Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Judgment made against my company but I never received notification until 12 days after payment due.


terracotta4
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 475 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I run a small online Garden goods company mainly online -

 

this year I sent 2 large ornaments to a customer who had bought them online.

 

Our Terms and Conditions state that goods must be inspected before signing and we also pay an insurance premium to the pallet delivery company to cover breakages.

 

The delivery was made the goods were photographed on buyers drive and they were signed for by the customer in good order - 25 days later I received a call from customer to say that they were damaged when unwrapped the previous day.

 

I checked all details with courier and Paypal our card processing company and we all agreed there was nothing we could do. She then started contradicting her own story regarding how the ornaments arrived - I sent images of the planters packed and delivered.

 

I then received a claim from the County Court..

I defended the claim in writing with evidence from the carrier and the actual driver - in the images she sent it was clear that the damaged large ornament had been hit with a car possibly as the impact point was clear to see. 

 

All documents were submitted to the court - she sent me copies of everything she was presenting and I heard no more.

 

I have never had to deal with anything like this before and didn't know the time frames involved.

 

In the last 4 weeks I have tried to contact the County Court in question but they never answer a call. 

 

On Saturday (Feb 25th) I went to my shop and found a letter from the court stating that judgement had been made against us and that I had to pay this opportunist a sum by the 14th February.

 

I have tried to call the court all day today but still no answer.

 

Question is

what can we do about this and I also want the damaged ornament returned as it can be repaired.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should have informed the court and use your home address? are you a ltd co.  or a sole trader and are the addresses the same ?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Limited Company and everything addressed to my shop which is below a flat which is where a lot of our mail gets sent.

 

.I didn't give the court my home address as their initial contact was by email and as this has never happened to us in 35 years

 

we assumed all further communication would be by this route... 

 

I'm also at a loss as to why they do not answer any phone calls so that the issue can be tracked..

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean the county court not northants bulk?

 

you should never just use email ....always..always back everything up by royal mail letter.

 

so you had the notice of allocation, the N157?, from the claimants selected court and that came by email,? and you exchanged witness statements by email with the claimant too? never once sent anything by surface mail?

 

were you not notified of any hearing date?

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

First notification was by email - this was followed by hard copy

- then submitted all supporting evidence by mail

- this was acknowledged

- then more evidence requested which was submitted by recorded mail again

- later received Claimants guff by mail ..

 

then waited to hear what would happen

- heard nothing until Judgement received on Saturday 25th

- apparently hearing was on January 31st

- but I received no notice ..

 

I was calling to find out what was happening but calls never picked up

- it was Swindon County Court..

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, terracotta4 said:

First notification was by email - this was followed by hard copy

of what and from who?

 

9 minutes ago, terracotta4 said:

- then submitted all supporting evidence by mail

you mean you filed your defence on MCOL after doing the acknowledgement of service their earlier too.? (you can't file separate evidence with a defence)

you then have an N180 Directions Questionnaire from northants bulk. what address was that sent too for you?

once a court is allocated you get an N157 and directions to exchangewitness statements by a date poss 14 days before the hearing?

 

unless ofcourse the claimant is using the new MCOL system whereby everything is done online?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...