Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBCrusher v HSBC - The Battle continues.. claim 4 ready to go!


HSBCrusher
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5885 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 604
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

OK.

I still have some more statements to find... but I have stuff going back a long long time.

some examples.

in 1999, excess OD was 27.50, £25 in 1997.

unpaid item in 1998 was £28.

look how they have gone up. :-(

I still have to track down the last few statements... but so far I have back to 1993, and its going to be quite a few thousand! :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh look, Mr Div has gone.

funny that.

inbox duly emptied.

Richard, I would put money on the fact that non of those outstanding claims are CAG members, we make sure our members get their money we are good

I will take a moment to think of someone who hasnt got all the money back from HSBC (other than those who settled early because they need the money of course)

 

 

still thinking

 

mmmmmmmmmmmm

 

 

 

 

 

nope, cant think of anybody!

 

long live CAG! :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

OK.... hang out the flags!

it is done!

thanks to a sprained ankle and some time at home I have finally got my 4th claim ready to roll!

£1002 in charges back to 1993 (ahhhh, my first charge, seems like yesterday) a charge for excess OD... just £15.

Ah, bless.

Anyhow, CI comes to £1591, interest charged on charges is just over £140. I think the spreaddy is showing this a bit low, so some final touches to do.

Mr Langdale.... here we come!

Link to post
Share on other sites

He is just rolling up his sleeves, nothing more, nothing less...

indeed.

this is not a standard claim. We are talking 6+, with no current charges in there at all. There is also contractual interest in there, however this only adds about £800 to the claim, so not excessive (as some of the claims with this type of interest are in my opinion).

This is not your bread and butter... lol.

I need to be very prepared...

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/11164-cank-halifax-10.html

 

not scared.... prepared.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Its just as well the banks dont share records of claimants else you would be lucky to open a swiss parachute account :lol: after alll these claims

 

 

CM

funnily enough, I have often thought about this.

 

anyway.... as for T&Cs... I do have something on overdrafts here.

I'll dig that out in a mo, im under about 3 feet of paper at the moment.... lol...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
hey crusher you seem to have been a 'little invaded'!!!! i guess that's because your'e a dalek at the end of the day lol

 

hows your claimsssssss goin?;)

very well thanks.

Im off on holiday in a little while, so I'm timing it that I will put in my N1 when I get back.

That might give Mr Langdale a chance to make a full offer for a change (if you are reading Colin... lol)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Quote 'I won a claim for my charges back and was paid in full.

Can I claim again as the bank HSBC says I cant for 6 months.

Is this true?'

 

well, I think you are spot on with your analysis CM :-D

 

 

 

yep, it's crap!

 

Even if they did introduce this policy, its not binding, and I would tell them where to stick the 6 months. And its not very sunny there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5885 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...