Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Computeach


a.ferra
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6446 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please can you advise me, went onto the computeach website and asked for a call back from a salesperson, when I spoke to the salesperson I described exactly the course I needed for my work, I was advised to take the CIW webmaster course. I told the salesperson that I wanted to start the course at a later date, however the salesperson advised me that the cost of the course would increase later, so I agreed to purchase the course at that time but start it later. I was given a payment plan with Clydesdale finance of no interest for the 1st year. I was told that I would receive the course shortly, however I did not receive them for 2 months. When I received the package I realised it was for a different course, after speaking to computeach they sent me the materials for the correct course, or so I thought. When looking at the materials I realised that I had been completely sold the wrong course, I originally explained to the salesperson how important it was for me to learn about 'flash' however this course does not cover this subject at all, most of the subjects are irrelevant to me. I called computeach before the course had started and explained that this was not the course I had been sold and therefore wanted to cancel the course and cancel the credit agreement, however they have told me that there was a two week get out clause from the booking date, but considering I didn't receive the course materials for 2 months how was I supposed to use this clause, I have never received any contracts and have never received any terms or conditions, the only documents I have received is the credit agreement, please help how do I get out of this contract?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you paid anything yet ?

If you have a DD set up on your

bank account I would cancell it.

If you received any materials

then return them.

Data Protection Act sent to Nationwide 19/05/06.

Statements received 24/06/06 - Charged £1,954.50 :eek:

Prelim letter sent to Charles Bacon 27/06/06 :)

Cannot refund letter from Sarah Watson 07/07/06 :rolleyes:

L.B.A. sent to Charles Bacon 18/07/2006 ;)

Claim deemed filed 30/08/2006 8)

* REFUND TIME * 15/09/2006 :p

*£1945.50 + £443.37 interest + £62.00 Court fees*

** DONATION MADE **

Link to post
Share on other sites

i assume you have paid a couple of months...

 

but dont panic too much, there will be someone useful within the management structure and being mis-sold a product over the phone is quite a serious thing. if you have the persons name you will get much further, keep mentioning it and keep saying mis-sold.

i would first of all speak to the sales manager, might be difficult if its a call centre and the staff put you off, in that case ask for contact details for the management structure, starting with MD, the manager will soon come on the phone.

 

if that doesnt get you anywhere, writing is the only way, and this time just go direct to MD/CEO.

there is also trading standards with regards to remote sales, if you have to write, send them a copy and make it clear you have done so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This would come under DSR regulations. IF it could be classed as goods(unsure, you probably could as it is an integral part of the course) then you have 7 days from the DAY AFTER you recieved the goods to cancel the contract. If it is already over 7 days, then I would agree with what rob has said above regarding the mis-selling of the product. You are entitled to a refund as the product is not as described.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...