Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

moliver v's Abbey National Mortgage Finance


moliver
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6372 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had a mortgae with ANMFL back in 1997 which came with cashback of about £7k for which i had to pay 0.75% above their standard variable rate on the whole mortgage for five years or repay the cashback. As I had no intention (hope) of paying back the mortgage in that timescale, there was no issue :)

 

I moved house after a couple of years and simply moved the mortgage to the new property - still no problem

 

At the end of 2000 I was offered a job in Jersey where it wasn't really possible to own a house. Couldn't rent it out for anywhere near the amount of the mortgage and so had to sell and repay the mortgage :?

 

Despite various appeals to Abbey, pointing out that if I didn't sell the house I would default on the mortgage the still stung me for £7,438 Early Repayment Charge :evil:

 

There followed various letters all in the same vein including some extraordinary and banal explanations of how they had lost money, which as I pointed out at the time would mean that they would have lost £38,000 had I redeemed the mortgage after one day - banks are really that silly?????????:eek:

 

Eventually they issued a deadlock letter and pointed me in the direction of the Office Of The Banking Ombudsman - at that point I gave up!

 

The I found this site and have now started again.:p

 

First letter sent 4th July 2006

 

P*** o** letter from Abbbey sent 12th July 2006

 

LBA sent 21st July 2006

 

letter from Abbey 26th July - if you want to take us to court - here is the address for service!

 

MCOL

Claim No 6QZ68236

£7,438 plus £3,400 in interest

Issued 29/09/06

 

Ready for a tough battle!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Moliver,

 

Best of luck with this one. Abbey aren't the most accomodating of companies to deal with. Their latest trick is to threaten to multi -track and tell you their costs are already the same as your claim. Have you pmed a mod the claim no and details?

 

All the best

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zoot

 

Thanks for your words of support - if their costs are higher than my claim then I wouldn't want to be a shareholder in Abbey. If the ERC is the same value on day one of the mortgage as it is at the end of five years I just can't see how they can argue a 'genuine pre-estimate'.

 

Haven't pmed a mod - how do i do that?

 

 

Regards

 

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mark,

 

I'll inform the mods. You might like to follow this thread as they are at about the same stage as you.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mortgage-companies/28447-stef-abbey-mortgages.html

 

and this one which is a little more ahead

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mortgage-companies/9207-reclaiming-abbey-mortgage-early.html

 

All the best

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

As expected the stalling has started!

 

They had until tomorrow to acknowledge (18th October)

 

Received in the post today a letter from DLA Piper with a request under Part 18 for further information - basically acoount numebr and address.

 

Does this mean that I cannot apply for judgement for a further 14 days?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that's over a week since judgement was issued and I've not heard a word from Abbey, their solicitors or the Court - anyone got any advice on how to proceed particularly as the claim is £11k?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't send in the bailiffs until the judgment has actually been granted. I'm not sure how long it takes from issue for them to enter judgment. In my claim against Littlewoods it was only a matter of days.

 

It might be worth phoning the customer services at MCOL and find out what has happened. It may well be that Abbey are disputing the judgment and asking for more time. Don't contact Abbey at this point as it may well alert them to the fact that they need to get the judgment set aside.

 

All the best

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

usual trick by Abbey I am afraid.

Spanish Holiday Rental - 10% off BAG and CAG Members

www.rent-in-spain.org.uk

 

 

Progress so far:

 

Yorkshire Bank - LBA 26/07/06 £1001.00 - £500.50 offered and rejected

RBS Credit Card - Settled £200.00

Sainsburys - Settled in full £100.00

JD WIlliams - Settled in full £50.00

Argos Card Services - £98 - offered £60 and rejected.

Abbey Mortgages - MCOL 2nd October - Deadline 21st

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...