Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

EVRi - lost Parcel (Scotland) - SPC Claim Issued **SETTLED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 881 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I don't think this is particularly different from many of the sorry stories on this site, but will share in case it is of help/interest.

 

I was sending a parcel (ebay sale - a boardgame worth £20) from Scotland to England.  After it not moving for over 3 weeks, raised a support ticket with Hermes.  The next day they said it was lost and pointed me at their claims form.

 

Filled in the claim form (on 28th Sep) and on 27th Oct Hermes updated asking for proof of value etc.  However, they didn't send a notification to me, so I didn't discover this until I logged in on 27/10  to chase them.  

 

Provided the required info, but they now state that as I didn't reply within 14 days, I've broken their T&Cs.

 

As an aside, I do wonder if not sending you a notification email is a deliberate business practice so that they can then invoke their "14 days" rule to try to avoid liability.

 

I replied stating that their 14 day rule was irrelevant and gave them 14 days before I started the small claims (as it's in Scotland, The Simple Procedure).  No reply (in fact, they marked the ticket as resolved - looks like this was done by an automated process).

 

So, I just submitted the SImple Procedure process online.  It was very straightforward and cost £19.  The only tricky bit was there's a statement around interest, but Citizens Advice suggested you could say you want the sheriff to "apply interest at the judicial rate".

 

Thanks for all the advice and stories on this forum - it helped me understand they really are just a bunch of unethical chancers trying to scare you off.

 

I'll provide updates once things have slowly moved forward.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Hermes - lost Parcel (Scotland) - SPC Claim Issued

I've never been through the Simple Procedure, so I don't know if mediation is a part of it - the help on the website implied you should try mediation *before* you start the Simple Procedure.

 

The process must have kicked-off as Hermes "legal department" just emailed me with an offer of £26.69 in compensation (the usual "gesture of good will" tosh).  However, there's no mention of my £19 fee for starting the Simple Procedure, so I assume they're hoping I won't realise that isn't included.

 

I also believe the Sherriff's Court would add interest, at about 8%, but truthfully, that's going to be about 40p (though I'm not sure what period it would be applied to).

 

I'm guessing my next step is to get back in touch and say their offer also needs to cover the £19 cost of initiating the Simple Procedure (and maybe also the addition of the interest), so it matches the outcome which the sheriff's court would reach.

 

Edited by Inconvenient
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So, it went like this:

 

I rejected Hermes offer of £26.69 saying:

  • Arguments based on dates in the Hermes contract were unenforceable under UK consumer law
  • I wanted the full value of my claim as per the simple procedure - £26.69 for the game and postage; £19 to cover the costs of simple procedure; interest calculated at the Sherrif Court standard rate
  • Given this was down to the dishonesty and obstructive behaviour from Hermes, I wasn't interested in compromising
  • I wanted confirmation of the payment date, as I expected interest to be paid every day up to that date.

Got a very swift response offering me all that and confirming a payment date a few days later - Interest calculated at 8% per annum (which is what I believe the court standard rate is).

 

I accepted and payment has gone through.

 

So, once again, Hermes will fold if you stick to your guns.  The fact that they try to deter you with their nonsense and make you take them to court is just awful.  Never going to use them again.

 

Interestingly, Hermes say their payment is a "gesture of goodwill" and also ask that I "inform the court that this matter has settled".

 

Looking at the Simple Procedure Advice and the Civilonline system, I can find form 7a, but this seems to be applicable when the respondent (i.e. Hermes) admits the claim.  I'm not sure they have "admitted" anything, so I'm not certain if or how I tell the court I've got my money.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both - I am amused with the idea of getting back to Hermes.... maybe.

 

They did seem to cave in very quickly - must be simpler in Scotland

 

And I will ring the sherrif's court up - did try earlier, but nobody was around/they were busy on other calls.

 

Thanks for all the advice on this group - it really helped me with the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to EVRi - lost Parcel (Scotland) - SPC Claim Issued **SETTLED**
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...