Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Erudio / CapQuest & Old Style Student Loan


The G 99

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

This is my first post on your awesome site.

I have been reading posts for two solid days, and like so many others am just after some clarity on what to do next.

 

Regarding my Old Style Student Loans (1993,94 & 95)

Between 1996 and 2012 either successfully deferred or correct payments made. 

The last payment I made was in 2012.

 

Deferment applied for in late 2012.

All forms, statements, evidence sent to Student Loans Company. Sadly I have no proof of this.

Thought nothing more of it. Did not get a refusal of deferment so assumed all ok. 

 

In 2015 I get a NOTICE OF SUMS IN ARREARS from Erudio. 

Having spoken with Erudio they told me that my Loans were Terminated in December 2014, then passed to Capquest. 

Erudio said that without any proof of me sending in my application to the Student Loans Company to defer, there was nothing they could do.

 

Erudio still send annual statements. 

Capquest send emails and texts advising me to use their portal which does not work.

They have sent two settlement offers, the best one being a 70% reduction in 2017. 

The Loan total amount is £1,156.52.

 

I have had no paperwork from Capquest since 2019. 

Erudio have my correct address so there is no pile of unopened letters at a previous address.

 

Apologies for not being able to find the answers on the many posts you have on this subject.

 

I have options but which ones would you now advise and in which order should I do them? 

 

A lawyer friend said I may have a case for an UNFAIR RELATIONSHIP with Erudio as the loan should have been marked as deferred back in 2014 when they took it on?

 

I have read your previous advice about asking for a Subject Access Report - who from in my case?

Erudio - or can you ask for one from Student Loans Company? Or both?

 

No payments have been made since 2012 as stated, and I have not written to Capquest 'admitting' liability for the debt. 

 

Both the 25 year loan limit and me reaching 50 years old have now happened

- but as I have read this does not apply to my loan in the state it is now.

 

Should I send the STATUTE BARRED template letter first to Capquest?

Or first try to prove the loan was deferred when Erudio took it on? 

 

Again I am unclear if its even possible to backdate deferment, or even worth telling Erudio I will take this matter further, etc.

 

I know it was spoken about in other posts but I could not find the final answer.

At no point has any paperwork from Erudio or Capquest mentioned 'Further Action'.

 

With regards to the Statute Barring, am I right in saying the DEFAULT date is the date of the Erudio Loan Termination which as mentioned is Dec 2014?

 

I hope I have included all the relevant details here for you to be able to comment.

 

Many many thanks in advance.

The G 99

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

erudio, capquest, arrows, drydens...all the same lot.

 

send erudio our SB letter.

 

the 70% discount is a very telling letter and is useful information to others 

as for the default.

its not correct debt buyers can register a default months even years after last payment/acknowledgement the credit

 

report all texts to spam (7726)

block and bounce all emails

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...