Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, welcome to CAG. Can you tell us more about what happened please? Who stopped you and which shop? Best, HB
    • You don't mention what the debts are, which is important, as it really depends on the details in deciding best course of action. So list types of debt e.g credit card, type of loan, utility bill; current owner bank or dca; approximate amount for each debt.  And do you own any property assets. There is no blanket advice regarding all types of debts. Whoever you contact regarding debt advice would want to know all of the information. The debt buying businesses deal with multi billions worth of debts. They can't issue Court claims for most debts as the cost of pursuing would be ruinous and don't have staff resources. Instead they rely on credit records being impacted and therefore people need to resolve the debts. And they rely on anxious debtors paying amounts after receiving threatening communications. If you know you are likely to be made redundant, start looking for other employment soon. Due to longer recruitment processes being followed by employers, it can take about 3 months between applying and starting a new job.
    • Hi I was caught shoplifting 4 items £20 worth, I’m petrified the Police will come to my house now please can you help. What can I do I worried about my job. 
    • I heard nothing more from J&P but have now had an email from the bank saying they have instructed IDR to act on their behalf?  so are they just passing it back? Selling it on again? I don’t know if this is a good or bad thing 
    • I posted a couple of years ago about our debt situation and have been trying to pay off our debt as best we can. It is a possibility I maybe made redundant in a few months time, so I am trying to find out everything I can about what happens in today’s world when you can’t pay. I keep finding conflicting advice on various sites so I wanted to post this quote to get thoughts. It claims basically that the dca will likely get enforceable documents these days and therefore it’s likely you will have to pay dca at some point during the 6 year process.    on here I read a lot of comments assuming the exact opposite of this. A lot of the threads on here state the beginning of the process but I never see conclusive stuff about what happened from start to finish to get insight into whether debts post 2015 have been enforced etc. I hear a lot here not to pay dca companies but most my debts are post 2015 debts I am all up to date on our debts but if I lose my job it is likely I’ll end up where I tried to avoid in the first place. Which is destroying our files and dealing with DCA. I’ll post it below so you can see what I mean.   It is likely that any debts incurred after 2007 will end up with all the documentation being provided and being enforceable. Therefore you should use the time while awaiting responses going through your Income & Expenditure and considering any possiblity of making a full and final settlement. It can take a number of months to reach the stage of a hearing date and exchange of witness statements and normally you would be able to settle or come to an arrangement to pay before the court hearing, once documents have been provided, although this isn’t guaranteed.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mr&Mrs B v Clydesdale (FOS)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6225 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just to bring you up to speed this is where we're up to:

 

08/01/07 – S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

 

19/02/07 – Having received statements, sent off 1st letter. At this stage the whole issue of using more than one small claim hadn’t really become a problem so, we intended to claim using several small claims. In the letter we did only specifically refer to the charges in our first small claim (incurred in 2002) not the total amount we would be pursuing.

 

21/02/07 – Received the usual fob-off from our branch manager. T’s & C’s blah blah in fact anyone who’s written to the Clydesdale re. charges will no exactly the letter we mean but obviously just in an attempt to prove just how incompetent they are, the opening paragraph said “…..I note from your letter that you feel excessive charges were applied to your bank account during the last 15 months”!?!?

 

26/03/07 – Sent LBA to Customer Relations however, having taken account of the advise on the Forum, we revised the basis of our complaint in that we were looking for the total amount of the charges applied to our account since Feb 2002 and that if we didn’t receive a response within 8 weeks (by 21st May - we were trying to cover our backs basically, thought that because we were revising the complaint that it might not count as a continuation of the existing complaint) we would refer our complaint to the FOS.

 

11/04/07 – Hadn’t heard a dicky bird so thought we better get in touch just to be sure they’d received our letter. Phoned Customer Relations - they had and it had been forwarded to the Advice Quality Unit – Charges Section in Leeds. The very helpful bloke said that we should get a letter confirming everything but they were unfortunately very busy. Wonder why?!?!?!

 

16/04/07 – Sure enough letter received from Charges Section in Leeds confirming re-opening of complaint.

 

09/05/07 – Received a letter saying that our 8 weeks had now lapsed and the investigation is still ongoing, hope to be able to issue a final response within the next 4 weeks. If you’re not happy with the progress to date you can refer the matter to the FOS.

 

So, how to proceed? Do you think we should give them until the 21st May before sending the forms etc. to the FOS, as that’s what we said we’d do in our letter. Not because we want to give them more time just because it might not look good for us.

 

Secondly, what do we include in the FOS complaint form and as supporting documentation. Do we describe the complaint as we do in the letters e.g. referring to common law and UTCCR or more generally. Do we send copy statements etc. etc. There's loads of info on here about the court process but not so much about undertaking the FOS route.

Thanks look forward to your thoughts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it doesnt look like you have followed the step by step instructions, or the tried and tested methods so far, but, never the less, i would advise you stick to the timescale you have laid down to them and proceed with your next step.

I would forget worrying 'how things look'. At this stage i dont believe anyone will be paying particular attention to your claim, they are dealing with so many yours is unlikely to be singled out for personal attention.

If you are going down the FOS route good luck, i personally havent used it, but i believe if you use the search function above, you may find more info to help you with the form filling.

 

All the best

 

S

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two reasons for using the FOS is:

1. You don't need to go to court or fill in court forms

2. The bank gets fined £400 for each complaint the FOS investigates.

 

Downside is it can take longer than the court route.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we have stuck to the step by step instructions as best we can in the circumstances. We are looking for >£3k back therefore "tried and tested" ain't going to cut it with this crew as they'll defend against split claims so we deviated very slightly and timescales slipped as we waited the outcome of some of the bod's cases on here. We have followed the step by step instructions to the letter on our IF claim and it worked but Clydesdale are a different kettle of fish and we did what we thought was best so that we can get all our money back.

 

We're finalising our FOS complaint and will get it sent off in line with our timescales ie. 21/05 and see what happens. I'm not expecting we will get any personal or preferential attention just so long as we get our money back that's the main objective.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks look forward to your thoughts.

 

What the point on asking for peoples thoughts, and then going on the defensive when someone give's there opinion?

 

It doesnt matter how much you are claiming, the step by step instructions and tried and stested methods are exactly the same for everyone, up until the point of issuing the court claim.

 

Thats means, sending the template prelim letter, and giving them 14 days. Sending your LBA and giving them a further 14days to refund your charges, then issuing your court claim OR going down the FOS route.

 

It doesnt matter who the bank is or how much the claim is for, we are all in the same boat.

 

Never the less i wish you all the best with your claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasn't being defensive. I was trying to clarify the circumstances surrounding why we had moved away from tried and tested. I appreciate we are all in the same boat and their is a process (which we have used when dealing with IF) but the main reason we modified in this case was because of the experiences others have had (and shared) on this site when dealing specifically with Clydesdale. Sorry you disagree with how we handled things but what's done is done if this was wrong then we'll live with the consequences. As I said, we did what we thought was best and we are by no means experts. Maybe you're right, maybe we should have stuck with tried and tested. Anyway, no hard feelings and may all your claims be successful ones :)

Does anyone have any advise on completing FOS forms? I've done a search but can't seem to find anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The FOS forms are located here our complaints procedure and how to complain towards the bottom of the page. If you have a specific problem with what to fill in on the form just post.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...