Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Banks demanding probate


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1459 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You do need probate if they say you do.  Banks etc. have their own limits on how much they will release without probate and there's no getting round it.  They could set it at £5k if they wanted because a Grant of Probate is the legal authority to access the funds.

 

I have just gone through the process and after some initial difficulties in paying over the phone they've dealt with application with record speed.  Just do it and you'll have access to the money much faster than if you try and argue the point.

Edited by hightail
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, arsen lupin said:

We're seeking a possible alternative for people in our position, who have only one financial institution to answer too, we feel some provision should be made for those in our situation. Possibly through a county court and simplified process.

 

Applying for probate is incredibly simple these days if the estate is uncomplicated.  I honestly can’t imagine how any alternative could be considered a simplified process.  If you’re worried about a tax liability coming to light because of transfers before your mother died that’s another matter, nothing to do with the process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's two simple forms and £215 pounds for a return of £60k.  Massively simplified since the last time I had to do it some years ago.  I honestly don't understand your comment that it's a 'larger issue'.  The .gov.uk website makes it perfectly clear.

 

Contact each asset holder (for example a bank or mortgage company) to find out if you’ll need probate to get access to their assets. Every organisation has its own rules. (my bold)

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, FTMDave said:

I've twice had to deal with dead people's estates.  On both occasions the banks had a low figure from £1 to a couple of grand or so that they would release on production of a death certificate.  Then from around £2000 to £5000 you had to swear an oath before a solicitor.  But above five grand or so it was probate.

It's unbelieveably simplified since the last time I had to do it.  Banks etc. will release much larger sums these days but even if you do go down probate route even that is simplified and streamlined.  From posting off the forms it took under two weeks for me to get the Grant of Probate, this even though I'd had an email confirmation of receipt of the paperwork and a statement that it could take 'up to' eight weeks.  There is now no need to do anything more, no swearing an oath, that's it grant pops through your letterbox and job done.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...