Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Advice re bailiff collecting for a council parking ticket


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3642 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

can someone clarify for me

 

I filed an out time/extension formsTe7 and Te9 to sort a parking fine I had no knowledge about until bailiffs contacted me.

 

A bailiff came around and left a walking possession on my work van ,sign written ( he has even stated this on form).

 

I rang him and to let him that know that I have sent the forms to the council

and to ask him about seizing my van as I had a look around on the web and it seems a work van is exempt.

 

He very vocally, I might add told me to get my facts right

and he had every right to as the law had changed

and put he phone down on me!!

 

Can someone let me know who's right.

 

Hi

 

can someone clarify for me

 

I filed an out time/extension formsTe7 and Te9 to sort a parking fine I had no knowledge about until bailiffs contacted me.

 

A bailiff came around and left a walking possession on my work van ,sign written ( he has even stated this on form).

 

I rang him and to let him that know that I have sent the forms to the council

and to ask him about seizing my van as I had a look around on the web and it seems a work van is exempt.

 

He very vocally, I might add told me to get my facts right

and he had every right to as the law had changed

and put he phone down on me!!

 

Can someone let me know who's right.

Ps the van is not on finance and owed by me personally. It's value is approx £1500 I mention. This as the bailiff mentioned something about the value of the van in regards to the fee they are attempting to collect

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should have sent the forms to the TEC at Northampton.

 

Prior to the bailiff coming round you should have received several letters from the Council plus a summons to Court followed by a letter from the bailiff company advising you

of the PCN plus fees and charges and you had 7 days to contact the bailiff to arrange payment or a bailiff would come round and add an extra £235 to the bill. Did you not

receive any of them? If not have you recently moved address and perhaps not informed DVLA of your new address?

 

Has this happened recently as there is now no such thing as a walking possession?

 

The bailiff or Enforcement Agent as they are now called is able under the new legislation to take control of tools of the trade that are valued over £1350. It is therefore

questionable if he can take control of your vehicle since such a small amount is involved over the £1350 and I doubt that the vehicle would get anywhere close to that figure if it were to be sold at auction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reply.

Yes I have sent all forms to Tec.

The first I knew about any of this is when I found a seize letter in post box.

 

I was told after ringing TEC that no enforcement would continue once my application had gone in.

 

I had received conformation from TEC that they have received my paperwork but the bailiff still decided to call back.

 

I tried to have a civil conversation over the phone with him,

I don't know what charm school he went to !!

 

I know they must see conflict all the time but wow he certainly got out of the worn side of bed.

 

I shall know wait to see what comes back from the TEC

thanks for advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sending them off to the TEC is just a temporary measure and no guarantee that the Council will accept your reason. Whichever way the decision goes come back to us if you

need more help.

 

Bailiffs don't do charm but with any luck you might be able to get him off your back without having to pay his fees. That is when you ring him up and tell him to get his facts right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Meantime, why don't you phone the council and check what address they have been writing to. They will have mailed out at least three documents before now - if the address is wrong, you need to get it sorted out to prevent this happening again in future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...