Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Three-pronged attack!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6318 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Greetings, what a great site this is, for too long the consumers have been pushed around and pushed to the brink of bankruptcy by greedy companies!

 

Having acquired a significant credit card bill recently (not frivolous spending btw - mostly for an engagement ring - wish me luck!) i've finally had a chance to spend some time checking my online statements been looking in ways to recoup some losses i've suffered in the past. My cases (I haven't taken any action so far, thats why I'm here) are as follows:

 

1 - £610.00 in direct debit and overdraft excess charges from Lloyds TSB dating from August 2003 to the present. I've got printouts from their online banking site showing these charges and I've just copied the template letter from I'm fairly confident about getting most of this back but I understand that some hard work will be involved.

 

2 - £103.87 in overpaid insurance. Basically I signed a contract with O2 in November 2003 for a mobile phone with £7.99 per month insurance. That contract ended in November 2004 but the insurance payments continued to be deducted from my account until I found out and cancelled the direct debit from the bank in December 2005. Unfortunately I have no documentation to support this. I checked with bank a few months ago and they gave me a contact number for the charges, all I have is that and their reference number showing on my statements. Not too confident about getting this back.

 

3 - approx. £360 from Orange and/or the Carphone Warehouse. I signed up for one of these 'cheque-back schemes' and was told I would only pay £4.99 per month when in fact it was usually between £30 and £35 per month. The terms were that you had to return the third, sixth and twelth bills (I think). Unfortunately, shortly after taking out this contract I moved house and again the documentation is nowhere to be found. I went to the Carphone Warehouse shop near me for confirmation of the terms but they were no help, saying it was nothing to do with them. I have however saved most of my bills from Orange, that particular contract ended in October 2006. Not confident at all about getting this money back but would appreciate any guidance.

 

I'm going to be posting these queries individually on the various sub-forums but for now I would greatly value any initial opinions or advice about how to claim some of this back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the site.

Certainly does look like you have your work cut out but it is good to see that you have done some homework already.

I should just add that Consumer action group have template letters which have been tried and tested 1000s of times with great success.

I therefore do not feel the need to have links to other temps from other sources as it may confuse members of CAG.

For this reason I would ask that you dont post links on the forum from external sources.:)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...