Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

DianeC's Hubby V Amex - New Tack?


DianeC
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6438 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello fellow Warriors (Claimants),

 

I've been claiming against Amex on behalf of my husband for £270 Late Payment Fees against his Amex credit card (account closed last year). Now everything has gone swimmingly really, they've responded to my letters within allotted time-frames, etc., indeed, reading some of the Amex threads here, they've been acting as per usual -- I fully expected I'd have to go to Money Claim in a week's time to file. But the LBA got my hubby the reply copied below instead, and I'd like to know is it something new?

 

Text in red had me scratching my head, btw -- they've been really responsive and we received the letter they are talking about. I can only assume they are receiving so many claims that they are getting a little confused... (Bless).

 

************************************************

 

Dear DianeC's Hubby

 

I refer to your letters received in this office on 14th September and 4th October concerning the default charges levied to your account. I am sorry that you did not receive our acknowledgement letter sent to you last month, advising you that we would respond to you within twenty eight days.

 

Whilst I appreciate your comments concerning the recent announcement by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT), American Express maintains that our charges are fair and reasonable and are avoidable by complying with the Terms and Conditions of our agreement with you.

 

In light of the OFT recommendation American Express has changed the charging policy with respect to default payments. Our charges vary according to product and account type and reflect the differing riskes associated with each. The changes were applicable from 1st July 2006 and our previous default charges will not be amended.

 

We have informed the OFT that our default chages will be £8.00 on credit cards. This reflects the costs involved in administering accounts in default, and is calculated in accordance with the guidance issued by the OFT on how to calculate default charges.

 

However, with reference to your request, and as a gesture of goodwill, we are prepared to refund to you the sum of £174.00. This represents the difference in the default fees between the pre-existing and new rate above, as applied to your account from December 2003 to April 2005. Please find enclosed a cheque made payable to you for £174.00.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

Terry Jones

Executive Office Manager

 

*****************************************************

 

So, Hubby's nearly a hundred pounds down, and I don't know what to do now. I feel my husband should receive the full amount as a "gesture of goodwill", not a figure they feel is fair. Were they being fair when they levied these charges?

 

Could do with a little advice please.

 

Regards,

 

Diane.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The intial amounts charged if above £12 we unlawful, as such the full amount is claimable.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Steven, I'm already composing the next letter...

 

:D

 

Will keep you all posted.

 

I'm also beginning a weird claim against our mortgage company -- a pre-redemption challenge. We are selling our house, and are faced with strange and devious penalties for redeeming early. I'll grab some time later to start a thread explaining more.

 

Many thanks,

 

Diane.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats not quite the case - if Amex prove their costs to be £8 per default then they are completely right to refund you the difference between the £8 and the £25 or whatever it was. People are being refunded the full amounts because the banks will not go into court to PROVE their default charges are proportinate to the costs. So keep going for the full amount until they stand up in court and PROVE it costs £8.

Thanks, karnevil,

 

On this basis, I continue.

 

Here's the latest letter (a mish-mash of template stuff [thank you] and me). Something tells me we'll be claiming.

 

*******************************************************

 

10th October 2006

 

 

 

Dear Terry Jones,

 

 

 

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

I acknowledge receipt of a cheque for £174.00 and accept this payment as a partial settlement with regard to the full amount you owe me of £270.

 

I repeat my request in that I require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within four days from the date of this letter, which is fourteen days dated from my previous Letter Before Action, I will indeed begin action to claim for the remaining £96.00 plus interest plus my costs and without further notice.

 

Furthermore, I shall submit a Consumer Credit Act 1974 complaint to the OFT upon the basis that you have failed to comply with the OFT's direction of April 2006 and are therefore not a 'fit and proper person' to hold a consumer credit licence under the 1974 Act.

 

 

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

 

 

DianeC's Hubby

 

****************************************************

 

It would be soooooooo nice to have been the first that did not have to claim against Amex through the court. Sigh. Never mind.

 

Thanks for your help!

 

DianeC

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...