

 

I know this is going to be very daunting, but have a read through some recent posts.

Caz V Barclays / Woolwich **WON**

Woodentop v Barclays **WON**

What do i do next ?? Woolwich haven't filed defence**WON**

And many more.

 

Everyone that has followed this advice is very pleased they did.

 

One thing to remember b4 contacting them is to have your updated figures in front of you and settle only with what you are happy with,

If they do arguing the toss which isnt very often simply say thank you for your time I think I'll let the judge decide goodbye, hang up and they will contact you back.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Better than I thought! Rang them they offered to settle £860 which is the full amount plus interest - I asked them about the cost of the court file, court fee, etc and they offered to settle £1100!!

They have emailed a letter which I have signed and sent back!

Thanks for everything, donation on its way if and when cheque clears!

Barclays Bank

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

 

Barclaycard

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

28/11/2006 Copy statements received

28/11/2006 Give me £399.72 or else

 

Halifax Credit Card 1

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

 

Halifax Credit Card 2

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

 

Marks and Spencer Credit Card

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

 

Halifax Bank

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

 

Morgan Stanley Credit Card

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

 

West Bromwich Building Society

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

 

Endeavour Personal Finance

21/11/2006 Sent Subject Access Request

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...