Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • He is still trading.   I won't get anything out of it, no.  But is that the point?  Not charging it means the Govt misses out on important revenue 
    • for whatever reason, if you did not get the original PCN on the car/by hand nor in the post before things escalated you need to appeal using the correct forms, not a soft appeal to the issuing council Which forms to use for which offence pe2/3 & te7/9 - Local Authority Parking and Traffic Offences - Consumer Action Group  
    • as this situation has now come up again for you, how confident are you that if you get on the straight and narrow with having a respite of 60days (Options for dealing with your debts: Breathing Space (Debt Respite Scheme) - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)... would you then be able to resume ok? if not quite honestly, the very best thing you can do is to get ALL your debts defaulted by the issuance of and the registering of a Default Notice from each creditor. this is done by stopping ALL PAYMENTS, it wont hurt you short term, esp as all the debts are still with the Original Creditors. this of course will kill credit for 6yrs, but, will cause the debts to vanish from your file (paid or not, paying or not) on the DN's 6th B'day, but of course that wont mean the debts are not still owed, legally, just your file will be clear of them all. if you read a good 10-20 of the stories in this very same forum you found to start yours, you'll soon get the idea behind the advice given. as for things like IVA/BK etc NEVER EVER do those, that secures unsecured debt. just contact one of the free DMP providers and get breathing space implemented, that gives you a 60 day buffer to firm up your future actions. but DO NOT enter into a DMP, do one yourself. they can be a bit pushy, but simply insist you just want breathing space invoked, i would only be giving them enough info to achieve BS too, don't give them anything you don't need too, they are funded by the banks and debt collectors and can sometimes be over intrusive and nosy wanting info that is better not revealed. dx    
    • “Not realising it was a no parking zone” doesn’t help you if the timing is correct, as (at least, on Google Maps / View) there is clear signage ('7am to midnight', parked at 15:22) What might be worth pursuing is the "ticket handed to driver" aspect : do you have any view on why they would be  stating that?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Court forms received


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6221 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, am new to this so be gentle with me. Received today a 'judgement for claimant ' form., from a northampton county court. Looking at it its from a catalogue, la redoute, which I thought I had paid up thru an dept company, not sure of name, and have no records of payment except unless I contact my bank for statements showing the standing orders. Anyway, now they want £89.85 for dept and interest to date of judgement and a further £92.00 costs, totalling £181.85.

 

This forms on its own with a girobank attachment at the bottom,

 

so 1/ is this a real form, or is it a try on?

 

2/ what do I do next.

 

3/ do I assume this has already gone to court, received no letters before and moved 6 months ago, assuming old house tenants gave them this new address.

 

4/ Also letter in my previous name, ?

 

help please, thanks karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) It sounds like a real form if it is titled judgement for claimant. In the bottom lefthand corner there should be N30 (3). This is the court number for this type of form.

 

2) What does the judgement say? e.g is it asking you for immediate payment ( forthwith judgement )? This would be likely if you didn't have the original claim form to respond to.

 

There are applications you can still make to court at this time but this will relaly depend if you intend to try to defend the original claim ( so application for a set aside ). Or if you feel that you don't want to go the route of disputing the claim & getting the info you can apply for a redetermination of the judgement ie ask to pay in instalments. Really depends what route you want to go down.

 

3) This is the CCJ which has been issued against you; by thye sounds of it the claim form will have gone to your old address. As long as the forms were posted to your last known address then they are deemed to have been served.

 

4) Surname or first name?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) It sounds like a real form if it is titled judgement for claimant. In the bottom lefthand corner there should be N30 (3). This is the court number for this type of form.

 

2) What does the judgement say? e.g is it asking you for immediate payment ( forthwith judgement )? This would be likely if you didn't have the original claim form to respond to.

 

There are applications you can still make to court at this time but this will relaly depend if you intend to try to defend the original claim ( so application for a set aside ). Or if you feel that you don't want to go the route of disputing the claim & getting the info you can apply for a redetermination of the judgement ie ask to pay in instalments. Really depends what route you want to go down.

 

3) This is the CCJ which has been issued against you; by thye sounds of it the claim form will have gone to your old address. As long as the forms were posted to your last known address then they are deemed to have been served.

 

4) Surname or first name?

 

Hi again,

 

1/ the bottom left hand corner no says N30 (CCBC)

2/the form says pay by instalments of £37.00 per month first payment by 6 june 2007.

4/ surname wrong a previous name given which I no longer use.

 

How do I go about getting the payment details of what I've paid? Think I shreaded some documents as I thought they were not needed.

thanks karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK - it is a court form ( sorry my mistake with the bracketed bit :o ) and they haven't got a forthwith judgement which is good. If the name is the name they would have had on theor records for you then it's not worth using this as a route to contest it.

 

I would do a CCA request to La Redoute ( the letter is on here somewhere but I'm really crap at posting links and stuff, sorry! ). Under Consumer Credit Act 1974 you have the right to a copy of the original credit agreement you signed and a breakdown of your account ie what have you paid.

 

If you feel that you would have had a good chance of succeeding if you had received the original court claim form ( ie you could have defended, or partly defended the claim ) you can apply to the court for a set aside. This puts the CCJ back to the claim stage giving you the chance to respond ( e.g. defend ). This will depend on the info you get from La Redoute I would assume.

 

You do need to be aware that if you are looking to defend a claim and you lose you will incur further costs and I would recommend you get proper legal advice ( someone on here will probably be able to help but I've only got a basic knowledge on defences ). In the meantime I would pay what the court has asked if you can afford to as if you default on this the creditor has the option of applying for enforcement action ( e.g. bailiffs, attachment of earnings ) against you.

 

Hope this isn't too depressing...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Update- have received today 30 may in reply to my cca letter saying 'thanks for your £10, this will reduce your dept to £171.85, you are in arrears by £10, and must be cleared immediately'.

 

So no reply to my CCA, and I have to the 6 june to pay my first payment of £37, so how can I be in the arrears!

 

What action next folks, want to say something on the line of 'you plonker that was for my cca details which you failed to do, you are supposed to have a B A in law, can't you read' in a posh way tho. Help,

 

thanks karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a deliberate tactic, either that or they are very very silly careless people as they have done the same to me and countless others !! Write to them pointing out their error and insist it is used for the purpose you sent it, ie a fee for them to provide the information you requested and not as a payment on the account. Then leave it at that but don't stop counting the 40 days from the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), this doesn't stop because they have done this, stick to your time limit, they are just trying to put you off !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick question re the judgement form, when judgement is made, who would forward this form to you.

Would it be sent by the Courts or would the Courts send the papers to the creditor for them to send on.

 

I am asking because some papers were sent to an old address for me which appeared to be a County Court summons but nothing was received from them afterwards. I didnt see them, was just told they were all returned "Not at this address" by estranged partner.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick question re the judgement form, when judgement is made, who would forward this form to you.

Would it be sent by the Courts or would the Courts send the papers to the creditor for them to send on.

 

I am asking because some papers were sent to an old address for me which appeared to be a County Court summons but nothing was received from them afterwards. I didnt see them, was just told they were all returned "Not at this address" by estranged partner.

 

The Judgement for Claimant is sent by the court. You would ususally get a claim form before any kind of hearing date. The papers are deemed to have been served if they have been sent to your last known address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...