Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good luck with that. Most leases don't even follow the majority of the 2002 regulations (too old) let alone the new one. The £250 cap needs to be placed in the lease through a deed of variation and good luck getting freeholders to agree to that. It's not just some magical thing that just caps it one day. Some freeholders are only reducing them through lease extensions at massive costs (essentially buying out the difference in ground rent) and if you're doing that you might as well extend on a peppercorn anyway.
    • Yeah, I would confirm that anyway, as there is a separate sheet where I have to put in those details and my insurance number and driving licence number. That is on page 2 (page one is their allegations) then page three is a statement that you weren't the driver and space to give details who was driving. Page 4 is an empty sheet for a statement to explain the situation. So I will fill out my details as the driver on page 2, admitting I was driving at the time, and then attach my statement as above as a separate sheet. That should hopefully do it at this stage
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Seems OK, except that you must provide your details (as the driver). Include your name, address, DOB and driving licence number. This is to comply with s172 of the Road Traffic Act. Keep a copy and get a free Certificate of Posting from the Post Office.
    • Dear all, some information/advice required please.   I recently received a Further Steps Notice about a fine from 19/03/2018 which I knew nothing about. It was regarding a vehicle parked on the street without tax ( It was covered up and there because the only key to it had been stolen, I had been away from home  and I was having trouble getting a new key cut and coded to the vehicle )  I had not made a change of address to DVLA which would be why I knew nothing about the fine until receiving the final steps notice dated 29th April 2024 and giving me 10 working days to pay, although the notice did not arrive till May 9th 2024. I emailed the London Collection and Compliance Centre on May 13th 2024 asking for any information and they sent me a copy of the original fine. It is for  £390 back vehicle tax, £85 cost and £600 fine.  I now have received a Notice of Enforcement dated 7th June 2024 demanding payment ( total £1036)  or an arrangement by 6am 15th June ( tomorrow )  My question is is it tool late now to question the £600 fine part of the total amount to be paid ? That amount seems punitive.  Would making a statuary declaration regarding having no knowledge of the original court date apply ? And any other advice gratefully received. I am on Universal Credit and apparently they have already taken £177 via benefit reductions which I wasn’t aware of, but does make it seem strange that they were also unable to contact me.    Many thanks for any assistance 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Link Financial Debt and Tomlin Order


ally500
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4434 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, i have just found this site, really hope someone on here will be able to help with my situation! I stupidly purchased a timeshare in florida in 2009, with Tempus Resort, after reading the small print and noticing i had been lied to and conned i cancelled my agreement within the 10 day cancellation period. However, i did not send this letter by registered mail, so, surprise surprise they did not recieve it. I have no proof that i sent this letter. I sent numerous letters and was basically ignored. As a result i have refused to pay towards this purchase, my debt was sent onto GE money and is now with Link Financial and i continued my refusal to pay. Link have now sent me a Tomlin Order which i have said that i would be willing to pay just to get them off my back, however they also want me to sign a voluntary restriction......i am not prepared to do this as i do not want them to touch my property! I could afford to pay this debt (monthly, in very small payments), however, i refuse to due to the lies i was told and the fact that i tried to cancel my purchase!

Basically the latest letter i have recieved is them telling me this will be a fast track trial and they will seek a CCJ for the sum in question (approx £16000 + interest + legal costs). and then get permission from the courts for a charging order to be made against my property. Can they do this?? Even though my original loan was unsecure?

 

I have since looked on the Tempus resort complaints site, complaints.com and seen numerous posts from people who have got into the exact situation, a large number of people infact (started a pertition type forum) . I just do not know what to do, the stress of life itself is enough without this on my shoulders :( any advice would be greatly appreciated :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I've merged your two identical posts, moved your thread to Legal Issues (in view of the Tomlin Order) and changed the title slightly.

 

The guys will be happy to advise as soon as they are available

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

a fast track trial and they will seek a CCJ for the sum in question (approx £16000 + interest + legal costs). and then get permission from the courts for a charging order to be made against my property. Can they do this?? Even though my original loan was unsecured

 

Indeed they can; see Part 73 of the CPR. Basically they are proposing to short circuit the court process to save time and costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your comment. What would you reccommend then? Is it a no win situation? Do i stand a chance in court with no evidence :( If i sign the voluntary restriction and make the small monthly payments do they then have a hold over my property and coan force me to sell it anyway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't want to give you any advice about the merits of defending the claim, I would suggest you see a solicitor for an initial consultation so that they can see all of the documents and understand the detail of the case.

 

As for selling the property, it all depends on the terms of the restriction. It can be on terms that it is not to be enforced so long as payments are maintained which obviously gives you some security. As it is a voluntary restriction you have some flexibility to negotiate terms. Beware that however it is certainly possible for a restriction to be arranged in such a way that an application to court to force a sale can be made, although these are very rarely granted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your comments i really appreciate this. I am stressing so much and just do not know what to do. Link Financial basically sent me the paperwork for land registry (it didnt explain to me what it was, no details whatsoever) so i think i will contact them and ask for a copy of the agreement in full. If they cannot force me to sell my property then i guess this is probably my best option. If i get a CCJ ...do you know if they will then look at my income/ outgoings etc and take as much as i can afford? Or will they allow small monthly payments? (And take into account that i have to pay to live also?!) Thank you again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If i get a CCJ ...do you know if they will then look at my income/ outgoings etc and take as much as i can afford? Or will they allow small monthly payments? (And take into account that i have to pay to live also?!) Thank you again.

 

The court can determine a reasonable payment but, and this is critical, the court will assess what is reasonable balancing the interests of both parties so if the CCJ is for £16,000 and you offer £5 per month, even if that is all you can afford, don't be surprised if the court just orders payment forthwith rather than setting an instalment plan at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question. Do they still claim that you own the timeshare in question and would you be able to use it? If they didn't receive notice of your cancellation and are prepared to go to court to get the money, do you get the timeshare, or was it all a complete con from day one?

consumeractiongroup.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi i just spoke to Link and they are going to send out the terms and conditions of the Tomlin order and voluntary restriction. He explained that they would not force me to sell my property if the monthly payments are made on time etc, however if i was to sell my property in the mean time (21 years) then they would take what i owe from the sum made on my property. In answer to your question...The timeshare became dafault when the debt was sold on to GE money, therefore no i would not be able to use it. The timeshares do actually exist, however, so many lies are told about the deal (obviously making it sound amazing!) that people are still purchasing them, by the time they've read the small print its too late to get out! Or in my case you try to cancel and they dont receive the letter! There is a site full of complaints towards this resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh well i have received the terms and conditions from Link not in the most professional format (just a simple letter). They basically say that as long as the debt is paid monthly they will not force me to sell my property, i am being asked to pay £60 for 21 years. I think i will just have to do this, if it saves me being black listed etc. Unfortunately i cannot afford court fees to follow through with complaints as if i dont win it will cost me a lot of money upfront. Well thank you all for your help anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...