Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MrIncredible v Halifax ***settled***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6258 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

welcome to the forum MrIncredible!:cool:

You could estimate (as a reasonable average)the charges if the statements are missing, or contact the bank and request them - sometimes thay can give a transaction listing for specific dates. If they can't supply them, go with your average (but not over the top...).If you send in your prelim, you're showing you are serious about your claim, and you may want to consider putting the fact that although you requested the statements, they didn't appear, and being reasonable you are estimating the missing bits. They will either ignor this and accept it, or get the info to you pronto.

 

Anyway, Good Luck. Regardless of the amount, the principal is the same, it's your money, go get it!:grin:

  • Haha 1

Halifax - paid out without getting to court - £250 WON - no intention of going, stated too costly!!

Halifax no 2 account - paid out without a fight - (by mistake, £1650 - should have been £1200 - had to pay some back)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very much so! Standard as standard lamp in a standard lamp shop, down a standard street! Verrry Halifax;)

 

They have this mentality of expecting all and sundry to wait for them (usually 4 weeks).

 

You have a time scale - 14 days - (if you have and know your charges prior to your S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)) - stick to it!!

 

I think personally they are overrun with us lot persuing them, and can't keep up. If you have done a prelim letter outlining what you want, then I suggest you intervene after 14 days, and go for a letter before action, give them another 14 days and perhaps telephone them if no reply. This is because they will no doubt try and ignore you, hoping you will go away, and not go to court or they will try to fob you off! When you call them you may want to ask them if they intend to settle prior to you going to court? - this of course would save them paying interest and court costs.(don't want to dip into anybodies profits do we??):D

Halifax - paid out without getting to court - £250 WON - no intention of going, stated too costly!!

Halifax no 2 account - paid out without a fight - (by mistake, £1650 - should have been £1200 - had to pay some back)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

not really profess to be an expert but (in no particular order)-

 

from April the Financial Ombudsnan and OFT will make suggestions to the financial sector as to how much they could charge....but it is not law!

 

You could accept the payment as a part settlement, and explain you are pursuing for the rest of your claim - I'm impressed by their letter, I'm claiming less and haven't had an offer, yet!! (the LBA is sent so give it a couple of days, then phone them)

 

Explain that you want to avoid loading the claim with court costs, and would want to settle amicably, but the whole amount plus SAR costs please. (there is a template for part settlement in the library) - by not accepting the amount offered will prejudice any future litigation you make.

 

So, accept in part payment using the template suggestion, give it a couple of days, and phone them (Saturday / Monday)

 

Steve

Halifax - paid out without getting to court - £250 WON - no intention of going, stated too costly!!

Halifax no 2 account - paid out without a fight - (by mistake, £1650 - should have been £1200 - had to pay some back)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A moral victory - taken to where you want it - it's not for us to prejudge what you do.

 

Well done - hope your family situation gets a little better

 

good luck to the both of you

 

steve

Halifax - paid out without getting to court - £250 WON - no intention of going, stated too costly!!

Halifax no 2 account - paid out without a fight - (by mistake, £1650 - should have been £1200 - had to pay some back)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...