Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Some advice please 1st direct


rob munro
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6216 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all

 

I posted this in General but with no success, then i found this little 1st dierct place, so maybe this is the best place for me.

 

Like a lot of people on here I wrote to my bank (1st direct) asking for a full refund of from overdraft charges. Most of my crazy period happened while at art school some years back, when I went way over my limit.

I calculated they owed me £1152.50 I got a reply yesterday; they worked it out at £1184 which is fair enough.

 

Now they went on to say the following –

 

In circumstances where you have authorised a payment that would, if met by us, lead to your account going overdrawn or to exceed an agreed overdraft limit, we have to consider whether to make this payment. A fee payable for this service provided by the bank, details of which are clearly set out in our account terms and conditions, a copy of which was provided to you when you opened your account. We are confident of our position and believe that if your claim for a refund proceeded to court, we would successfully resist any legal challenge in relation to these fees.

 

 

Sorry if that was long-winded, the next paragraph was about being mindful of management time and legal costs and are offering me £917 back that's £162 short of the full amount. The thing is this, would they actually win in court, I mean if their charges are illegal then surely they wouldn’t stand a chance. And if they’re prepared to give me back £917 why can’t they give me back the whole amount owed?

Are they just covering they’re rear-ends and sabre rattling at me and what would happen if I wrote back asking for the full amount, could they turn round and say deals off and I end up with nothing?

 

Who else here has received this kind of letter and what should my next step be?

 

Also I have to reply within 10 working days, now does it mean if I reply asking for the full amount and it goes over those 10 days they can turn round and say “sorry your times run out”

 

 

Thank you for your time

 

rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I had the same sent a reply back stating that I wanted a full refund with sentences from lba letter givining them an additional 14 days they received it on Sat gone, have just received offer for full amount today.

Stick with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I had the same sent a reply back stating that I wanted a full refund with sentences from lba letter givining them an additional 14 days they received it on Sat gone, have just received offer for full amount today.

Stick with it.

 

 

Hi Kitty

 

What's a lba letter, I'll try for the full amount my only fear is that they will wait out the 10 working days and say the deals off, that my time limit was up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-3-letter-before-action.html

 

LBA Letter Before Action.

 

This is saying your not happy with their explaination pay up now or face me in court.

If it goes to filing at court your amount claimed will then have interest added along with all court costs.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had the exact same letter today offering me £879, my claim was £1050 + £400 interest! I have already sent lba as the 14 days was up, letter sent the same day i sent lba so they made offer before recieving lba! I want to get the full amount but as above i don't want to risk getting nothing when i could have had £879! How do i word the letter rejecting this offer after already sending the lba? Any advice would be very welcome!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Neilp73

I know the feeling its like their daring and threating us at the same time, very neat!

Below is a response letter I've written today, I've not sent it because i want the same advice as you before doing so.

Response to settlement offer

Dear 1st Direct

Thank you for your reply in regards to the unlawful bank charges, I can’t accept this offer as a Full and Final offer, as part settlement yes but not full and final. You’ve offered me £917 that’s £162 short from the full amount you owe me which is £1079 so please repay me the proper amount; you wont go bust doing so, the payment of the full amount owed is the only fair and reasonable offer there is.

I look forward to a very speedy reply, with seven days, of receiving this letter. Plus this ten working days time limit, no offence but this is on my timetable, not yours! I except that to be cancelled, thank you.

As I say I will accept the sum of £917 offered, (you can credit it straight into my account?) but only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder, with a County Court claim if necessary, Which will include the 8% interest added, I don’t think either of us really want to go that far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theyre simply trying to pressure you into accepting their pathetic offer.

 

forget their deadlines, youre running this claim not them its your deadlines that matter not theirs.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejecting-offers.html

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to reject the offer and i am asking for interest as well! Do you think this will stop them making a second offer and force me to the court claim? Would have a better chance of getting a full offer without the interest?

 

The interest is roughly £500, the charges are £1050!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...