Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PCN for stopping on zigzag school markings


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 496 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi 

here for a bit of advice...

 

I dropped my wife off at the school one lunchtime stopping for a few seconds on the zigzag lines outside. I thought that the zigzags were only operational in the morning and afternoon for drop-off and pickup but got a PCN from Waltham Forest showing my car stopping and a sign with the times (8am-4pm).

 

There were no signs on the road as I approached the school, nor any directly outside the school and as I turned right into another road to do a u-turn I didn't pass the sign that is shown on the PCN.

 

I have appealed the PCN as there were no signs displaying the times when the markings were operational other than the one further up the road which I didn't pass (there were also no signs saying that CCTV is being used but I believe that this is ok for school markings).

 

Just wondering what my chances of winning the appeal would be and also if I should fight it further should Waltham Forest turn down my appeal.

 

Thanks for reading and any advice welcomed! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply @dx100uk. Most school zigzags that I have seen all have a sign with the operational times. The ones outside the school that I received a PCN for are 8am-4pm so they're not 24 hours.

 

From what I've read white zigzags are 24 hour, yellow ones need to have a accompanying sign indicating the operating hours to be enforceable:

https://www.drivingtesttips.biz/yellow-zig-zag-lines.html?amp

 

My issue is that there should be sufficient signage to show the operating hours so that cars approaching from any direction are aware of the operational times.

 

I think that this is a just reason for appealing the fine but wanted to get the opinion of others with more experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Manxman in exile no it wasn't a police ticket - it was a council one using cctv. It may well be that the site I quoted above is talking rubbish(!) but I've found a few that seem to say the same thing:

 

WWW.THESUN.CO.UK

WE all want to avoid the frustration and costly expense of a parking ticket - but the problem is, sometimes it’s hard to know what the rules are whe

 

WWW.MANCHESTEREVENINGNEWS.CO.UK

This is what the law says about parking near a school entrance and on yellow lines

 

WWW.ETA.CO.UK

What can be done to tackle parking outside schools that is inconsiderate and and downright dangerous?

 

but I have no idea if they are correct or not.

 

The point I'm trying to raise with the council is that the particular zigzag line that I stopped on was not 24 hours and had operating times (8am-4pm), however there is insufficient signage to advise drivers of the fact - there's a single sign further up a dead-end road that most people including me would not see until a PCN arrives with a photo of it on there. 

 

To be honest I can pay the fine, but I see it as another case of a local authority trying to trick drivers into supplementing their coffers. If this was really about protecting school children crossing then they would have signs further down the road (before the zigzag lines) to advise drivers not to stop.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...