Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

KAMRIA VS GMAC [ early settlement fees ]


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6323 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI TO ALL FIRST TIME ON,AND HAVE A PROBLEM---BIT OF BACKGROUND FIRST.Took out a mortgage with GMAC in october 05,it was a remortgage to reless funds for a business venture--cut a long story short the business i bought was based on as we have now found out on fraudulant figures [ which is going through the courts]also as the previous owners have also taken the client business back by undermean hands[also going through the courts as the contracts signed have been breached--all this has led to the business having to close and being £250,000 down on the awfull experiance.

Back to the point,gmac have applied to the courts for reposession this month as the mortgage arreas are now 5 months old.On the original contract there is a clause that states early redemption fee is payable within the first 2 years of the mortgage,which if repossesd before this october 07 is payable.the sum being £24,000 in penalties.Which seems very high as the situation has been out of my control.I suppose I could ask the courts to delay repossesion untill this october.[but cant see that happenning ]as then the total debt including all arreas would be less as the redemtion early release would have ended by then.-help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kamira & All,

 

I am currently considering taking action against GMAC also as I had a residential mortgage with them which also stated the similar terms on a ERC 5% wihtin the 1st 2 years should I redeem early.

 

Here's my story:

 

My circumstances changed dramatically and I left the property with my daughter for a number of personal reasons and am now on my own. I requested their permission to let the property to which they agreed but sadly I got a bad apple of a tenant who didnt pay etc, etc. I then found a deal with the local authority, guarenteed rental income 52 weeks of the year (slightly lower than market rental) for a contract of 3 years and i thought great they wanted the property and I wanted the deal. i spoke to GMAC regarding this and they said that they would only allow me to let to professionals even though i assured them i could provide them with a confirmation of the offer made by the local authority, I still dont understand although they say their reasoning is that renting to a local authority is too high risk and the rental would have been lower. i then explained that although the rental via local authoirty would have been slightly lower (approx 50GBP PCM) I didnt have to pay out a £160 PCM management fee to an estate agent therefor i would be considerably better off but they still declined. The local authority required proof from the mortgage lender they they permitted the 3 year plan, I had to remortgage with another company who permitted such lets. In order to do this I am now subject to just under 5k in erc and charges. I would have stayed with them but could not take the risk of having another bad apple of a tenant which would have resulted in me missing payments etc, or possible not being able to find a tenant.

 

I am really not sure if I have any recourse but I feel I have been unfairly penalised due to a change in my circumstance leaving me 2 choices - get fined by GMAC in order to leave or to take a risk and possibly end up having the property reposessed due to no guarentee of rental income via the professional route eventually ending up worse off.

 

Can anyone advise if I have a leg to stand on?

 

Cheers,

 

K.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First get everything in writeing if you can, ask them if they agree to you renting it out, and if not why not have you got there agreement in writing for the first time . When you have that ask them again if you can do a three year deal if they say no get it in writing and ask them to waive the erc if the wont tell them if they try to repossess you will show all the correspondence to the judge as you beleive they are being unreasonable see what that does but dont let them know what you are going to do just take it step buy step and if you have a telephone call follow it up with a letter outlining what was agreed

Bona

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bona,

 

Thanks for your message.

 

The problem is i had a deadline with the local authority to accept the deal and i really need the peace of mind the contract had to be active by the 01/03/07, so i have already proceeded and completed on the remortgage with another company on Wed. Does it mean I dont really have a case now plus silly I know but everything was done by phone although i could still write to them asking them to explain their reasoning...? What do you think? Looking back i can see just how careless I have been mainly due to personal probs but hey maybe things are on the up :-)

 

K.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...