Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My understanding is that they won't provide the name to me whether the investigation is Live or Closed, & I have no legal rep as I didn't have P.I. Cover on my policy, & am intending to claim using OIC.org.uk, but remain completely stuck as they 100% cannot open a claim on the portal without both the Reg. No. & Name of the other driver.  
    • thanks again ftmdave, your words are verey encouraging and i do appreciate them. i have taken about 2 hours to think of a letter to write to the ceo...i will paste it below...also how would i address a ceo? do i just put his name? or put dear sir? do you think its ok?  i would appreciate feedback/input from anybody if anything needs to be added/taken away, removed if incorrect etc. i am writing it on behalf of my friend..she is the named driver  - im the one with the blue badge and owner of the car - just for clarification. thanks in adavance to everyone.       My friend and I are both disabled and have been a victim of disability discrimination on the part of your agents.   I have been incorrectly 'charged' by your agent 'excel parking' for overstaying in your car park, but there was no overstay. The letter I recieved said the duration of stay was 15 minutes but there is a 10 minute grace period and also 5 minutes consideration time, hence there was no duration of stay of 15 minutes.   I would like to take this oppertunity to clarify what happend at your Gravesend store. We are struggling finacially due to the 'cost of living crisis' and not being able to work because we are both disabled, we was attracted to your store for the 10 items for £10 offer. I suffer dyslexia and depression and my friend who I take shopping has a mobility disability. We went to buy some shopping at your Gravesend branch of Iceland on 28th of December 2023, we entered your car park, tried to read and understand the parking signs and realised we had to pay for parking. We then realised we didnt have any change for the parking machine so went back to look for coins in the car and when we couldnt find any we left. As my friend has mobility issues it takes some time for me to help him out of the car, as you probably understand this takes more time than it would a normal able bodied person. As I suffer dyslexia I am sure you'll agree that it took me more time than a normal person to read and understand the large amount of information at the pay & display machine. After this, it took more time than an able bodied person to leave the car park especially as I have to help my friend on his crutches etc get back into the car due to his mobility disability. All this took us 15 minutes.   I was the driver of my friends car and he has a blue badge. He then received a 'notice to keeper' for a 'failure to purchase a parking tariff'. On the letter it asked to name the driver if you wasnt the driver at the time, so as he wasnt the driver he named me. I appealed the charge and told them we are disabled and explained the situation as above. The appeal was denied, and even more so was totally ignored regarding our disabilities and that we take longer than an able bodied person to access the car and read the signs and understand them. As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us. I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge.     After being discriminated by your agent my friend decided to contact 'iceland customer care team' on my behalf and again explained the situation and also sent photos of his disabled blue badge and proof of disability. He asked the care team to cancel the charge as ultimately its Iceland's land/property and you have the power over excel parking to cancel it. Again we was met with no mention or consideration for our disability and no direct response regarding the cancellation, all we was told was to contact excel parking. He has replied over 20 times to try to get the 'care team' to understand and cancel this but its pointless as we are just ignored every time. I believe that Ignoring our disability is discrimination which is why I am now contacting you.     I have noticed on your website that you are 'acting' to ease the 'cost of living crisis' : https://about.iceland.co.uk/2022/04/05/iceland-acts-to-ease-the-cost-of-living-crisis/   If you really are commited to helping people in this time of crisis ..and especially two struggling disabled people, can you please cancel this charge as it will only cause more damage to our mental health if you do not.  
    • I've also been in touch via the online portal to the Police's GDPR team, to request the name of the other Driver. Got this response:   Dear Mr. ---------   Our Ref: ----------   Thank you for your request which has been forwarded to the Data Protection Team for consideration.   The data you are requesting is third party, we would not give this information directly to you.   Your solicitor or legal team acting on our behalf would approach us directly with your signed (wet) consent allowing us to consider the request further.   I note the investigation is showing as ‘live’ at this time, we would not considered sharing data for suggested injury until the investigation has been closed.   If you wish to pursue a claim once the investigation has been closed please signpost your legal team to [email protected]   Kind regards   ----------------- Data Protection Assistant    
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Hi everyone, Apologies for bringing up the same topic regarding these individuals. I wish I had found this forum earlier, as I've seen very similar cases. However, I need your help in figuring out what to do next because we've involved our partners/resellers. I work as an IT Manager in a company outside of the UK. We acquired a license from a certified reseller (along with a support agreement) and also obtained training sessions from them. The issue arose when we needed to register two people for the training sessions, so we used an external laptop for the second user to keep up with the sessions for only a month. During this period, the laptop was solely used for the training sessions. After two weeks, my boss forwarded an email to me from Ms Vinces, stating that we are using illicit software from SolidWorks. Since this has never happened to me or anyone we know, I went into panic mode and had a meeting with her. During the meeting, we explained that we were using an external laptop solely for the training sessions and that the laptop had not been used within the company since her email. She informed us that for such cases, there are demos and special licenses (though our reseller did not mention these types of licenses when we made our initial purchase). She then mentioned that we had utilized products worth approximately €25k and presented us with two options: either pay the agreed value or acquire SolidWorks products. We expressed that the cost was too high, and our business couldn't support such expenses. I assured her that we would discuss the matter with the company board and get back to her. After the meeting, we contacted the company reseller from whom we purchased the license, explained the situation, and mentioned the use of an external laptop. They said they would speak to Maria and help mediate the situation. We hoped to significantly reduce the cost, perhaps to that of a 1-year professional license. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The reseller mediated a value €2k less than what Maria had suggested (essentially, we would need to acquire two professional lifetime licenses and two years of support for a total of €23k). This amount is still beyond our means, but they insisted that the price was non-negotiable and wouldn't be reduced any further. The entire situation feels odd because she never provided us with addresses or other evidence (which I should have requested), and she's pressuring us to resolve the matter by the end of the month, with payment to be made through the reseller. This makes me feel as though the reseller is taking advantage of the situation to profit from it. Currently, we're trying to buy some time. We plan to meet with the reseller next week but are uncertain about how to proceed with them or whether we should respond to the mediator.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

control debt solutions and an IVA - owe more now then when i started.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4123 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You need to request full disclosure of all information they hold on you including recordings and/or transcripts of all telephone calls. You may be better to use the SAR template and ammend it for your needs:

 

Data Protection Act 1998

Subject Access Request

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx (or multiple numbers if more than one account)

 

Please supply me with all data that you hold on me. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, the following:-

 

1. The original signed, executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company, or by any previous creditor

3. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with ORIGINAL CREDITOR.

4. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

5. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

6. Details of any collection charges added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

7. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

8. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

9. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

10. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

When you make your complaint to TS via consumer direct ask that the info be passed to the OFT as well. Screen shot the website saying they offer IVAs ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the cca is a mess

 

1 no overall total

 

2 the total charge for credit is very wrong see Wilson v ist county

 

3 there is no interest rate quoted only a APR which i can only think a 2 year old has work out.

 

In regards what you do with info it is to you.

 

Let me be clear i would take this to court. However you may which to take legal help

 

hmmm onl just noticed this. what would my starting point be?:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

no threats as yet!! but im waiting for it cos ive not paid in 3 months. I just basically refused to pay the DMP company until they can explain to me why the debts gone up, why im being charged 15% when i was told its 10 and why the original dmp company went under and they took over the account without informing me (only found this out yesterday like) ive told them i want out anyway cos its one big joke!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have come out of the plan. i said to them they wernt getting a penny till they tell me why the debt has gone up not down. then he said if i dont pay they will close the account. so i just basically said frankly i dont care close the dam thing. i have asked for the money back and the "£80 start up fee" hes basically just said no and go away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive recivedall the documents from "in control. They havnt sent me anything regarding the loan, just credit cards. Nor have they sent me anything regarding payments made. Als there is a "decliration of authorit to act" which says "i confirm that your clear limited and in control debt soulutions" he told m your clear had gone under and in ontrol had took ver the accoun but it looks like they were/are the same company from the start:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh my god i am fuuuuuming!! i asked why i hadnt been sent a record of all the payments that had been made. he said i get that each month with a statement which i rarely get, only whe i ask for one. Ive asked for them all, he mailed me 1!!!! turns out in total theyve only been paying £10 a month!!!!! Out of a £45 paymetn, so much for them taking 15%!!!!

 

15% of £45 is £6.75 which leaves £38.25 unac****ed for..

Edited by Hacked_Off
Link to post
Share on other sites

just recieved this patronising email off them:

 

Dear ,

 

As I touched upon earlier, I don’t think that the outdated client logs will make sense as they normally come with today’s date on! Regardless of when it was for. The client log you are talking about could have been from a month that a payment couldn’t go to one or more of your creditors as control of the account could have changed or there payment details may have been un-certified etc etc.

 

I am becoming quite concerned as to who you are getting advice from; I would like to remind you that in line with our terms and conditions, which I am more than happy to forward on to you, we have done absolutely nothing out of turn. If they have been asking you to gain such information I would also be concerned with the information you are providing them i.e. the payment history on your debt management plan etc etc.

 

Furthermore, and once again, have you concentrated any of your energies on applying for a debt relief order? I believe that this would be time better spent as I do think that you qualify and there fore could see all of your debt written off!

 

Better use of your time I think J

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

haha yeah. i said to him either you send me all the statements or ill send u a nice letter and you'll have to.. hes sent them all before like :D . my barclaycard has gone to a debt collectors, they didnt even tell me, i have the letters that have been sent to in control from mercers. also my token letters to welcome, barclays, capital have bee ignored.so i am resending along with a cca. am i right that i have to pay them until the accounts are in dispute? i am also sending mercers a cca. in control have told them of my address so once they work out the agreement has been closed im sure ill get a letter so i figure its prob best to cca them now before i get the obligitory pay us now, or well get you letter.

 

halifax have also ignored my charges letter, dont think ive mentioned them in here. I pay a bill every month for my nan, who has no bank account. every month i go in pay in cash then check my balance then pay via standin order. its never been a problem until this month. I go a letter saying "insufficient funds.....35 charge" the money was there i checked and printed it off. so ive sent them a letter "benefits administration ac of 1992..." whic has bee ignored. so im re sending to there customer relations, hq and my branch :D the charge is supposed to come out tomorrow so well see if they take it.:mad:

 

thanks for the comments btw appreciate it loads

 

also i have reported in control to consumer direct:D were they the right ppl to complain to? wasnt sure so did it anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

recieved these letters today:

 

DCA001.jpg

 

ive not recieved a responce from welcoe finance soim assuming thats what the dca is refering to. is it worth sending them a prove it letter?

 

cap1letter001.jpg

 

this one is refering to the token offer letter i sent them.

 

halifax1001.jpg

 

halifax2001.jpg

 

this one is refering to a halifax charge. the charge was meant to come out today and hasnt, so what does that tell you ;) so they are basically talking out there a hole and they have twisted what i said in the originl letter. im waiting to hear back from rbs about a basic ac**** and im waiting on a post office account for my benefits to go in once thats done im gonna tell halifax to stuff it. he says i was "expecting a payment to go in the same day" this again is a load of waffle. i paid the money i myself before paying the standing order.

Edited by Hacked_Off
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday i recieved this:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

1st Credit Ltdisattempting tocontact the above named regarding a personal matter.

 

Your address has been suplied as apossible address for our subject who was previously resident at:- (previous address)

 

Please contact our offices immediatly on our telephone number 0870 164 20 56 and quote the above 1st credit reference number at which time further information can be provided.

 

if you are not the individual we are attempting to contact or have information that may assist please call us at your earliest convienience. on telephone number 0870 164 2056, in order that we may correct our records.

 

If no responce is recieved within ten days of issue we will assume that you are the individual we wish to contact and will of course ensure that all relevent correspondance is sent to you

 

Yours faithfully

 

1st credit ltd

 

so they assume that just because you may not respond that you may be the individual concerned this is taking the p"@##, even by worst credit's stance.

 

So If I write to first credit thus

 

 

Mp Plumbers

1 any street

any town

somewhere in england.

 

 

 

Dear mr worst credit,

 

I have been informed by one of your employee's that you have a problem with a leaking tap in your toilets and this may present a a slip hazard.

 

I will be along to deal with this leak within the next 7 days. If this is not the case please contact me immedietly. should you not respond within the next 7 days then I will assume that you accept my visit and, will attempt tp fix the problem and charge you accordingly for my visit whether the problem has been resolved or not

 

 

 

yoyrs faithfully

 

m.r plumber.

 

 

You might think that this response is a little bizzarre, however its the same tactic that first credit are trying to employ

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...