Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BH sold debt being paid to DLC


Wicked_witch
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3810 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

We have an agreement with BH to pay back our debt to them after defaulting due to my husband having to leave work due to a disability. We've always paid the agreed amounts on time, no CCJ or anything, but they've now sold the debt to DLC.

 

The debt is only £250ish now, so I'm hoping if we go about it in the right way we can pay the lot off for a good discount (will have to borrow the money from parents as we're stuck on benefits :x). They've said they 'need' a statement of outgoings etc for that, but they can't insist on that without a court order as I understand and I don't plan to give them one single thing or piece of info I'm not obliged to.

 

Can you advise me on the best way to frame things in a letter for a positive outcome?

 

We actually offered BH £200 in settlement just a couple of months ago and they said no, they had to have the lot... now they've presumably accepted a much smaller payment from DLC. Smart bunch really :madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good idea to get a copy of the agreement was it pre 2007?.

So you have sent the request to DLC,I am all for making them work hard as they now own the debt.

 

You also need a copy of the current statement to see how much they think you owe.

 

When it is all settled offer DLC 20% of the amount outstanding in F&F settlement,but before doing so consult us, as the wording of the offer is quite critical

 

FS

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Right, after a hiatus because DLC first said we didn't need to pay for the agreement, then sent a reply demanding £1, we've had a letter back saying they are waiting for a copy of our original statement.

 

A couple of questions- first, they say that if they are unable to forward a copy of the original agreement they will be able to "supply a true copy of the document which will comply with section 77-79" of the CCA. Is this a different document or...what?

 

They also refer to a ruling 'McGuffick V RBS' which states that 'the bringing of proceedings is not enforcement', and this includes demanding payment. Again, I'm not sure what this means in real terms or how it's relevant?

 

It all sounds like empty vague threats to be honest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As they own the debt they have 14 days to produce the original CCA if they don't and it is unlikely,send default letter to them.

 

The true copy,is their interpretation of what the agreement would have looked like,which they are allowed to do but they must also supply copy of the terms and conditions that where in force at the time you opened the account,plus copies of the up to date amendments.

 

Google the McGuffick v RBS case they refer to,it has validity.

 

They should not be able to take you to court without the original agreement,but a number of Judges will accept proof that you have been paying them as acknowledgement of the debt,wait until they have responded to your CCA and see what they produce.

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are saying that if they haven't had it from BH within 21 days they will contact us again- how does that fit in with the 14 day window, and when would the 14 days begin please? because if it would be from the date they received our second letter with the PO attached, they've already had them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once the letter you recommend is sent, where do things go from there? Having read the McGuffick case, it seems they can still ask for payment, send default notices and even begin court proceedings, so is that the point to offer a full and final sum?

 

Thanks for all your help and sorry for all the questions!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please wait for a response from the DCA.

Yes F&F would be appropriate but wait for the response, as this is a minefield your F&F requirements have to be worded correctly.

 

As the debt is £250ish, the DCA will have paid a little more for it based on the fact that you have made regular payments.

 

Please check your credit file and tell us what appears if anything

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I won't do anything without checking back here.

 

As far as I know, the BH debt shows as permanently 'more than 6 months in arrears' as although we have always made regular payments the older, full payments still show up as late. Other than that, my record is clean.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter was sent on the 21/10.

 

Now, my husband is getting very stressed about this and wants to make an offer to pay an amount before Christmas. Assuming I can't stop him before we get any more paperwork, how much should we be offering and will they expect us to lowball them (so refuse the first amount on principle) or should we offer the full amount we can pay from the outset? I know there are various stages to go through ideally, but if he gets very stressed he will just go behind my back and do it anyway, probably wrongly!!!

 

According to my reading, the debt does become enforceable once they do provide the proper paperwork, so what is the ultimate goal of stringing things out for now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is more than a chance that DLC may say they are unable to obtain the original agreement,they may produce a recon copy of what they consider the agreement may have looked like.There are a number of possibilities as to their response.

 

Based on the fact that you estimate you owe £250ish,you need to determine the exact amount,although you say you have already offered £200 and they refused,was the offer made to BH before the debt was sold?

 

What is the exact amount?

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

They sent another letter today, but I literally have no idea what it said, because the dog got to it before we did :/ But my husband rang DLC up and after a lot of to and fro and talking to management, they've agreed to a final settlement of £61. They'll be sending a letter, so I'll update then and make sure it's all watertight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...