Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Penalty Train fares


boogie80
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6553 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I was just wondering how the law stands on penalty fares when you don't have a ticket on a train?

 

Friends of ours were forced to get on the train last night without a ticket as the ticket office was shut. The ride was a couple of stops into Birmingham and would normally have cost just under £2. Anyway, on reaching their destination without a ticket or a permit to travel they were given a £20 fine each!

 

Is this enforceable? Doesn't it come under the same remit as bank charges in that it doesn't cost the train company £20 to let each person travel without a ticket - it's purely a deterrent and maybe to cover losses from regular fare-skippers.

 

BTW, Our friends aren't a couple of punks who try to skip paying whenever they can, they spend hundreds of pounds a year on tickets but were just caught out due to lack of staffing / laziness to go and find the permit machine so they didn't miss the train.

 

Any thoughts??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Lueeze

Hmm I really dont know, but Im pretty sure that even though they couldn't buy a ticket, they are still at fault. They should have gone to the front of the train and asked the assistant before getting off....

 

I think you would find it hard to claim this back, checked google on information but couldn't find anything!

 

Sorry

 

Lou xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well I am in the same dilemma except my case seems a lot more serious and I just cannot understand what this countrys coming to!

 

I was stopped on the Docklands Light Railway two weeks ago and although I had a Oyster pass with £28 on it, it had not registered correctly on boarding. (Although this would of been taken at the end of my journey due to the barriers) The inspector said I was in the wrong and was fare dodging, something I have never been guilty of before and if they'd checked my records they could see that I have paid for this journey every day of the week for the last 2 years.

The outcome was that he had no choice but to charge me the £20 fine. Although I argued that I was not in the wrong I agreed to pay, but only had credit and debit cards on my person - not cash. He took my details and said it would be sent to me.

I was upset to find that the £20 fine was no longer payable, but a new fine of £76.25 (breakdown of admin/time and costs) and if this was not paid within ten days I would be taken to court and the fine would be in excess of this.

I just cannot understand the way I've been treated ... I've always been an honest member of the public but this leaves me not only embarassed but completely miffed with where I stand? Is there anymore I can do, or should I just swallow my pride and what I see as injustice and pay?

Link to post
Share on other sites

from what I understand the terms and conditions of using the railway states that you are travelling unlawfully/illegally (not sure which) if you board a train without a valid ticket... full stop. i would say that you would have to have exceptional circumstance and prove that there was no way to purchase a ticket before boarding in order to have a glimmer of hope in avoiding any charges. The railway is covered by special laws hence having its own police force. I know that rushing to catch the tain and not having time to purchase the ticket is not a defence. PS I'm no expert

Abbey £4340.59 *WON* Jan 07

 

Abbey II MCOL 31/03/07 £8800.00

 

Please note..I AM NOT AN EXPERT ANYTHING WHAT I POST IS PURELY MY OPINION AND MAY BE WRONG IT IS JUST BASED ON MY UNDERSTANDING OR EXPERIENCE

 

Read my latest claim its a fast track potentially

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/61406-noobrider-abbey-take-2-a.html?highlight=noobrider

 

read my first claim which includes attending a directions hearing in court

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/10576-noobrider-abbey.html?highlight=noobrider

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 10 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6553 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...