Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell and cat debt


buster991
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3910 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have sent a CCA to Lowells as they are chasing me for a cat debt,

 

I have been paying a small amount each month direct to catalogue,

 

even while paying this they sold the debt to Lowells, or though I have not received a notice of assignment.

 

I have now received a recon credit agreement, it has my name and address on the top, but no signature, date or account number on any of the pages.

 

I have read lots of threads and my conclusion is that it does not matter if they have a recon copy of the agreement, and signature.

 

The amount is for 870, I am just going to send letter reclaiming the charges back of 225 to the cat company.

 

I am not trying to get out of paying this, I would just rather carry on paying the catologue company direct and not to Lowells.

 

Can anyone advise me differently

 

Thanks for any replies B

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi a reconstituted agreement does not need signatures, BUT must have:

 

Your name and address at the inception of the agreement and the creditors name and address.

All the Ts & Cs from inception to closure of the account and any amendments /variations made during the life of the agreement.

If the recon you have complies with the above and the agreement was entered into after April 2007 a judge may with other evidence such as statements showing usage of the account e.g. goods ordered, delivered and paid for that a liability subsists and the debt is enforceable.

 

Did you receive notification from Lowell that it has purchased this account? From what you say you must have had some written communication from Lowell otherwise you would not have made the CCA request.

 

This communication would be the NOA>

 

Have you checked CRA files for entries? If not it would be a good idea to do so.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thank you your reply,

 

I have checked again, and it does have the creditors name in very small writing ( I missed it before) and my details, and yes I have had communication from Lowell chasing the debt, and it was taken out after 2007.

 

My credit file says Lowell own this now and the amount is minus the charges, but on the letter they are chasing for full amount.

 

I am now considering sending a full and final letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The amount claimed MUST be disputed Lowell this is another one of their sly tricks, they cannot claim the full original balance.

 

A formal complaint to:

 

Ms Sarah de Tute

Director of Legal & Colpiance

The Lowell Group.

 

I what you need to do.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,

 

Sorry having a blonde moment,I have just just checked my credit file again now,

its the default amount that is lower than the balance,

as the cat have since added the charges which is the amount they are claiming now.

 

No further charges have been added since Lowell have had it.

 

What now ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The amount claimed MUST be disputed Lowell this is another one of their sly tricks, they cannot claim the full original balance.

 

A formal complaint to:

 

Ms Sarah de Tute

Director of Legal & Colpiance

The Lowell Group.

 

I what you need to do.

 

Should I send a formal complaint now, as the amount they are claiming IS showing on my credit file, it includes the charges. confused :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

how have you calc'd the charges reclaim?

 

using CISHEET at their int rate?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thanks for you reply, Yes I have calculated the amount using 8% interest, as they don't charge interest, is this correct?

 

It doesn't wipe it out completely, about a quarter of the amount owing.

 

I am paying a small amount off each month direct to Catalogue. they are receiving it as its showing on my credit file.

The Catologue would not accept the monthly payment of 5.00 that I can offer, hence why it was sold to Lowell, I have carried on paying the 5.00.

 

Thanks for any help B

Link to post
Share on other sites

they do & they don't.

 

you need to check their statements carefully.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no sadly not

 

you'll p'haps have to use the Statint sheet then.

 

as the compounded one will be not for 8% stat by CI interest.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is a charges cover letter in the green library tab up to

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thanks for your reply,

 

I have addressed the letter to Cat company, sending template letter regarding claiming the charges back.

 

I have also started a letter disputing the amount Lowell are asking for, is this the correct way to go ? Shall I offer a full and Final amount at this stage or monthly payments,

If I wait to hear back from the cat company I am worried that they may start court proceedings.

 

Thanks B

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am very cross now,

 

I have been reading a thread, SHOP DIRECT DEPT and its exactly the same as mine, but the outcome is different,

 

sent letter 1 and 2 (as in post) asking Cat Company to except lower payment of 10.00 per month or I would reduce my payments to £1,

and both letters had a reply of a flat NO. Within days I had a letter from Lowell, Cat company had sold it on. so for me they did not accept lower payments.

 

Have I got cause to complain to someone ?

 

I lowered my payment to 5.00 per month and have been paying this ever since, and now having to deal with Lowell.

 

Anyway I must move forward on this, letters to send :x

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they've sold it

its for a very good reason.

 

prob the charges

 

but that cant be the only reason.

 

theres nothing sadly to stop them selling the debt on

even if you are in a dispute as such

 

lets see what develops

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they've sold it

its for a very good reason.

 

prob the charges

 

but that cant be the only reason.

 

theres nothing sadly to stop them selling the debt on

even if you are in a dispute as such

 

lets see what develops

 

dx

 

Hi again, I would love to know what the very good reason is !!, I have never stopped paying them, just reduced the amount, they obviously didn't like it !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx, your following all my threads.

 

Having checked the D/N on this account as well I have found that the dates on it don't add up either.

 

Basically it was sent on the Sat 27th March and to pay the arrears by 9 April, therefore not the 14 days to pay.

 

Uploaded for you

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]46730[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

certainly invalid

 

and also invalid because the DN sum contains penalty charges too.

 

did you get that staint sheet done?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Yes I did approx 230 of charges including 8%,

 

I have also received another letter today stating that if they dont receive payment or part payment within 5 days they will instruct solicitors,

although I sent a letter disputing the amount and said that I will continue to make 5.00 payment per month,

this was sent recorded del and signed for on 28/9.

 

The letter received today is dated 30/9, rec today 3/10, ( 1 DAY TO REPLY !!)

 

So now with the D/N being invalid what now ?

 

I am trying not to get confused with each of my invalid D/N especially when they are running together and both with Lowell.

 

Thanks again

 

B

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cant harm your rating anymore

 

just keep paying what you said

and get the reclaim in.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

The claim has already been sent to Cat company on the same day, the 26th Sept.

 

I am paying the Cat company, should I be paying direct to Lowell's now, that it has been sold to them, I know they are receiving it as its coming off the balance as showing on my credit file.

 

Regards

 

B

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...