Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PRA And old Halifax card debt - Received copy of CCA - not sure if it's correct


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1265 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

 Hi,

I sent off CCA requests and I've received 2 letters from PRA on Thursday about the same debt.

The first said "Please find enclosed documentation received to date, we are awaiting further documents in order to complete your request.

We have currently deemed this debt unenforceable which means we are not able to take court or further enforcement action against you to recover the outstanding balance."

 

They have sent lots of small print terms and conditions and has my name and address on, but no date or account number.

Also says Bank of Scotland, but the credit card was Halifax, but presumably that's because they're part of the same group.

 

Can't actually remember when the account was opened, but it could well have been before we moved to current address, but our new address is on the agreement (not sure if this makes a difference). It is not signed, and I'm aware it doesn't have to be.

The second letter received on the same day states

"We have enclosed copy documents as requested.

Please contact our office within 10 days of receipt of this letter where an agent will be able to assist you.

 

Our fully trained agents will discuss your account further with you and help you come to a mutually acceptable agreement in order to settle your outstanding balance."

 

This letter contained a few pages of credit card statements starting from 09/11/2009 (when the balance was £12,942) so not from the beginning.

The statements have my name and address on, but doesn't state which bank they refer to.

It doesn't say it is now enforceable, just implied with what is written above.

Do you think this is all correct?

 

Although the agreement has my name and address on, there is no date or account number (although the account number is on the covering letter and statements). How the letters were worded suggests that the agreement wasn't enough to make it enforceable but a few random statements are?

 

Thanks for any advice offered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to PRA And old Halifax card debt - Received copy of CCA - not sure if it's correct

We're just a bit worried about letting it get to the threatening stage, as we've been paying in a dmp for 10 years and never defaulted.

 

We were hoping they would accept a silly offer, but then were advised to do CCA requests.

So a few random statements doesn't make it enforceable?

 

Should we write back and state this?

Thanks for replying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trouble is that there's so much conflicting advice when you google and as we've got a clean slate so to speak (clean credit record), we're a bit worried to get in the state that we were in 10 years ago and end up with ccj's etc (which we luckily avoided last time). Thanks for the reassurance. Should we write back and say that what they've sent doesn't make it enforceable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both.

 

I've been on a couple of different sites to try and get advice and reassurance.

Just needed to know what PRA must send to make it enforceable so we can stop worrying as much.

 

Just didn't want to be fighting a losing battle and end up in court.

Would rather just pay a reduced figure if that's the case.

 

Thanks for the replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I can see that thank you.

 

I have read that it doesn't have to be signed and as with the first letter they sent they were aware it wasn't enforceable.

 

Was purely wondering about the 2nd letter containing a few random statements and they seem to think it's enforceable now.

 

I guess i was just looking for definitive proof that it's unenforceable before i start ignoring them.

 

This is all new to us after "blindly trusting" Payplan for 10 years and are just trying to suss out what to do without getting into trouble and tarring our record again, but thank you for your input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't claimed to have done loads of research. I've just been looking for answers online for a short period, but like I said before one says one thing and another something else. I've read this on debt camel and copied an extract. From this it seems as if they have sent what is needed? Call me dumb if you like, but i'm obviously far too trusting of people.

I will search for what you suggested, thanks.

What if they do send the CCA agreement?

How can you tell if it is right?

You have to be sent a “true copy” of the agreement – this doesn’t have to be a photocopy of the original agreement.  It must be legible and it must include:

  • your name and address when the account was opened;
  • the creditor’s name and address when the account was opened;
  • the terms and conditions of the account at that time, including the cost of credit (the Annual Percentage Rate), when you have to make payments and your cancellation rights; and
  • any other other documents that were mentioned in the Terms and Conditions.

It doesn’t have to have your signature on it. Indeed if you opened the account online you may well have signed it “digitally” and there is no document with your physical signature – this is perfectly legal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I should have been more specific.

 

It says credit agreement at the top with a load of terms and conditions.

They said it was unenforceable though, and then the statements make it enforceable?

 

I've copied what I received as an attachment (it wouldn't let me do the whole lot as it was too big and i'm not technical enough) but the first few pages are there.

 

 

 

rbs card part cca.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I did find this site 10 years ago, where I received help, but haven't used it again until recently. I have been searching for a similar situation for a short while, but didn't manage to find exactly what I was looking for.

I've obviously not been looking in the right place and I apologise for the annoyance I have caused you.

You seem to be very clued up on everything and know exactly how things work and I appreciate the help.

 

The statements sent have no heading whatsoever, just my name and address and account number and the list of expenditure. Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...