Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Repossession questioned by deeds not being signed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3761 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you insist on using the untried and untested 'ideas' posted on this thread, I beg you to at least use them in conjunction with tried and tested methods, don't put your home at risk as a result of accepting these 'ideas'.

 

I am personally deeply saddened that you have come across this thread and now considering these ' ideas' - if you can, please speak to a Solicitor first, even if it is just an initial discussion meeting.

 

I am still using "tried and tested" methods but they are not working

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

So Ben you have a letter from my friends to their solicitor ASKING for this to be done??

I think not

 

What ?

 

Of course I don't have a letter from your 'friend' to their solicitor

 

Why would I have it and how would I have got it ?

 

Makes no sense.

 

Yes Mark, I am Bones

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ben,

No because you will find NO letter from any borrower stating please send this on to the LR, only they send it to the LENDER.

Your so sad that people are trying these methods, well as I've said before and you and others have over looked here

There are 2 TWO cases which have stopped all possession hearing because of the question of deeds not being signed.

I would also point out that until the Norgan case which I am sure you, or may be not agree had no help from CAG was done as a first ' TEST' case but that is only any good if the borrower can pay the extra and has the time to do it within the term and then the rates go up and up.

As said before there is no reason for you to worry I am sure a D/J and C/J know what they are doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ben,

No because you will find NO letter from any borrower stating please send this on to the LR, only they send it to the LENDER.

Your so sad that people are trying these methods, well as I've said before and you and others have over looked here

There are 2 TWO cases which have stopped all possession hearing because of the question of deeds not being signed.

I would also point out that until the Norgan case which I am sure you, or may be not agree had no help from CAG was done as a first ' TEST' case but that is only any good if the borrower can pay the extra and has the time to do it within the term and then the rates go up and up.

As said before there is no reason for you to worry I am sure a D/J and C/J know what they are doing.

 

The borrowers solicitor sends the mortgage deed to the land registry when the solicitor requests the borrowers to registered as the owner of the legal estate. The borrower does not send it to the lender.

 

Your providing advice when you are not even familiar with the actual process ?

 

To answer your question, no I don't have a copy of a letter that doesn't exist.

 

Yes Mark, I am Bones

Link to post
Share on other sites

YOU ARE WRONG YET AGAIN BEN THE BORROWERS SOLICITOR DID NOT SEND THE DEED TO THE LR AT ALL BUT TO THE LENDER AS I HAVE A COPY OF THE LETTER AND IT CONFIRMED.

sO IF YOU ARE SAYING THAT THEY ARE LIEING AND HAVE COMMITTED FRAUD THEN I'll BE HAPPY TO TELL THEM.

i AM AND HAVE BEEN VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE ACTUAL PROCESS FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS WHEN DEALING WITH THESE CASE.

AND YOU HAVE ANSWERED YOUR OWN QUESTION YET AGAIN

Link to post
Share on other sites

A snippet from the Law Society

 

http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/for-the-public/common-legal-issues/buying-a-home/

 

 

Completion

 

This is the final stage in the conveyancing process when your solicitor hands over the money to the seller and the keys are released to you. Your solicitor will pay the stamp duty land tax and Land Registry fees on your behalf. Your solicitor will register the interest of your mortgage lender and record you as the new legal owner of the property.

 

"your solicitor will register the interest of your mortgage lender"

 

Exactly as I previously posted

 

Yes Mark, I am Bones

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am still using "tried and tested" methods but they are not working

 

Hi Ya........ we were advised you were looking in.....Welcome.......tell your friends, family, associates, your neighbours...the man on the street.....the press.....tell everyone you come into contact with that which you have learnt here.....

 

I could not have made your point more clearly myself.....so....Here, Here.......

 

The current relied upon 'tried and tested' methods are not 'working'......They merely cover over the REALITY......and that is.....When you 'MORTGAGE' you affectively DISPOSE of the Legal and Beneficial Interest in your Estate......that means you are essentially paying and maintaining the house for the Lender......that's not what borrowers bargained for....and fortunately it is not what the legislator intended either....

 

We learnt that by virtue of the LRA 2002.....the legislator on noting that Lenders have been taking the proverbial.......and so since then no borrower has power to 'mortgage' only power to secure indebtedness.........

 

We learnt that if the deed is only signed by you....then it is VOID..... your lender will have NO DEFENCE.....

 

This will be so, even if you took the loan out over 400 years ago....

 

Check your Deed......has your Lender done you the honour of executing it?

 

I hear you when you say you have 28 days to put in a Defence.....The court will be ever so glad you found this thread....You will assist them give your lender short shift if they have not executed the deed.... : )

 

Please...... make my day and tell me your deed is only signed by you....

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

A snippet from the Law Society

 

http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/for-the-public/common-legal-issues/buying-a-home/

 

 

Completion

 

This is the final stage in the conveyancing process when your solicitor hands over the money to the seller and the keys are released to you. Your solicitor will pay the stamp duty land tax and Land Registry fees on your behalf. Your solicitor will register the interest of your mortgage lender and record you as the new legal owner of the property.

 

"your solicitor will register the interest of your mortgage lender"

 

Exactly as I previously posted

 

Ben

 

Thanks for this......Are you looking to push the blame on the Borrowers solicitor to say......it is the Borrowers Solicitors fault that the Lender did not execute the Deed??

 

Are you saying that the Lender will come into court and try to look to the Borrowers Solicitor for redress?

 

ummmmmm, that would be an interesting outcome:lol:

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have to read the deed for myself first, as many include a reference to further advances.

 

Some will say 'this deed is also used to secure further advances'

 

In addition Some will also say that the lender is not obligated to provide a further advance.

 

The wording is of paramount importance.

 

To give you a specific answer, the answer would have to be based upon a specific mortgage deed, that I have read for myself.

 

Also remember that the HMLR practice guide also includes another method by which further advances are accepted.

 

Ben

 

On the other thread...you were quick to advise that it is only if the mortgage deed makes reference to a further advance that the lender has to execute it.......are you having second thoughts??

 

I do wish you would do as we do.....which is to make the distinction between the formalities required by HMLR for an 'approved form of charge' and what statute (that's the Legislator) says...the legislator says that the borrower must sign and the lender must execute the Deed.......

 

Try to refrain from looking to confuse discerning consumers....we pay and contribute to the CaG.....we do not do that so that you can come and try to misguide us.....

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I knew you would be along soon lol

 

Not that you guys aren't on top of things without me : )

 

I can see all are well focused.......and MUST remain so.

 

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ya........ we were advised you were looking in.....Welcome.......tell your friends, family, associates, your neighbours...the man on the street.....the press.....tell everyone you come into contact with that which you have learnt here.....

 

I could not have made your point more clearly myself.....so....Here, Here.......

 

The current relied upon 'tried and tested' methods are not 'working'......They merely cover over the REALITY......and that is.....When you 'MORTGAGE' you affectively DISPOSE of the Legal and Beneficial Interest in your Estate......that means you are essentially paying and maintaining the house for the Lender......that's not what borrowers bargained for....and fortunately it is not what the legislator intended either....

 

We learnt that by virtue of the LRA 2002.....the legislator on noting that Lenders have been taking the proverbial.......and so since then no borrower has power to 'mortgage' only power to secure indebtedness.........

 

We learnt that if the deed is only signed by you....then it is VOID..... your lender will have NO DEFENCE.....

 

This will be so, even if you took the loan out over 400 years ago....

 

Check your Deed......has your Lender done you the honour of executing it?

 

I hear you when you say you have 28 days to put in a Defence.....The court will be ever so glad you found this thread....You will assist them give your lender short shift if they have not executed the deed.... : )

 

Please...... make my day and tell me your deed is only signed by you....

 

Apple

 

hello apple, my deed is signed by me and the witnessed signature is signed with a solicitor company stamp underneath so there are 2 signatures on my deed, does this mean I cannot apply to the chamber?

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL that's the point we ARE FOCUSED and that's the problem for them, may be some people need to redraft their defences to the chamber as looking at it again its not all that much about signing the deed but what is owed lol.

I also note that there are no responds to the question of how 2 cases have been put on hold then??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope no matter what ideas be they fanciful or otherwise are posted on this thread, it remains open at least until after the Property Chamber hearing.

 

It is of paramount importance that the outcome is published in this thread, to ensure no one else seriously considers those ideas.

 

Only then will common sense prevail

 

Yes Mark, I am Bones

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello apple, my deed is signed by me and the witnessed signature is signed with a solicitor company stamp underneath so there are 2 signatures on my deed, does this mean I cannot apply to the chamber?

 

Hi Ya

 

Your signature is required.....the person who witnessed your signature is also required along with their name and address.....that's your part done.....this is the 'solemn form' required in relation to your statutory duty to sign the deed.....

 

Your Lender is also statutorily required to execute the deed......'execution' is said instead of 'sign' for your lender because....the Lender is a Company....they have a duty to execute in accordance with their 'Articles and Memorandum of Association' (Ltd Companies) (Ben...have I said that right??)....and they also have a statutory duty (this is the legal duty) to execute in solemn form ...that's the signature of at least 2 Directors and witnessed...

 

If the space for your Lenders signature is 'blank'......THE DEED IS VOID

 

Please make my day......is the space where your lender is supposed to sign BLANK???

 

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am looking at a copy of my remortgaged deed ( I do not have a copy of the original mortgage deed) it is a single page and I cannot see any box where the lender signs or where it says lender signature, there are 4 spaces under signature of the borrower with the top box signed by me,the next column has 4 boxes also for signature name and address of each witness, the top box is signed and stamped by a solicitor, there are also 2 stamps from the land registry on the page so no in answer to your question there is no other signature, unless I am missing a page?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am looking at a copy of my remortgaged deed ( I do not have a copy of the original mortgage deed) it is a single page and I cannot see any box where the lender signs or where it says lender signature, there are 4 spaces under signature of the borrower with the top box signed by me,the next column has 4 boxes also for signature name and address of each witness, the top box is signed and stamped by a solicitor, there are also 2 stamps from the land registry on the page so no in answer to your question there is no other signature, unless I am missing a page?

 

When did you 're-mortgage'....Just state the Year please?

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3761 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...