Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Unused Sole Trader Barclays Account Accrued Fees and Interest


Recommended Posts

Hi

I'm after some advice.

I had two business accounts with Barclays, one a sole trader and a Limited Company account.

I had some overdrafts active on both in 2020.

As the first lockdown progressed, my business was no longer viable,  I made moves to close my business and accounts. I cleared the overdrafts and I am sure I requested to have both accounts closed. 

I checked my personal spam folder a couple of weeks ago and saw that there was an email from Barclays saying I was possibly overpaying for my overdraft facility.

Calling them up I discovered that my Sole Trader account had not been closed and had been accruing bank charges and interest of which the balance was £616.79.

They have just written to me to confirm upon investigation:

  • I called in December 2020 and requested for both limited and sole trader accounts to be closed. I was advised that accounts need to be brought to nil before this is completed
  • After gathering the funds to cover the overdraft, I called again in June 2021 and cleared the balance. They have said that during the call I did not request for the Sole Trader account to be closed, only the Limited (this may be true but I am unsure).
  • They have continued to email statements to me (these again were in spam folder).
  • As such it will continue to accrue fees and interest until cleared. The only charges on this account in this time have been fees and interest - I have not made any transactions myself. 

I'd be grateful if anyone could advise on how to approach this with Barclays.

Many thanks. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them an SAR.

get proof they were told from their comms log.

then pay nothing.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I received a letter from them last month saying thank you for request for copies of phone conversations.

To assist their search, please provide as many details on specific calls I am interested in as possible

"Please note we are less likely to be able to locate calls more than 12 months old and all calls are provided on USB format".

They sent a link to provide more information.

The SAR came last week.

I've looked through multiple times and can't see the call referenced in the March letter - the 2021 call to cancel the accounts. 

Should I input the details for the 2021 call specifically on that link or keep everything to letters?

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not looking very hopeful then...

there is usually an account comms or manual intervention notes where call  operators have typed notes.... not in the SAR?

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had another look through but I can't locate anything like that.

They did, in a previous letter, reference my call in June 2021 but I cannot see this referenced in what they have sent

. Worth requesting this specifically do you think? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, engineering dispute said:

They did, in a previous letter, reference my call in June 2021

scan it up to pDF

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as everything on the ac is their unlawful penalty fees and the interest they have accrued , i would now simply ignore them.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as said the FOS cannot send you info they received from whom you are complaining about if they refused the FOS permission to do so.

they are sort of pointing to why did YOU not gather all the info first, before coming to us.

your first action should have been an SAR to the bank.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...