Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • As one of you mentioned above I've been in a mess for nearly 20 years now and I'm ready to sort my credit report out now - the main reason I got into second round of debt is my kids being unwell and the state considering them not unwell enough for extra help so despite my son being in hospital for 3 months in one year we got extra zero help and I eventually lost my job and got into debt to just so I can be تا my sons hospital bed at his time of need - my life basically fell apart and all these debts got me again 
    • Gosh mate I've woke up this morning with half the worry I had last night when going to sleep!.  I can't believe how much this forum has helped me over the years and I don't  have the words to explain the gratitude I feel towards you guys -  Now that I've slept on it I feel ready to reject this company and my plan is to make them an offer to accept payments to date as full and final settlement - I will I think write them a letter once my review is completed or maybe just send it now whilst they are reviewing explaining my kids are unwell for which reason I'm struggling to survive and if I can politely request for them to accept payment to date as a full and final - I'll mention I don't have any cash or anyone to borrow from to offer a full or even part amount of the remaining balance of the iva and therfore am unable to make a offer of payment.   If they agree to at least even put my offer to the creditors then I feel it's better I hang in there and that way I won't have to deal with any possibilities of more defaults and ccjs    Right now the only adverse effects on my credit report are the iva that is now 3 years old and 2 Ccj one coming of this July and one thus October.    But I am worried new action will begin and new defaults and Ccj may start to appear because I've paying into an agreement im under the impression the 6 year rules starts again so yes I have lost of mixed feelings about this but I'm not going to lie you guys have put some life back into my breath this week as for the last 3 years I've felt caged like an animal and this morning I feel freer I can't explain how much but certainly my soul feel lighter today thanks to yin because I'm now viewing this review totally different to I do yesterday thanks to you guys 
    • Court name UNKNOWN Case number ********** Amount N/A Confirmed by Insolvency Service Date issued May 2021 Type Voluntary Arrangement Notes If you have questions about voluntary arrangements you should speak to the Insolvency Service.     I started this in 2021. So it's been about 3 years I've been paying. 
    • Thanks @lookinforinfo@Nicky Boyi sent across the agreement earlier in this thread. No mention of financial reward to the MA. But, I wouldn't be surprised if it was done on the sly. As I said earlier, the owner of OPS is a convicted criminal, with a very shady reputation around these parts.
    • The average high street easy-access account pays 1.7% interest - but savers could earn 5% if they moved their money elsewhere. We look at which banks have the top rates.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4351 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

They will have 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the claim to give you a final decision before the matter can be referred to fos.

 

What you should expect back is the entire premium plus the interest you would have paid through your monthly payments plus 8% on those payments made running from the date of payment to the date of settlement.

 

In addition it is likely that you would have overpaid the PPI on settlement of the loan, even if they did give you a rebate, so you should get interest on that as well.

 

Very difficult to be precise as you haven't quoted any figures for PPI above.

 

I hope you kept copies of the documents you sent this claims outfit. Sadly I thyink it is too late to get out of the contract you have with them.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi

 

Yes I'm in the wrong business :lol:

 

These claims companies do talk drivel. Prior to January the FSA granted extensions of time but from January it is back to the standard 8 weeks.

 

I would wait the 8 weeks and see what happens. It is your decision as to whether to pass to fos or not, not theirs.

 

ims

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yep....nosebag....food :-)

 

Ok so in answer to your PM questions.

 

They have made an offer for the years paid before this was taken over by a mortgage. That principle is correct.

 

You would get back the amounts actually paid towards the PPI part of the loan plus the interest paid on that and 8% on each payment actually made running from the date of the payment to the date of settlement.

 

Now, when the loan was taken over by the mortgage, part of the balance taken over would have been the remaining PPI on the loan, less any rebate that may have been given (I would suggest that no rebate was given).age

 

So you had to borrow extra money on your mortgage to pay off part of the PPI on the loan. This is why they are saying that there will be an adjustment to the mortgage, to remove the residual PPI from it.

 

This is all based around the underlying principle that you must be put back in a position that you would have been in had the PPI not been added in the first place.

 

In order to work out the figures to see whether their offer is correct we would need the figures from the agreement. I see you were going to ask for the return of that document....did you ever get it back?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Ok I'll answer the questions in reverse order

 

The taxable portion of your award is only the 8% statutory interest...not the rest of it.

 

You will pay the claims company a percentage of the entire claim amount, both the physical refund and any adjustment made to the mortgage as a result of the residual PPI. So in effect this is the premium in full, the contractual interest paid and the 8%.

 

Now the bit that needs more work. Can you tell me whether your mortgage is a repayment mortgage or interest only?

 

The lender should put firm figures to you before you accept. It is not right that they say we will adjust the mortgage upon receipt of your acceptance if they haven't told you what the value of the adjustment is going to be. Bear in mind that if you have been making mortgage payments then the PPI part of those payments should come back to you by way of refund plus 8%. It is the future payments that should be affeceted by an adjustment to payments.

 

It is not possible to work out exactly what you should get back unless you can get that loan agreement back

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but part of that mortgage would have included residual PPI from the first loan and therefore you have been paying PPI on loan 1 through your mortgage.

 

Think of it this way...

 

You have a loan for £9,000 with PPI of £1,000 added to it so a total of £10,000 which you pay off at, say £100 per month. Let's assume the loan is interest free to avoid complication.

 

You make 10 payments and then convert the loan to a mortgage. 10 payments would mean you will have paid £1,000 off the loan leaving a balance of £9,000 which is refinanced into a mortgage. Part of that £9,000 is the PPI part of the loan.

 

In this example the PPI is 10% of the total loan so 10% of that £9,000 balance is the PPI part of the loan which of course is £900.

 

So if that PPI hadn't been in the loan to start with then you would have had to borrow £900 less on the mortgage to pay off the first loan.

 

So the fact that you had to borrow £900 more to pay of the PPI part of the loan means that some of the repayments you are making on the mortgage include a percentage towards that £900 part of the first loan.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but that settlement of the loan included the settlement of the ppi part of the loan. If that PPI hadn't been there in the first place your settlement figure would have been less and so would your mortgage.

 

Your mortgage loan is higher as a result of having to pay off a ppi that shouldn't have been there.

 

Consequently your mortgage repayments are higher than they would have been. As a result you have been paying too much on your mortgage up to now as a result of that PPI. If no adjustment is made to the future of the mortgage then you will still be paying too much so your future mortgage payments have to be reduced to avoid you continuing to pay that higher amount

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and besides i think the offer is fair just not how tey are paying it

but if i go fos will take ages so probably best just appcepting as need the dosh and could do without another 6 month wait :-)

 

At the end of the day its your call but of you can get that agreement back we should be able to work out what should be happening and the amounts involved.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Broadly speaking yes but the method of redress in these types of cases is set out by the FSA/fos and the bank should adhere to those principles.

 

I have to say, if it were me, I'd want to check the figures properly before accepting.

 

We never trust a bank !

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need....when that agreement comes back we can work out what you should physically receive and what the adjustment to the mortgage should be.

 

Tectonic plates move faster than fos so I wouldn't bother with them if I could avoid them

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry..they are the plates that form the earth's crust. They move slowly, grind against each other, build up pressure and when they release we get an earthquake. :-)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the offer letter doesn't give the full picture as to how they propose to deal with it then you need to ask the questions of them so that you are completely clear on how they are dealing with this refund.

 

If they are proposing to pay some of your refund to the mortgage then that is wrong unless you have arrears.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok now we know what the PPI premium was to start with, the figures we have at the moment do not stack up.

 

Did you get any rebate of PPI when the loan was paid off by the mortgage. If so, how much was it?

 

If you haven't got that information or figure then you need to ask them the question.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What doesn't add up is the fact that your premium alone was just over 6k.

 

In total they are offering you 3.4k ish plus 1.7k ish which is 5.1k and that includes interest.

 

When a loan is settled early then yes rebates on PPI are generally calculated although not all lenders played fair with the rebates. If they gave you a rebate then their offer figure would be closer to what it should be but without that rebate figure we can't check.

 

Might be worth a phone call to the lender to ask the question.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your letter should just ask them how the figure of £1,700 is calculated (you want to see the calculations).

 

In addition yur letter should ask them what about the contractual interest you have paid on the PPI sum included in your mortgage AND what about the 8% on those payments as well.

 

The amount of £3,400 odd they have calculated up to the date the loan was settled is bang on.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter starts Dear Sirs

 

First paragraph says that they haven't given you enough information as to whether you can accept their offer or not. Tell them that you are willing to accept an offer when they provide the following further information.

 

1 The settlement statement for the first loan showing the settlement balance on the loan and details of any rebate of PPI given at that time.

 

2 Their calculations as to how the £1700 mortgage reduction figure is arrived at

 

3 Their proposals for refunding the extra interest charged on the mortgage account as a result of PPI a ppi balance being included in it from the start.

 

 

You then finish by saying that if they provide all of that data the likelihood is that agreement can be reached but if they fail to supply you with adequate calculations and evidence you will refer the matter to fos who will undoubtedly require them to provide it and it may cost the £850 for a case fee as well. They can avoid this by providing you with the information now.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...