Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

pudsey2/ Associates


pudsey2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4309 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

martin i have an old associates card from before 2000 and i have noticed that i have a card protection on it £15.00 regular payment plan where do i and how do i start a claim and will it be with citi or cpp?

some advice would be grateful

thanks

pudsey2

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Associates card was taken over by Citi and it is Citi who are liable for any charges.In those days it was possible to have up to£50 charges levied every month as they had an overlimit charge of 25,then there was a late payment charge.

I claimed these around 2009,and if you had these charges,you should consider claiming them.

In respect of CPP, yes this was seen as conditional,and payments were taken monthly at varying rates,with an automatic rollover of the policy after 1 year.

In my claim against CPP, they maintain that it was Citi who my agreement was with and CPP said they had referred my complaint to them.I was sent a letter by Citi along with a FOS form to complete.

I know that CPP were used by most of the big card issuers and also mobile phone companies for some policies.

 

It seems to me,that at some point in the periods 2002 to 2009,that policies were transferred from card issuer to CPP on set up.

Although I am still looking to determine exactly which cards this applied to and what periods.

If this is correct,then in your case,it could be that both Citi AND CPP will be jointly liable for the periods over your card accounts.

It is likely in your case that there will be different account numbers.

What you need to do therefore is to find these and reconcile them.

 

You may need to do a full SAR to get the info from statements,even if you do have statements,in order to work out exactly what you paid and to calculate interest on that,you will need statements.

I suggest therefore if you dont have these,then get a SAR off to Citi.

I would not trust CPP to work out the amounts due.

As previously reported by me,when I emailed them back in 2009 asking for a refund,they replied that as my account was closed within the last 6 months,they did not hold records.

 

Of course that was tosh.

It was only after they were investigated later and found to have been guilty of mis selling that I contacted them again.

This company squirmed and pleaded poverty when they were on the rack.

Protests were even organised in their home city as they rallied the troops.

But as you will see in my report-they are far from being without some dosh to compensate those who they were quick to take it from.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...