Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mytchett First Cars/Blue Motor Finance - faults on bought car **RESOLVED BY Blue Motor Finance**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 906 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/search/?q="Noel Quail"&updated_after=any&sortby=relevancy

I'm afraid that you have been suckered more than you think.

Most people who find themselves with these kinds of problems have paid by cash or paid by bank transfer.

You haven't made that mistake.

You have used a finance agreement.

What you don't seem to have realised is that as well as helping you to buy the car, under the Consumer rights act the finance company bears equal responsibilities with the dealer and if the dealer will not co-operate then the finance company will be bound to pay all of the cost of repairs or even to refund you the cost of the vehicle if you decide to reject it.

We have heard a lot about Noel Quail in the past.

He is not doing you any favours by negotiating £500 payments to you. He is actually avoiding all of his proper consumer obligations.

We can certainly help you get your money back for the car but we may have more difficulty getting you back the money you spent on repairs because strictly speaking you shouldn't have spent that money by relying on the so-called warranty.

You should realise that these used car warranties are really just bonbons which are offered to you by the dealer to divert you from your true rights under the Consumer rights act.

That seems to have worked quite well in your case.

Please can you give us a full timeline of events. When did you buy the vehicle. How much did it cost you. How much mileage was there.

When did it first started to develop faults faults.

Can you tell us something about the exchanges between yourself and the dealer so we can understand what you have said to the dealer and how the dealer has replied.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

also what exchanges have you had with the finance company?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

Did you contact the dealer in writing? Did he respond to you in writing? Have you had any written exchanges  between you?

What written exchanges have you had with the finance company ?

 please can you post up any of these exchanges in pdf format. Single file multi-page.

Thank you

Also I would be interested to know whether you are certain that the Goodwill payment from Noel came from the finance company or is it possible that he simply paid this to you and told you that it came from the finance company to make you think that it was paid in some kind of authoritative way.

Was the finance which was provided simply a loan agreement or did you purchase the vehicle on hire purchase?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I will have a look at them and get back to you later.

 

Meanwhile have there been any exchanges with the finance  company?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When did they  say that they would refer your complaint and did they put this in writing? 

It would be helpful if you would give a complete detailed answer so that we don't have to keep on asking questions.

 

Thank you

 

 

Also, you say that the agreement was a hire purchase agreement. This means that the car belongs to them and you are simply renting it from them until the final payment when it becomes yours.

 

This means that you have been spending a lot of money repairing someone else's car

 

Bravo

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are still waiting to know about any exchanges you have had with the finance company. It would be helpful if you could engage with this read a little more closely.

 

So far as I can gather,  this has been going on on since at least May.

 

It is absolutely clear that you need to be involving the finance company and we will help you but we need to know what has happened so far.

 

Certainly as you eventually seem to have   realised  you are being ripped off to the extent that not only have you been sold a dodgy motor car, but also no you have fallen victim to a useless warranty so that you are now starting to pay for repairs to the dodgy motor car yourself.

 

There is absolutely no need for a warranty and not only that you have topped up a lot of the repair bill with your own money which was also completely unnecessary.

 Noel Quail must be laughing and laughing but I suppose that you are not the only victim.

 

 You have perfectly adequate rights under the Consumer Rights Act and not only that you have a finance agreement in place which is also is a hire purchase agreement and that means that not only  are the finance company responsible for the car because effectively they sold it to you by lending the money but also because the car is still theirs.

 

Despite that you seem to have been under the impression that you had to pay for everything yourself if the so-called warranty was not applicable.

 

 I think it's about time we brought this to  a halt and I think it's about time you asserted yourself and we try at least to get your money back for your vehicle and maybe some of the money you have spent repairing  is it it.

 

 It will be much more difficult to get the money you have laid out for repairs because both Paul Quail and the finance company will say that you went ahead with these repairs and you didn't invoke any rights and certainly the finance company will say that you didn't inform them or consult with them before you went ahead.

 

I know that you have given a certain description of the problems in your opening post but this is a rather narrative description.

 

What I'd like you to do please is to give us a bullet pointed list of the faults which have occurred and which you have addressed and then a separate bullet pointed list of the ports which still exist.

 

where is the car now?

are you driving it?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there any movement on this?

We would really like to push this forward because this guy needs to be sorted out and if we make a claim to the finance company you will at least get all of your purchase price back.

 

After that we can turn our attention to the other expenses you have lost

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to hear that the finance company seems to be taking an interest. However don't imagine that that's the end of the story am afraid.

First of all they are likely to be reluctant to do anything. They may start imposing other requirements such as other evidence. And at the end of the day they may well say that they are only responsible for the refund of the purchase price and not the other money you have spent.

I hope I'm wrong but am afraid that I'm very suspicious of these finance companies, and this one in particular.

I think you will need to keep on their case. Don't let anything go too long. If you haven't heard anything by this time next week then they need chasing up and then regularly every couple of days.

Try not to do anything on the telephone but if you do read our customer services guide and of course keep us updated. Anything which is done on the telephone should be confirmed in writing so that you have got a solid paper trail which records everything that has been said.

I think you should have a very short fuse on this one. You've been mucked around quite long enough and frankly if the finance company hasn't agreed to a refund in the next 14 days then I think that we should consider beginning some kind of action.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think four weeks and simply a very vague and open-ended promises far too long.

I think you need to be careful not to lose control of this and I would suggest that you immediately send them a letter saying that this is not acceptable and that there is nothing to investigate or negotiate. It is a simple matter of your consumer rights and that Noel Quail is simply trying to avoid his obligations.

Also I think you should point out that you know that this man has form for this kind of thing and that they, the finance company fully aware of this because you have seen them discussed on the Internet and you understand very well how difficult it has been for others to bring pressure on this finance company.

For the moment I suggest that you don't refer to this forum – leave them guessing.

Tell them that because of this unacceptable delay and because of their familiarity with the difficulties caused by this dealer you are now turning this into a formal complaint and that they have eight weeks to give your final response or it must go to the ombudsman.

Tell them then it goes to the ombudsman you will produce additional evidence relating to Noel Quail and also the pattern of reluctance demonstrated by this finance company in complying with their obligations under section 75 of the consumer credit act.

I suggest that you get this letter off to them tomorrow. They have to realise that you are in control and not them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should have started the ombudsman complaint anyway. It wouldn't cost you anything and it would save time if they don't pull their finger out.

I would suggest that you write to them immediately and tell them that on reflection you are starting a formal complaint and you want it sent the ombudsman. Then they know that a clock is ticking

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well done and thanks for the update.

Now that you have "trained" Blue Motor Finance if anything else goes wrong in the future, presumably they can be forced to act more quickly.

Did you incur any ancillary losses such as car hire or extra fares or anything? Because these would be recoverable against the finance company as they took so long to deal with it.
They should have dealt with immediately and then sorted the problem with Noel Quail afterwards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...