Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, the vehicle went to Audi Chingford on Thursday 13th May. I did state beforehand that I only wanted a diagnostic. The technician out of courtesy opened the drain letting huge deposits of water escape the seals. Video evidence was provided via AUDI cam. The link for the audi cam has been forwarded to BMW and Motonovo. I spoke to branch manager explained the situation and he stated he would sent me an email outlining the issue. Audi state this is not really an issue and more of a design flaw. However, the seals still have water ingress. I purchased the vehicle with £0 deposit on a 60 months HP plan for £520.00. The vehicle total was £21000. I did not go for any extended warranty. I live almost 70 miles away from the aftersales centre in Peterborough. I have previously uploaded the document I forwarded to BMW however it was in word format. I have had to buy a new tyre almost three days after purchasing vehicle. BMW still have not compensated me for the v62 cost as they said they would. 
    • I would suggest that you stop trying to rely on legal theory – as you understand it. Firstly, because we are dealing with practical/pragmatic situations and at a low value level where these arguments tend not to work. Secondly, because you clearly have misunderstood the assessment of quantum where there are breaches of obligations. The formula that you have cited above is the method of loss calculation in torts. In contract it is entirely different. The law of obligations generally attempts to remedy the breach. This means that in tort, damages seek to put you into the position you would have been in had the breach not occurred. In other words it returns you to your starting position – point zero. Contract damages attend put you into the position that you would have been had the breach not occurred but this is not your starting position, contract damages assume that the agreement in dispute had actually been carried out. This puts you into your final position. You sold an item for £XXX. Your expectation was that you your item would be correctly delivered and that you would be the beneficiary of £XXX. Your expectation loss is the amount that you sold the item for and that is all you are entitled to recover. If you want, you can try to sue for the larger sum – and we will help you. But if they ask for evidence of the value of the item as it was sold then I can almost guarantee that either you will be obliged to settle for the lesser sum – or else a judge will give you judgement but for the lesser sum. This will put you to the position that you would have been had there been no breach of contract. I understand from you now that when you dispatch the item you declared the retail cost to you and not your expected benefit of £XXX. To claim for the retail value in the circumstances would offend the rules relating to betterment. If you want to do it then we will help you – but don't be surprised if you take a tumble.  
    • I was caught speeding 3 times in the same week, on the same road. All times were 8-12mph higher than the limit. I was offered the course for the first offense and I now need to accept the other 2 offenses. I just want to be ready for what might come. Will I get the £100 fine and 3 points for each of them or do I face something more severe?  These are my only offenses in 8 years of driving.
    • I'll get my letter drafted this evening. Its an item I sold, which I'm also concerned about, as whilst I don't have my original purchase receipt (the best I have is my credit card statement showing a purchase from Car Audio Centre), I do unfortunately have the eBay listing where I sold it for much less. But as I said before this is now a question of compensation: true compensation would seek to put me back into the position I was in before the loss ie: that title would remain with me until my buyer has accepted this, and so compensation should be that which would be needed to replace the lost item. But in the world of instant electronic payment, it could be argued that as I had already been paid, the title to the goods had already transferred, and I was required to refund the buyer after the loss. And so, despite my declared value being the retail price - that which is needed to return me to my pre-sales position, the compensatory value should be the value I sold it for, which being a second-hand item from a private seller is lower. I still believe that I should be claiming for the item's full value, rather than how much I sold it for, as this is the same for insurance: we don't insure the value we paid, but rather the value of the item to put us back into the position we would be in if we ever needed to claim. Its for the loss adjuster to argue the toss
    • amusing that 'bad economic judgement on behalf of prior party ISN'T a major reason to wingers to move to deform yet immigration is, where record levels of such has been driven by the right wings terrible brexit and the later incompetent dog whistle 'proposals largely driven to whistle to the right wingnuts Just seems to confirm the are clueless numpties 'wetting their own shoes   Has farage bought a property in Clacton yet?   yet concern for the NHS is listed as a major issue even by those saying they are moving to deform  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

I gave false details to the RPI. What do I say please?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4344 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I've just been reading a thread in which you kindly forwarded template letters for the above. I was wondering if you still had copies and whether you would possibly consider forwarding them to me? I fully understand if this is not possible. I've found myself in a similar situation with northern rail and would be devastated if I received a criminal conviction. Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

I've started a new thread for you, as you posted on an old one.

 

Maybe you could tell us what happened to you please and then I hope the guys will be able to help? If you can, tell us how long ago and which train company.

 

I don't think there is a standard template as such, because everyone's case is slightly different.

 

You may have gathered that giving false information is an offence in itself though [or that's my understanding], so this will need careful handling. I'll let the guys tell you. They should be here over the course of the day.

 

Edit: sorry, you said it's Northern Rail.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you are spot-on HB.

 

Fare evasion is an offence and providing false details is a separate offence that, if charged and convicted, carries exactly the same penalty. I have been in a Court recently where a traveller who had comitted both offences and was then positively identified, but failed to answer a Summons and was fined £400 for avoiding a fare and a further £400 for giving a false name and address. Add to that over £100 in prosecution costs and a fare of over £50.00 and a near thousand pound penalty was imposed giving some idea of how seriously this can be treated.

 

For the OP, yes please, if you can tell us a bit more about your particular situation, maybe we can help a little

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would very much appreciate help on this matter.

 

I boarded the train at my usual station at which the ticket office is closed for refurbishment. There was no opportunity to buy a ticket on board but staff were selling tickets at the barrier when I arrived at my destination. I stupidly bought a ticket from the station nearest my destination rather than from the station I had travelled from as I had a company cheque in my bag to purchase an annual ticket but was waiting for a letter of consent to use the cheque from my employer which they would be issuing later in the day. I did not want to duplicate rail fare for that day. On completing the purchase I was marched to a RPO and, again stupidly, gave a false name and address instead of explaining the situation. This was out of sheer panic and embarrassment. When I realised the RPO was going to check the details I gave the correct ones. I'm now waiting for a letter or summons. I'm absolutely devastated and could kick myself for being so stupid. I am willing to pay any amount of fine but need to avoid a criminal conviction as this will mean losing my job and house and being unable to visit close relatives in Australia.

 

Please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would very much appreciate help on this matter.

 

I boarded the train at my usual station at which the ticket office is closed for refurbishment.

 

Was there a self-service machine at the station?

 

There was no opportunity to buy a ticket on board but staff were selling tickets at the barrier when I arrived at my destination.

 

Why could you not buy a ticket on board the train?

 

I stupidly bought a ticket from the station nearest my destination rather than from the station I had travelled from

 

This indicates a clear intention to avoid paying the correct fare. It is what is commonly described as a 'short offer' and if concvicted, carries a maximum penalty of a fine of up to £1000 and a criminal conviction. It will be charged under Section 5 of The Regulation of Railways Act (1889)

 

I had a company cheque in my bag to purchase an annual ticket but was waiting for a letter of consent to use the cheque from my employer which they would be issuing later in the day.

 

I'm afraid that isn't a valid reason for not offering to pay the correct fare.

 

 

I did not want to duplicate rail fare for that day. On completing the purchase I was marched to a RPO and, again stupidly, gave a false name and address instead of explaining the situation.

 

I'm afraid that just makes matters much worse. This simply suggests that the allegation of 'intent to avoid a fare' is entirely justified and provision of false details is a seperate offence, for which another charge may well be laid. Both offences carry the same level of penalty if convicted, so 'double trouble' I'm afraid.

 

This was out of sheer panic and embarrassment. When I realised the RPO was going to check the details I gave the correct ones. I'm now waiting for a letter or summons. I'm absolutely devastated and could kick myself for being so stupid. I am willing to pay any amount of fine but need to avoid a criminal conviction as this will mean losing my job and house and being unable to visit close relatives in Australia.

 

I cannot offer a great deal of comfort in this case I'm afraid. I think the best that you can do is write directly to the prosecutors' office at the TOC concerned and give an unmitigated apology, explain the effect that a conviction might have on your career etc and ask if you might be allowed to pay all of their reasonably incurred costs and any unpaid fares in order to dispose of this out of Court.

 

They do not have to agree and I have to say that your original post suggests that it is fairly unlikely that they will, but as I have said many times before, it is always worth a try.

 

 

 

Please help.

Edited by Old-CodJA
Link to post
Share on other sites

Was there a self-service machine at the station?

 

 

 

Why could you not buy a ticket on board the train?

 

No, there was no ticket machine at the station and the train was completely full of standing passengers. No member of staff came round selling tickets (which they usually do). I do understand it is the passenger's responsibility to seek out the ticket sales person.

Edited by citizenB
edited at request of thread starter
Link to post
Share on other sites

I boarded the train at my usual station at which the ticket office is closed for refurbishment.

 

Was there a self-service machine at the station

 

There was no opportunity to buy a ticket on board

 

Why could you not pay your fare on train?

 

Staff were selling tickets at the barrier when I arrived at my destination. I stupidly bought a ticket from the station nearest my destination rather than from the station I had travelled from

 

What was happening at the barrier seems irrelevant, as your actions show a clear intention to avoid paying the proper fare. If charged & convicted of the offence of 'intent to avoid a fare or part thereof' contrary to Section 5.3 of The Regulation of Railways Act (1889), the maximum penalty is a fine of up to £1000 and will result in a criminal conviction.

 

I had a company cheque in my bag to purchase an annual ticket but was waiting for a letter of consent to use the cheque from my employer which they would be issuing later in the day. I did not want to duplicate rail fare for that day.

 

I'm afraid that isn't good reason not to pay the proper fare when asked

 

On completing the purchase I was marched to a RPO and, again stupidly, gave a false name and address instead of explaining the situation.

 

Sadly, this just makes matters worse. Providing false details when asked for a name and address is a separate offence, which carries the same maximum penalty on conviction, so 'double trouble' I'm afraid. It also seems to confirm the report that you intended not to pay

 

This was out of sheer panic and embarrassment. When I realised the RPO was going to check the details I gave the correct ones. I'm now waiting for a letter or summons. I'm absolutely devastated and could kick myself for being so stupid. I am willing to pay any amount of fine but need to avoid a criminal conviction as this will mean losing my job and house and being unable to visit close relatives who live overseas. Please help.

 

I am afraid I cannot offer great hope in this case I'm afraid, the best I can suggest is that you write to the prosecutors' office and offer an unmitigated apology, explain the effect that a conviction would have on your future career and offer to pay all of the costs incurred by the rail company as an alternative to pursuing this case in Court. You offer will need to present a more attractive outcome than sending their prosecutor, securing a conviction and recovering their fare & costs as seems likely at present.

 

They don't have to agree and I have to say that when the evidence from your post seems to confirm a clear intention not to pay the fare due at the time, I don't hold out a great deal of hope, but as I have said many times before, you lose nothing by giving it a try.

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

No, there was no ticket machine at the station and the train was completely full of standing passengers. No member of staff came round selling tickets (which they usually do). I do understand it is the passenger's responsibility to seek out the ticket sales person.

Edited by citizenB
edited at request of thread starter
Link to post
Share on other sites

No, there was no ticket machine at the station and the train was completely full of standing passengers. No member of staff came round selling tickets (which they usually do). I do understand it is the passenger's responsibility to seek out the ticket sales person.

 

OK, neither of these actually have a bearing on your action, I simply asked in order to understand better what actually happened. You, or your representative can mention the circumstances if this gets to Court, but in terms of your decision to offer a short fare and give false details, they cannot be said to alter the likely charge.

 

 

When responding to the letter, would it do any good to tell them I had had a terrible morning leaving my baby at nursery having recently returned from maternityleave? This genuinely contributed to my state of mind on that day but I realise they may just think me to be making irrelevant excuses.

 

 

You can say whatever you like in your letter, there is no harm in trying to encourage a little sympathy, but I suggest one key thing is not to 'pile on' what might be perceived as 'emotional blackmail'.

 

That can often be counter-productive. A truthful explanation with genuine apology and request for consideration, with a written undertaking never to repeat the offence is much more likely to get a result.

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, neither of these actually have a bearing on your action, I simply asked in order to understand better what actually happened. You, or your representative can mention the circumstances if this gets to Court, but in terms of your decision to offer a short fare and give false details, they cannot be said to alter the likely charge.

 

 

 

 

 

You can say whatever you like in your letter, there is no harm in trying to encourage a little sympathy, but I suggest one key thing is not to 'pile on' what might be perceived as 'emotional blackmail'.

 

That can often be counter-productive. A truthful explanation with genuine apology and request for consideration, with a written undertaking never to repeat the offence is much more likely to get a result.

 

Thankful for your help, much appreciated. I've drafted a letter ready to reply. I can't express how idiotic I feel, but what's done is done. Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
How did you get on with your letter? Heard anything back?

 

Just an update. I'd got the train company wrong. It was Transpennine Express rather than Northern rail. I hadn't heard anything at all and was worried sick so I eventually called Northern Rail to see if they had anything on file, which they obviously didn't. The lady at the other end was surprisingly pleasant and quite sympathetic and advised me to send in a letter with as much detail as possible. I'd already had a quick word with a solicitor who'd advised me to send in a letter of apology but not to admit to anything directly but I thought I should really just explain what had happened and try to convey that it was really not my intention to leave them unpaid. However, the other day I received a letter from Transpennine which didn't even ask for an explanation of the situation, it was just asking for payment of £78.50 for costs. I feel very, very lucky. I think Northern Rail prosecutions dept are actually quite decent from having spoken to themand will genuinely take into account your situation. I suspect the best course of action would be to send a genuine explanation followed up by a very polite phone call. I'm just so glad it's been resolved. I really feel for all the decent people out there who've made one mistake and are now facing a possible criminal conviction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...