Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Possible criminal damage by builders ?


Recommended Posts

Lots going on so I'm going to split my problems into single questions over a week or so.
First is ; There was a mystery fire that caused damage to my sheds and stables on a property I jointly own with my ex.
My ex employed a contractor to deal with the clean up and rebuild.
He claimed the environment agency told him to dig up a large part of the tarmac driveway and later claimed the EA had told him to cut down about 40 large trees which he did.  My ex confirmed this was true and later her solicitor confirmed this was the case but provided no proof. 
 
The Environment Agency said they had not told anyone to do anything and wouldn't have got involved and there was no contact with anyone at the address or the names I gave.
 
He has been paid for the work.
 
In my opinion he has committed criminal damage as he;
dug the driveway up under false pretences and has not relayed the tarmac.
Cut down and destroyed 40 trees under false pretences.
 
Is this the case? What are my options? I'd really like to get the police involved.
 
I had a solicitor who wrote to my ex's solicitor for the proof of what the environment agency order , nothing as been supplied. 
My solicitor also asked for the insurance proposal and claim but nothing supplied. 
 
In fact I have now suspended my solicitor as there was no reply to the last 3 letters costing me a lot of money. 
--------------------------
 
I'm also looking for a direct access barrister  if anyone can help. 
 
 
Edit Post
 
 

WON lloyds walked away after second hearing £10,000 2014

 

WON Mbna after 3rd hearing £5,000, 2014

 

WON Barclaycard 1st hearing £2015, 4,500

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

In case this is relevant, were any of the trees subject to protection orders?

 

Direct access barristers seem to be accessible through this link but are you sure it's a barrister and not a solicitor you need?

 

WWW.BARCOUNCIL.ORG.UK

Search for a barrister to instruct directly on the publicly accessible online hub

 

HB

 

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, no preservation orders they were just 40 year old mixed trees. 

 

They couldnt do anything to the land or property without my approval as  I'm joint owner. 

 

He used  used the Environment Agency ' telling him as away to gain more work. 

I obviously saw through this nonsense and the Environment Agency are happy to make a statement to the court . 

WON lloyds walked away after second hearing £10,000 2014

 

WON Mbna after 3rd hearing £5,000, 2014

 

WON Barclaycard 1st hearing £2015, 4,500

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes take it to court, I can't get anywhere at all no reply from her solicitor etc. 

 

thnx

 

 

WON lloyds walked away after second hearing £10,000 2014

 

WON Mbna after 3rd hearing £5,000, 2014

 

WON Barclaycard 1st hearing £2015, 4,500

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...