Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oh I see! thats confusing, for some reason the terms and conditions that Evri posted in that threads witness statement are slightly different than the t&cs on packlinks website. Their one says enter into a contract with the transport agency, but the website one says enter into a contract with paclink. via website: (c) Each User will enter into a contract with Packlink for the delivery of its Goods through the chosen Transport Agency. via evri witness statement in that thread: (c) Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency I read your post at #251, so I should use the second one (and changing the screenshot in the court bundle), since I am saying I have a contract with Evri? Is that correct EDIT: Oh I understand the rest of your conversation. you're saying if I was to do this i would have to fully adjust my ws to use the consumer rights act instead of rights of third parties. In that case should I just edit the terms and stick with the third parties plan?. And potentially if needed just bring up the CRA in the hearing, as you guys did in that thread  
    • First, those are the wrong terms,  read posts 240-250 of the thread ive linked to Second donough v stevenson should be more expanded. You should make refernece to the three fold duty of care test as well. Use below as guidance: The Defendant failed its duty of care to the Claimant. As found in Donoghue v Stevenson negligence is distinct and separate to any breach of contract. Furthermore, as held in the same case there need not be a contract between the Claimant and the Defendant for a duty to be established, which in the case of the Claimant on this occasion is the Defendant’s duty of care to the Claimant’s parcel whilst it is in their possession. By losing the Claimant’s parcel the Defendant has acted negligently and breached this duty of care. As such the Claimant avers that even if it is found that the Defendant not be liable in other ways, by means of breach of contract, should the court find there is no contract between Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant would still have rise to a claim on the grounds of the Defendant’s negligence and breach of duty of care to his parcel whilst it was in the Defendant’s possession, as there need not be a contract to give rise to a claim for breach of duty of care.  The court’s attention is further drawn to Caparo Industries plc v Dickman (1990), 2 AC 605 in which a three fold test was used to determine if a duty of care existed. The test required that: (i) Harm must be a reasonably foreseeable result of the defendant’s conduct; (ii) A relationship of proximity must exist and (iii) It must be fair, just and reasonable to impose liability.  
    • Thank you. here's the changes I made 1) removed indexed statement of truth 2) added donough v Stevenson in paragraph 40, just under the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 paragraph about reasonable care and skill. i'm assuming this is a good place for it? 3) reworded paragraph 16 (now paragraph 12), and moved the t&cs paragraphs below it then. unless I understood you wrong it seems to fit well. or did you want me to remove the t&cs paragraphs entirely? attached is the updated draft, and thanks again for the help. WS and court bundle-1 fourth draft redacted.pdf
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

DLA APPEAL for a child


Louisev25
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2277 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I have recently been refused dla for my child

she is 12 years old sees a consultant for eneurisis clinic

wets in the day and night,

 

shes on medication,

also shes under a consultant being assessed for adhd and autism,

she has 1 to 1 at school and

 

i sent in a mandatory reconsideration on the 4th aug looked at it allready again,

i sent in diaries,

consultant letters,

paedtrician letters,

repeat prescription,

side effects of her medication,

a full patient summary

 

yet still they said they have not changed their decision,

 

im furious and dont know what to do to appeal.

I also have autism, dyslexia, dyspraxia, deprssion with social anxieties,

me attending court i would not be able to cope with people face to face

 

please can anyone help

thankyou

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

To appeal the decision, you need to send form SSCS1, available here, to the Tribunals Service. You also need to enclose a copy of the "Notice of Mandatory Reconsideration" or whatever other letter the DWP sent you when they told you that the reconsideration request has not been successful. There is a guidance booklet at the HMCTS (Tribunals Service) website, link here.

 

If you really can't attend the Tribunal it's possible to request a "paper hearing", where the appeal panel will look at the evidence you've sent (and that sent by the DWP) and make a decision without you having to be physically present. However, I'd recommend that you do attend if at all possible, as the success rate is higher when the claimant is there to talk to the panel and answer any questions they may have. You can take a friend or relative for moral support, and you can also have a professional representative with you - talk to the Citizens Advice Bureau about where you might get in touch with such a person. It's definitely worth talking to people with experience in these situations since appeals on behalf of children can be a little more involved than those concerning an adult. This is because all children need a certain amount of assistance. Therefore it's not enough just to show that your child needs help with some things: you have to show that the help she needs is more than would generally be expected for children in that age group.

 

Note also that the Tribunal, although it is part of the Courts and Tribunals Service, is not like a court. It will be a lot less formal. There are no robes or wigs, for example, and the room where the hearing takes place will not be a courtroom like the ones you see in the news or on TV shows. The appeal panel will consist of a judge, a doctor and possibly a third person who will be someone with professional experience of working with people who have disabilities.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

My daughter is 11 years old and has multiple health issues,

a severe autoimmune disease

as well as severe gastro problems,

 

she has to have a very restricted diet and there can be no cross contamination of any sort of food, shampoo, toiletries, etc etc as it is detrimental to her the same with towels, bedding etc etc the list goes on.

 

She cannot go swimming and is never invited to parties or outings.

She is also Vitamin D deficient,

has bowed legs,

contact dermatitis,

social anxiety,

delayed speech,

 

has a PEG tube in her tummy,

we have to use catheters and pull ups every day.

 

She was in receipt of DLA for almost 9 years and now has been refused as the DWP say she has the same needs as a child of her age,

we did a mandatory consideration and the same because she is like any other child of her age.

So the DWP are penalising a little girl,

any help advice would be great

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

The advice in the post above yours is excellent.

Are there any charities specifically in relation to your child's illness? If so, they may be able to help with an appeal.

Try not to take it personally, DWP is apparently on a mission to reduce the benefits bill by any means possible and many, many people have to appeal to get benefits awarded for illness or disability these days, however the appeal success rate is quite high (over 60%) so don't despair.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may get more responses if you start a new thread of your own.

 

At 11, there would be certain things that she would be expected to be able do herself in terms of self care, unless she has other disabilities which means she requires help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...