Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Anyone know anything about small claims in business?


sar011279
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6321 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, I've been trying to obtain payment owed to my husband who is a plumber from a company (one man band) that he did work for back in November. I've sent an invoice allowing 28 days but payment was not received. I followed this by another invoice sent recorded allowing 14 days for payment which he refused to collect from the post office and has been returned to us, so have now sent a final demand stating another 14 days or court, this was sent both recorded and 1st class, the recorded one has been returned again saying that he refused to sign for it.

Now I'm quite happy to file a claim if he doesn't pay up (don't think he will) and I would imagine, from the way he's dealt with the invoices plus the fact that he's one of these builders that goes bankrupt alot, that he will ignore the claim and we'll end up winning by default. If this happens and we need to enter judgement and send the baliffs in are we likely to see the money if the business has gone bankrupt again?

Hope this makes sense?!

PS I can't find any mention of company being Ltd Plc etc- not sure if good or bad:-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Issue a letter before action and then the claim form 7 days following.

 

If the firm is limited and if he decides to liquidate the firm then you are unlikely to recover anything. If he has a history of this, then you need to weigh up seriously whether in pursing the debt you will create yourselves further losses.

 

Type the name of the individual here:

Disqualified Directors Search

 

If the firm is unlimited then it is a different. You can then go after him and his personal assets. My experience is that you have a much better prospects with pursing individuals over Ltd companies.

 

Who was invoice addressed to, the individual or a limited firm? Did he write to you instructing you to undertake the works as a limited firm or individual. You need to resolve this point prior to commencing proceedings or in the alternative claim against both. If you decide to claim against both I can advise you specifically.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I can tell it's not a limited company, just a one man band. LBA has been returned as 'addresse gone away' and not refused as I first posted. Upon digging around a bit I have found that this guy declared personal bankruptcy about 3 months before the work was undertaken, he is not yet discharged. I decided to speak to the office dealing with his bankruptcy who said that they too were unable to find him and any information that I have they would be grateful if I would share it with them!

So, shall I just leave it and say bye to the money or should we file the claim, let it be won by default (I would imagine this will happen) and then let the baliffs find him - I expect they've more chance than I have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, does sound like he has done a runner to be honest. Is it a local address? I mean, without going to knock on his door, you could see if he lived there or not?

 

A claim is likely to not go very far a) if he's bankrupt, as if he had anything of any value, they would have taken it and b) there is no fixed abode for him and c) if you did get a default judgement, would he be able to pay it? If he's bankrupt, he's probably cash in hand and has no assets of his own.

 

It will catch up with him one day, as he'll leave a footprint and be gone. He won't be able to get credit and everything will have to be done on the sly, which is never good if you're in business. He's obviously not bothered at all!

 

However, maybe some bad media will help? Long shot, but naming and shaming seems to do well these days!

Lived through bankruptcy to tell the tale! Worked in various industries and studied law at university. All advice is given in good faith only :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...