Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Asda destroyed wedding photos - What to claim??


natmc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6313 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I was hoping someone may be able to give me some advice or views and also help with any legal or important information we should quoted on our letter to Asda.

 

We choose to use disposable cameras for our wedding meal/evening do hoping that the guests would snap away to get us some great shots for this part of the day and also saving us £100's for a professional all day!!

We took the films to Asda to be developed, when we returned to pick them up we were told that they had been put through the devvelopment process incorrectly by an inexperienced staff member and that they had destroyed 8 out of 11 films. Obviously we were absolutely gutted and followed this up with a conversation with the manager whom accepted it was Asda's negligience and advised us to write a letter of complaint requesting compensation.

 

We wrote to them detailing how upsetting this was and requesting compensation as these are wedding photos that can not be replaced.

They have since reponded offering us £500, but the general view from friends and family is that we should not accept their first offer and should respond stating we are not happy with this offer, but I just dont where to begin. Any help would be much appreciated.

 

Thanks

Natalie

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless you want lawyers to get involved (expensive) - you may want to consider ASDA's offer. some cases have had labs offering up to £70 per roll, and some less, so an offer of around £70 is reasonable.

 

usually film is accepted by ASDA, TESCO's etc on the basis it has no commercial value, and their insurance is limited to negligence claims for holiday snaps etc., and the value extends to replacement film and processing. This is implied on the receipt they give you (mostly) when you take your films in, this would probably constitute and form your contract and acceptance.

 

It's not good when you have gone through such a happy day - and it's really not good to have your photos co**ed up.

 

a proper professional will (should) have indemnity to provide compensatory reshooting, i.e: building the day up again so you can at least have some memories - it has happened and photographers have had to claim for the (un) happy couple.

 

sorry the answer isn't too positive, I'm really not sure what you can do - perhaps get your entitlement to a free half hour of legal advice and see.

 

Good Luck

 

Steve

Halifax - paid out without getting to court - £250 WON - no intention of going, stated too costly!!

Halifax no 2 account - paid out without a fight - (by mistake, £1650 - should have been £1200 - had to pay some back)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a suggestion but you could use the £500 to pay for a few professional shots of some of the wedding party all dressed up again - Then you will have a few wonderful piccies of your day :)

links to my current claims ...

My claim - Yorkshire Bank Visa

chezt V RBS Mastercard

Chezt v RBS Joint Account

chezt v Abbey Credit Card

 

Settled ...

chezt V Duet Card/Creation Finance

chezt v's Studio Cards

chezt v's Littlewoods Catalogue

 

Next ...

Abbey Joint a/c & Single a/c

Barclaycard (Mine & Hubby's)

Anyone else I can think of ...! :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...