Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thousands more passengers could face delays or cancellations after an arson attack on France's train network on Friday.View the full article
    • you never use or give an email  2nd class stamp with free proof of posting from any po counter dx
    • Much appreciated for the ammendment. The snottier the better right!   What I am assuming is that this response is to be posted to Gladstones? However, I am seeing some users sending this as an email instead, which is a little confusing.  If we're happy with this response, what would you suggest is the best way to send it over to them (post/email), and is there anything additional I could include (if necessary)?  Thanks again! 
    • Hi I've read through other threads to better inform me of the process from here onwards. When I put in the MoneyClaim it gave me a claim number and it currently says to wait for the defendant to respond, they have until 7 August.   It seems their most likely action is to extend that a further 14 days to about 21 August - this hasn't happened yet, of course, as it is only 27 July but I'm anticipating that may be the case. when the expected defence action is taken by EVRi I will need to submit DQ with these responses A1 - no mediation B - my contact details C1 - yes to the small claims track D1 - No.  If No please state why.  I believe the defence will provide some rebuttal to the particulars of claim and so I need to include details as to why the claim requires a hearing.  Is there some certain templated text I can include here or will it vary depending on what the defendant comes back with? I see on the form it mentions the following: Relevant reasons include that there are factual disputes which will need the judge to hear from witnesses directly or the issues are so complex they need to be argued orally.  Hoping to reach out to see what may be the most effective statements for D1 reasoning. E1-5 are pretty straightforward. I want to get ahead of things and be ready to take the next step so I appreciate what advice you may have about the DQ.   Thanks!  
    • Rachel Reeves is set to reveal a public finances shortfall of billions on pounds after a snap audit.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

eBay buyer issues


SJM2805
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 572 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Just after some advice.

 

I sold an item on eBay in November and, after a couple of weeks or so, the item still hadn’t arrived, the buyer opened a request with eBay. The buyer ended up receiving a refund and the case was closed. However, shortly after, the item was delivered to the buyer.  I also have proof from the tracking details that the buyer has received and signed for the item.

 

I contacted eBay about this and they told me to contact the buyer and ask them to either send the item back or to send me a payment for what the item originally sold for. The buyer has not responded to my email and eBay have said that, once a case is closed, there is nothing that they themselves can do for me to receive my money back. 

 

Is there any legal action I can take regarding this matter as I do have proof that the buyer was refunded and later did receive the item? 

 

Kind regards 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes there is a legal action. You can sue them for the money which they owe you.

From what you say I gather that you know the name and address of the purchaser.

Can you tell us what the item was and how much money has been reimbursed to them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay.

No point in hanging around. Read up on this forum about the steps involved taking a small claim in the County Court.

Draft letter of claim and post it here.
Once we have checked it and it seems okay then you should send it off and click off the claim 15 days later as promised in your letter of claim.

Once you have sent the letter of claim then register with the County Court MoneyClaim website and begin your claim there. Post up a draft of any particulars of claim here before you issue the claim.

If you send the letter of claim then be absolutely certain that you aren't bluffing and that you will click the claim of as promised in your letter of claim.

If you aren't certain then don't do it – but then probably better give up

You can also inform them in your letter of claim that once you receive your judgement, that their full name and address and also their eBay ID will be posted up on this forum and elsewhere on the Internet together with a copy of the judgement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, can you advise if this Letter of Claim is acceptable to send thanks: 
 

Quote

 

Letter of Claim 

 

Dear ********* *****

 

I am writing to you in regards to an item you purchased from me via eBay on 25/11/2022 for the sum of £299 which was an Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max mobile phone [item number 314220961744]. 

 

You opened a request with eBay 08/12/2022 as the item had still not been delivered at that point and on 12/12/2022 you were issued a full refund by eBay and the case was closed. 

 

On the 21/12/2022 the item was delivered to your address and I have proof of this from the tracking details that I entered on to the Royal Website which shows that the item has been delivered and signed for. 

 

I contacted eBay regarding this matter and they told me that I should contact you and ask you to either return the item to me, or, if you wanted to keep the item, to send me a payment for the sum of £299 - the amount that the phone was originally sold to you for and the amount that was billed to my account when you were refunded by eBay. 

 

I then contacted you and asked you to send the item back or to send a payment to me for the amount of £299 but you did not respond to my email and have refused to resolve this situation.

 

This Letter of Claim is to inform you that you have 14 days to either return the item to the address listed above, or, if you wanted to keep the item, you will need to send a payment of £299 to my PayPal account which is:

 

**********************

 

If this situation is not resolved within the 14 days then I will be escalating the matter to the County Court. Once the matter is escalated to the County Court, you will not only be liable to pay for the cost of the phone, but also any court fees which may be incurred plus interest charges. I have all your details to hand and the evidence that the phone was delivered to you which will be passed on to the County Court. 

 

Yours sincerely,

 

**** ******** 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fine. Send it.

Just to warn you that if this person is a vindictive person, you may not get the phone back in the condition in which it was sent. I hope you have evidence of its condition because if not you might then have a very complicated problem on your hands

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing you could do would be to consult the land registry web search website.

 

For £3, you can check the address and see whether the person happens to be the owner of the property .

If they are, then that gives you an additional leverage

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, keep us updated step by step. We can help you work this out .

Think that a land registry check for 3 quid would be a sensible set and would represent good value, especially if you found that they were the owners of the property

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...