Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Income from property while on ESA in the support group.


SantasHelper
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1216 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I need advice on this please.

 

I am on ESA and in the support group as I am not able to work due to disability.

I am approaching retirement age and I am ready for the bungalow but my husband wants to work.

 

We live in a seaside place and 6 months ago we bought a house with holiday rental accommodation on the upper floors and I live on the ground floor with my husband which is absolutely separate. It seemed like the ideal thing to do because he is here most of the time and can help me whenever I need it.

 

My husband runs the holiday rentals as a business and this is his only income.

His accountant said that as the property is in both of our names we will both have to submit tax returns even though I am unable to do any of the work for the holiday rentals and never will. 

 

I don't even want any of the revenue, we view it as his business but his accountant views it as a business partnership just because the house is both of our names.

 

I told his accountant that all I want to do is live here with my husband and the only reason that the building is in joint names is because the ground floor is our home but he said it makes no difference.

 

His accountant wants us both to sign a document to allow him to act on our behalf and the document states something like "all partners must sign". 

 

I am worried about how the DWP will view this, I don't want them thinking that I am working when I'm not.

Does anyone have any advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply dx100uk.

 

Yes I informed DWP immediately that we had moved.

It is clear from the address name that the property includes holiday accommodation so they do know that.

 

What change of circumstance?

If you mean did I tell them I am running a business, no I didn't because I'm not.

My husband has been self employed all his working life and his earnings have never had any bearing on my claim for ESA. His earnings are not taken into account for my disability claim. Please excuse me if I've not quite understood what you mean. 

 

Thank you unclebulgaria, I will contact the DWP on Monday and let them decide on the situation. There's no fraud going on here. What ever they decide I will still be disabled and too ill to work, and I always will be.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx100uk.

No I have never been asked for my husbands details on any of my forms because my disability benefit is not income related. (It is taxable but the amount I receive is always much less than my personal tax allowance so there is never any tax to pay.)

 

I fill in a capability for work questionnaire which is directed to myself only, and that's it.

 Other benefits are income related such as council tax benefit but I don't claim those as I wouldn't qualify.

 

Thank you for letting me know about your neighbour, it must have come as a shock to them.

Your neighbour's circumstances might be slightly different to mine, they could be claiming some income related benefits on top, or he/she may not have built up enough National Insurance Contributions prior to making his/her claim for disability benefit.

 

In those circumstances they do take the household income into account as far as I'm aware, but they do have a habit of changing things. 

 

That is a good point you make about the address, I shouldn't have assumed anything. 

 

I will make sure the DWP fully understand the situation and if I need to do anything different I am sure they will tell me. Thank you for your input, it is much appreciated.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...