Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Anyone ever dealt with "Parking Solutions 24"? - ** CANCELLED **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3320 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

 

As above, new NTK from these goons above. Not heard of them before and a quick search on this forum turns up nothing.

 

I will post up a redacted copy of the NTK shortly once my scanner wakes up, but in the meantime, a few interesting points of note;

 

Their NTD (dated 27/01) bears a BPA logo, and on the back it has details on how to appeal to POPLA. The NTK (dated 02/03) has no BPA logo, instead gives details on how to appeal to IAS. A quick squizz at the BPA and IPC websites show Parking Solutions 24 as being members of the BPA. So their NTK already contains incorrect and potentially misleading information. Good start.

 

Parking Solutions 24 have displayed in a big red box prominently at the top of the notice that they are "The Creditor". I thought the true creditor would have been the landowner, if any "credit" actually existed in the first place?

 

The original PCN was for £60. It still is, but they've added an £18 "Administration Charge (inc VAT)". Apart from the £2.50 DVLA fee, and let's say a quid for the envelope and paper, what's the other £14.50 for, I wonder?

 

The NTK contains no photographic evidence, nor any link or instructions to allow me to access said evidence. If I remember correctly this is a requirement under PoFA?

 

Any thoughts before I hit them with the soft appeal letter?

 

Cheers

CD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good spot. I checked on there and it doesn't have any photos. Just has them as "pending".

 

I probably should have said, on the NTD it says that the reason for issue was "Other", and in the box at the bottom they've written "on foot path".

 

I checked with the driver on the day and they said that the car was parked in what looked like a normal space between two other cars. Having checked the car park on Google Earth there appears to be a footpath running between spaces in a straight line, if that makes sense. However according to the driver the markings on the road are quite badly faded in places and are unclear. Plus it is a poorly lit section of the car park and they arrived before dawn, while it was still dark.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, the address Armadillo posted is the one that's on the NTK.

 

I believe that's the case, PCN Parking Solutions / Solutions Labs seem to just be handling the payment / appeals side of things. Although they give a separate address (or rather a PO Box number).

 

If they're BPA members after all, I'll just submit the standard appeal, then smack them upside the head with GPEOL at POPLA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Game, set and match.

 

Logged onto PaymyPCN's website to check the status of my appeal and now have the following;

 

Status:

Obligation Discharged

 

No information required

The drivers obligation has been discharged therefore appeal information is no longer required.

 

And the current balance has gone from £78 to £0.

 

Guess that's that, then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's weird. It doesn't say "Cancelled" anywhere, and if I click on "Pay PCN now" it still gives me the option to enter my card details to pay £60.

 

I'd be expecting to see that on there if I'd provided the name of the driver, which I haven't.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...