Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Appreciate your response BankFodder. I am aware that the Consumer Rights Act does not apply in my case as I operate a business and, instead, should rely on the Supply of Goods and Services Act and Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. I was a little unsure as, when I read the judgement of Hashim Farooq v EVRi Parcelnet, July 2023 I presumed that,  as Farooq had supplied laptops through Amazon,  the Consumer Rights Act would not apply but the judge refers to it in Section 22 as to why the claimant should be given judgment. Have I read this correctly? The reason for not offering full reimbursement was because I did not take out insurance for the full value.  In regards to correspondence from my customer,  I have emails from her in my timeline stating that she was waiting all week and that no one attempted delivery.  I have no doubt that she will be willing to corroborate the events with a written statement.
    • When you post information here you will have to post it in single file multipage PDF format. Follow the upload link. However, it would be more helpful if you could simply answer the questions that we have put to you and we can deal with paperwork afterwards if we think we need it.  
    • I was trying to post all the paperwork that I have, namely facebook ad, messages between the seller and my son etc . But I'm getting the message that the files are to large. 
    • First of all please can you tell us the name of the seller, something about the van – age/year, mileage, price paid. How far away is the seller from where your son lives? Who do you take it to for this inspection? Are they prepared to give you a written list of the things that they found? This is very important and you may well have to get an independent inspection from somebody such as the AA. This will cost you some kind of feedback we expect that we will be able to help you get it back. I would say that if you have to bring a court claim – which is likely – then your chances of success are better than 95% but the difficulty might be enforcing the judgement against the seller. We will have to no more in order to give you better advice. Does it have an MOT? What is the date of it and who gave it the MOT? I suggest that you start taking pictures of all of the defects that you can find.   Also I am going to say that I believe that you came over from Facebook where you were already informed that we would need at least all of the information which I have requested above. It will save a lot of time and effort for everybody if you can simply come up with the things that we ask without too much delay
    • My autistic son brought a van from a private seller. ( there was 5 other cars on his drive and another van, plus loads of machanic tools in his hallway,  so he probably is a unofficial dealer).  He gave the van a once over, he checked for any warning lights that might be on, there was none. He checked underneath for any rust etc, it all looked fine. The body was rough, but you'd expect that for the age of the van.  He got his brothers machanic to give it a pre mot check, as the van was old so he expected it to have a few problems. The van is a deathtrap, the seller had blacked out all the warning lights that were on the dash,  and I mean all.  He had also painted some kind of black stuff on the underside, to hide all the damage there.   My son drove it for over 2 hours to get it home. The machanic said he's surprised my son is still alive, and an untrained eye would not of seen what the seller had done.  Iv asked the seller for a refund and for him to have the van back, but he is refusing. Is there anything we can do.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A+L Card Debt sold to LINK


The Phantom
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5402 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It is interesting, because when I talked to the TS here in sunny Devon they asked where I got my advice from as it was all so far down the line already and I had done so much already. She said they usually just tell people to do what I had already done and then the problem resolves itself as the creditors normally comply. She said "we have never been down this route so far" and she had to talk to her supervisor and call me back. (Rural Devon, eh ?)

She did a while later and said they would have to pass this to the relevant TS for MBNA (I suppose Chester ?). But the person there handling MBNA complaints was on holiday until 12.04. so she would call her then and I would hear back from TS sometime after that date.

So maybe it is TS Chester who is refusing to act ? I will have to wait until they contact me again to find out, but if they refuse to act then of course I will join any complaint !!

I will update again at the time

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 210
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

In that case I can't actually say that this was the case today

The lady was quite interested and promised to follow it up with the other TS in (Chester ?) when that person is back from holiday and promised me a follow-up. She did acknowledge that the actions were indeed in breach of the CCA and that the creditor had now made the agreement unenforceable.

But I think I am now at the mercy of MBNA's local TS and have to wait a little longer to hear back

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a phone call from my local TS, they had a reply from Chester TS

Chester TS wants to know why I wanted to see a copy of the agreement in the first place anyway, so I said that's because the whole debt is in dispute

So apparently all TS Chester would consider doing in this case is phone MBNA on my behalf and ask them why they didn't send the agreement to me, but to do that they would need my authority , otherwise MBNA wouldn't have to discuss the issue with TS (?)

How pathetic is that. For me the matter is closed really, I have informed MBNA that I have stopped payments as they are in breach of the CCA 77/78 and have informed Trading Standards of this breach of the Act

I don't really care now why they didn't send the agreement and I think TS should follow this up as a general breach of the law and not just why they didn't boher to send me the agreement. (TS:"Oh, may I just ask why you didn't send Ms Owe-a-Lot a copy of the agreement ?" MBNA:"That's simply because we are MBNA, above the law and don't really care about you, the law or anybody else really either" TS: "Oh, that explains it then, many thanks, we will pass this on and close the case") ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nicole, you do sound cross and have every right to be. My advice would have been to have contacted the TS in your area. We know that Chester TS are in regular contact with MBNA and I don't trust that association, frankly. I suggest you find somebody as high as you can and send a written report.

 

Don't assume that MBNA won't come up with something, they may well do, but all may be not as it seems. Please do post or PM me when/if you receive anything.

 

You have done the right thing in informing MBNA what you have done and your reasons why. Just leave it now, the ball is in their Court.

 

Keep up the good fight, you are doing fine!!

 

Regards,

 

Corn x:)

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I will indeed let it be for now

I have done everything to the book and legally MBNA has turned the debt into an unenforceable one for the time being. I shall await in eager anticipation what they dig out of the early 1990s archives as and when they get around to it and if it is just an old application form , so much the better

I will report back with any new developments as and when they happen

It is quite ironic really that my local TS office seemed and still seems more eager than MBNA's local office, but as you said they are obviously in repeated contact with MBNA and got to know them quite well and my local TS said it is something that needs to be investigated by MBNA's Trading Standards office really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am pm'ing x

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so im not on my own with hassle from MBNA ive been trying to stop intrest paying £27 int a monthe late payment charges how can i pay late when ive a DMP with cccs , ive sent a DPA LAST THURS, im paying £20 each month the balance isnt going down cccs advice me not to stop paying them even though im not gaining, so will MBNA sent me my last 6 year statments ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you done your SAR yet ?

They finally sent me a brief list with charges once the Information Commissioner got involved

Their excuse for non compliance with my SAR to the Commissioner was I sent my SAR addressed to Alliance & Leicester Credit Card, but MBNA has bought them out, so it should have been addressed to MBNA (same address mind you) therefore they ignored my request and considered I never made one.

The information commissioner then told them by not informing me about the incorrect name / title they were n breach of a different section of the Data Protection Act

If they do not reply to your SAr get the Information Commissioner involved

The commissioner does monthly bulk complaints to MBNA as he gets so many these days for MBNA

With your list of charges you should then be able to work out how much exactly they owe you and then take the steps described here on the site

Link to post
Share on other sites

no i sent a DPA i

Abbey credit card,po box 1004

MBNA Europe bank ltd

chester business park

Chester CH4 9ww

 

Data Protection Act disclosure request

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER:

Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my account since, 07/04/01. Alternatively a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable. Furthermore please provide me with a copy of my/our contract with you, and a copy of my original terms and conditions. I make this request Under the Data Protection Act 1984 and 1998, and including the right of subject access under these acts.

Additionally where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my business with you.

If you are unable to supply data relating to manual intervention because there has been no such manual intervention then please be kind as to confirm this in your response to this request.

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10.00 to access ALL data held by (Abbey mbna) about myself. You should be fully aware of your statutory obligations under the data protection act and that any failure to comply to this request could result in an investigation from the Information Commissioners Office. You have 40 days in which to comply.

Furthermore, if I discover that you have levied disproportionate penalties against me then I shall be reclaiming them.

I am sure you are now aware that due to the sheer amount of these letters you receive plus the massive media attention, that every time you receive one of these letters it will be followed up by a request for a full refund of any disproportionate penalty charges, this will give you 14 days to do so before court action. Please note if I have to take court action to reclaim these charges then I will do so. Therefore, to save yourselves some time and money, if you could just refund all these charges dating back for the maximum 6 years immediately you will not incur the court fees, statutory interest pursuant to s69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum for which I would be entitled, nor costs for having to retain your own solicitors.

Such submissions from yourselves, that the relevant data is now only held on Microfiche in date order and can only be provided at extra cost etc is unacceptable as it implies that such data is nonetheless retrievable. In these circumstances, as opposed to copies of statements for the micro-fiched period, I will accept a detailed breakdown of all charges levied to my account in date order.

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

it looks like sar and cca is in the DPA MBNA are a obstacle ive just got some charges from nat west..

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I don't think the Information Commissioner needs to know why you want to do a DPA / SAr or what your background is, they will simply investigate the breach of the DPA if MBNA does not comply and remind them of their obligation. The information has to be supplied to you by law, your background is unimportant

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

have got a massive problem with MBNA, they have just sold a disputed and unenforceable debt (they didn't provide the original true signed agreement within the 12&30 days plus have not so far refunded unlawful charges levied) to LINK Financial

I haven't heard from Link yet, does anybody know this company and what to expect

Will also talk to Trading Standards on Monday ref their ongoing investigation, as I reported MBNA for CCA non compliance a while ago and now they topped it by selling the debt...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nicole

 

I have had dealings with this company myself. Their behaviour is heavy handed and downright nasty. Whatever you do, don't deal with them on the phone whatsoever. I learned the hard way about this after dealing with an extremely rude and abusive member of their staff on the phone who basically was making empty threats to me about sending bailiffs round, taking me to court etc, but they were upsetting all the same.

 

Insist they only deal with you in writing and put the phone down on them if they call you, as they may well do. They are very very persistent Nicole so you need to be strong. Have a look on the forums for other threads about Link and you'll get the general idea :mad:

 

Meantime I'm sure someone will advise you in full how to deal with them re correspondence., I just wanted to warn you about their phone calls so you are not caught unawares in the meantime. They tend to phone at VERY unsociable hours to catch you out, and they will use the personal first name approach as in "Hi there is that Nicole?" so please don't get caught out and end up in a discussion with them like I did, its simply not worth it.

 

Good luck

Spiritgirl ;)

Please note I am not legally qualified, I am offering advice based on my own personal experience in the hope that it may be of help to others in a similar situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and many thanks for your reply

I doubt they will have my phone number, I believe they get their information from the original creditor and MBNA did not have my number since I changed it a while ago

So pretty sure they won't be able to phone, but I am not english so will use my mother tongue to communicate in case they do get the number somehow.

:) Let's see how good their language skills are and whether they are better than mine :D

I try to find out as much as possible about the enemy before direct contact / enagagement takes place and every little bit of info will help me to see what they are like and how to stand up to them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link refused to put things in writing - said they didn`t have to. Then they refused to give details of the alleged debt & signed agreement. Eventually, I threatened to take them to court for harassment and have heard nothing since.

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, bring it on LINK

I am pretty sure they won't have a phone number so they will be forced to write , let's see what they come up with

I have heard or read in other threads that they are pretty quick off the amrkt, so will probably get the first letter next week

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just did a bit of a site search ref LINK and came about a very informative thread were it actually stated that DCA do not have to comply with a CCA request as the original agreement was terminated by the original lender

I know this is what LINK usually writes in their reply letter to CCA requests, but is this true or not

Here the relevant thread I am referring to

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/43409-link-financial-cca-request.html?highlight=Link

Any input ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nicole

My mother had an Barclays debt that was passed to Link. Nasty people. She has had several mini strokes and got confused and one day asked me to speak to them as she wasn't sure what they were going on about. Since then she now is bed and wheelchair bound and suffers serious dementia. They ring me frequently asking to speak to me. I say I'm not here and put the phone down. They ring and ring and ring over and over - well they did til I reported them to the police who contacted them on our behalf. They are awful on the phone - they are abusive and utterly vile individuals.

 

With regard the DCA request:

I am not legally trained. Reading the thread you mention I can appreciate the point of fact of a terminated agreement being a debt, whoever owns it, but as has been written on here on other threads; there are some DCA's who purchased resolved and fully paid debts, statute barred debts and non-existant debts.

 

I think one could reasonably argue that under these circumstances, if a DCA cannot prove you are the debtor, how can they legally enforce a debt? If I bought a load of application forms, or indeed I found some in the bins outside of the bank, and determined that maybe a third would be in debt, I could attempt, with the info on the application forms, to extract money from people.

 

I got a "Deed of Assignment" from Halifax, (HBOS), which looked very unofficial, stating the debt had been sold to 1st Credit Limited. Say it hadn't been? Should you pay them?

 

I think it may be considered a reasonable arguement in a Court that you had an agreement with MBNA and because you failed repayments for whatever reason, they terminated your account as per the terms and conditions of your account. You were told or not that a debt was sold on and you receive correspondance from a company who you did not owe money to, claiming ownership of your debt. You ask them to prove that, they cannot.

 

Also, please note, a terminated agreement does not negate the original agreement - if it did there would be no DCA's as there would be no debts to collect.

 

If this CCA template letter is not there for a purpose, why is it on this site? For what reason would anyone need an original copy of their credit agreement? Apart from when there wasn't one. How come people are quoting 12 working days + 2 days = DCA default upon the request + another 30 days = a criminal act of not complying with the terms of the Act? Why would a DCA commit a criminal act if it were not to provide the material requested?

 

If they believe it to be that they do not have to provide these documents - then they cannot take and keep your pound. You have given them permission to have a pound in return for a true copy of the credit agreement you signed, nothing else.

 

As I said in the beginning, I am not a legally trained person, but sometimes I think one has to look at these things laterally. What Zootscoot was saying I believe is that they can prove they own the debt in other ways. But I guess there are several schools of thought; if they choose not to find a way to prove they own the debt, then they could be deemed as negligent and deliberately misleading. Sending application forms is answering nothing.

 

I guess one could reasonably argue that if a DCA bought a debt from a creditor, they would have to disclose the date and amount paid to prove a purchased was transacted.

 

I am working on supposition here and not a defacto arguement, but even in a Court both sides generally have to show they have made reasonable attempts to resolve and rectify a situation before getting to a Court stage. I'm sure most Judges would probably feel it unreasonable not to provide you with what you requested, even if it is true that they do not have to.

 

Please note my use of the terms "reasonable" and "unreasonable" - two bits of legal jargon I do know and know have very strong implications at Court level.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...