Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @Man in the middle I've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

A little help and an update


matmondez
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6324 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 4 weeks later...

Well after ringing my local court in Hull for the last 3 weeks every other day just about i was told that northhampton had lost my paperwork. Great!! Anyways it has now been resolved and my court date is March the 14th.

 

This has been quite a journey which i now feel is comming to an end (thank god)

 

I personally think the MCOL route is the easier option but not the best, i would strongly sugest gettin a N1 form and delivering it to your local court in person. Less chance of loss of data in transit from Northampton to wherever also your local court would prefer this route. Not to mention your not restricted in chars to what you an put in your P.O.C. in a N1.

 

I believe you can even download N1 in a pdf format to fill in.

 

I know i might be a minority but why take a risk when you don`t have to.

 

 

 

Anyways been away a while, Hi Garry!! remember me, and Hi Martin howz it going?

 

 

Are SCM submitting there defence 14 days b4 Court Date?

 

 

 

 

Thanks in Advance

 

A bit deflated but never gone!

 

Matt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again Matt,

 

Have you got directions? If so, post them up and someone'll tell you exactly what to submit. In fact, its probably best if you posted the complete wording of the order.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thx for reply Garry,

 

Will post directions on here 2morow.

 

Are Lloyds bothering to send their bundle these days or is just random whether they do or not.

I read a thread on here the other day that a girl actually went to court only to find out that they settled the night before, how stressed was she.

I think if the courts knowing that statistically the chance of the banks sols turning up is very very small that some action should be taken.

Courts are busy at the best of times and the banks are having a blatent disregard for this.

 

Time will tell eh Garry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a read below ppl let m know your thoughts, to me this sounds like if they don`t get the paperwork done within timescale and sent good chance i will win by default. Altho i guess someone is gunna say this is a standard letter from local court and SCM can submitt their paperwork last min.

 

Thoughts quick im a bit excited....

 

 

DEPUTY DISTRICT JUDGE JOE BLOGGS has considered the statements of case allocation questionaires filed and allocated the clam to the small claims track.

The hearin of the clam will take place at 11:30 on the 14 March 2007 at Ground Floor, blar blar address. and should take no loner than 1hr 30 mins.

 

The court must be informed immediately if the case is settled by agreement before the hearing date.

 

Each party shall deliver to every other party and to the court office copies of all documents (including any experts report) on which he intends to rely on at the hearing no later than 14 days before the hearing.

 

The original documents shall be brought to the hearing, a copy of the defence.

Defendant shall file 14 days prior to the above hearing all documents relatig to the calculation and qualification of charges and interest debited from the claimants accoun in relation to the claimants purported breaches of contract.

 

All parties and other witnesses to file their statements with the Court and serve on the other side 14 days before the hearing. Failure to comply with this will result in the parties not being permitted to use the evidance without leave of the court.

 

**Other matters are listed at the same time as this case. The start time may be delayed, however every effortwill be made to adhere to the appointed time **

 

Date 29 Jan 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Matt

Our case was due in Hull on Tues 30th Jan.

SCM rang on Firday 26th Jan to say they were going to settle in full.

If you ask me the staff at SCM are as P***** off with Lloyds as we are.

They told me they can't offer to settle any of the claims until they get the ok from Lloyds.

However, the chap also said that providing customers had not claimed for charges that are not refundable all cases are settled in the end.

I know this is all very stressful but it's well worth it when you "WIN".

Good luck

Pam

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Matt

Ignore last post , pressed wrong key!

No Lloyds didn't send any docs to us or the court.

As I see it if they haven't got any evidence how can they send it?

Don't worry you will get your money but probably not until the day you are due in court.

Chin up

Pam

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to your evidence, you need everything from the Basic Court Bundle from the templates library, all correspondence between you and Lloyds, your statements or account information provided under your S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), a schedule, a transcript of the interview with Peter McNamara BBC radio -Sept 2004- sound file & transc, and edit this ‘statement of evidence’ to suit your claim and add it to your bundle too - New strategy for Allocation Questionaires

 

It is a lot of paper, but you do need 3 copies of everything. File one at the court, serve one to Lloyds sols and keep one for yourself (this should include the originals).

 

Upon the deadline for document exchange, if they haven't either settled (fairly likely) or submitted documents (very unlikely), then see this thread - SC&M court bundle non-compliance

  • Haha 1

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

CONGRATULATIONS!!!

 

Great job Matt, very well done!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:lol::D

 

I'll get your title changed for you.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

eh up martin

 

im drunk right now, all i can say really is the sleepless nights pay.

What a feeling mate, it relly is something i will remember.

 

your journey has an end mate. wont be to long....Still watchin ur thread.

 

Best of luck Martin

 

Garry thx a bunch

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...