Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help! Ltsb Defending Claim! (scotland)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6213 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, just picked up on this thread.

From what i can see your hubby has done this all wrong, who ever advised him has also got it all wrong.

If i make this out right, your hubby has made 3 different claims against LTSB on the one account, at the one time? have i got that right?

If this is the case someone has not read the step-by-step instructions, or the rules of engagement or any of the advice found in the FAQ's.

 

If someone decides to make multiple claims (like i did), it is important to wait till the first is settled in full before issuing the next court claim. The reason being, the bank can ask the court to take the 3 claims into consideration, basically roll them into one and bang you have a Ordinary Cause Action on your hands. The reasons the bank can do this is to save the costs of defending the multiple claims individually, and the can also persaude the court they will also being saving the costs of hearing the claims.

 

If the bank were to take the action above your hubby would be left in a position were he would require a lawyer, as only a lawyer can bring a O.C action before the court. This wouldn't seem so bad if you could find a friendly lawyer, but, the consequences of losing an O.C action are great, and should you lose, you would be liable to pay costs and expenses which could be hefty.

 

From my experience with LTSB, on both occasions they paid the full amount of my claim into my bank account 2 days before the date of the prelim hearing. I would suggest your hubby checks his bank account regularly for any deposits.

 

If the money does not appear or you dont receive a letter of offer from the bank before the hearing, if it was me, i would turn up at court never the less, but i would be fully prepared to ditch the case should things show signs of turning belly up.

Remember this IS just prelim hearing, and nothing will be decided for or against you.

The 'evidence' you should take is basically a breakdown of the info from your statement of claim. if you have used Scotias template, make notes from it i.e you believe the charges are a penalty and as such they are unenforceable blah blah.

 

I hope this has a positive ending, and i will be following with interest

 

Good luck

 

S

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, If the £1500 is before interest, from what i can see then the worst the judge could do would be to lump them into a summary cause.

 

If it was me, i would just sit tight and play it by ear, i am confident you will have a positive outcome, (eventually ;-)

 

Just keep an eye on the bank balance in the meantime

 

S

Link to post
Share on other sites

To answer your Q.s read this ~~~> http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/sheriff/small_claims/forms/going_to_court.pdf

 

This is straight from court website and should tell you all you need to know.

 

I understand your hubby has mish mashed his way through this so far, but if you are going to issue a court claim, you should always expect to have to appear, even if it is VERY rare. I have only heard of a handful of cases, and generally, it is only because the banks are so busy they have allowed certain cases to slip through the net and not be dealt with properly.

 

As i have said before, keep checking the bank balance, stranger things have happened. And it might be worth phoning the bank or there solicitors and reminding them that they have a court date for tomorrow, in case they have genuinely missed this one.

 

Remember, it is a prelim hearing for a small claim, you are not liable for anything and worst case scenario is you lose your court fee, i wouldnt consider throwing the towel in just yet ;-)

 

Incidently, which court is it again??

 

I shall see if i can get a mod to give you some encouragement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what it is supposed to mean, what i did was just fired my next claim straight into the court without hesitation.

 

A while back when more people were making multiple claims, they would send the letter back with the points they didnt like scored out and initial'd.

 

Janet-M took them to task and insisted on the settlement being without condition, dont know if it made any difference to her in the end, just the principle i think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The settlement date is the date they pay your claim.

 

Some banks like the yorkshire and clydesdale banks have been defending second claims on the same account, on the basis that you should have claimed all your charges in a one'r.

 

LTSB have not jumped on this band wagon yet, so, taking into consideration all the things you have been through so far, i would suggest if you have more charges to reclaim, you get the claim in asap.

 

I know you had two claims in at the one time and the first has been settled, when is the second due??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats great news, they settled bot your claims at once, i didnt realise that!!

 

Yes get your next claim in ASAP.

 

dont worry about any more LBAs or anything, they have had enough time, and seeing as they are still charging you means they have not learned a lesson.

 

To be honest, i wouldnt bother with a letter RE the conditions, unless the letter says you have an amount of time to respond i.e if we dont hear from you in 8 weeks we will take it you have accepted the conditions blah blah

 

And finally, dont worry, they cant take your money back again ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...